Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2023, 05:45 PM   #361
Fourteen FTW
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Fourteen FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Ps. I just ate a whopper at a rest stop off the 401. Thanks for the dinner chat while my car charged. JP out. Go Flames! Go top draft picks!
Fourteen FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:46 PM   #362
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
I think you’re the one who doesn’t understand. You might want to do some reading on necessary and sufficient conditions.
I understand perfectly, thank you very much.

If you can do X without meeting condition Y, then Y is not a necessary condition for X.

If you can meet condition Y and still fail to do X, then Y is not a sufficient condition for X.

Teams have won the Stanley Cup in the cap era without drafting in the top 2. Therefore, drafting in the top 2 is not a necessary condition for winning the Cup.

Teams have FAILED to win the Stanley Cup in the cap era when they DID draft in the top 2. Therefore, drafting in the top 2 is not a sufficient condition for winning the Cup.

Have I made some mistake in either of those last two statements? No, I have not. If you think I don't understand the terminology, that is YOUR failure of understanding, not mine.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:46 PM   #363
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Wtf? ^

Relax guys.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:47 PM   #364
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG JESUS H. FLIPPING CHRIST!!!!!

Pittsburgh won the Cup with FOUR, count 'em, FOUR top-two picks on their roster. There is no goddam rule that a team can only have one top-two pick! Therefore, it is not impossible for EVERY top-two pick to be on a winning roster, whether they ever change teams or not. IT JUST DOES NOT HAPPEN.

And you have not established ANY correlation, because you have TOTALLY FAILED TO EXAMINE THE NULL HYPOTHESIS. Learn some statistics!
Technically is 3 teams rotated 1st overall , 2nd overall , and then winning the cup over and over so only 3 (or a very very small number of teams ever drafted 1 and 2 ) it could mathematically happen

Although the new lottery rules probably make it as close to statistically
Impossible as it could get .
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:48 PM   #365
Fourteen FTW
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Fourteen FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Wtf? ^

Relax guys.
It’s fun because convincing each other has ZERO impact on the teams outcome.
Fourteen FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:48 PM   #366
flamesgod
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
They shouldn't.

But how far back are we going to go? That Detroit Red Wings team was built in an NHL that is much different from what we have now. The core of Datsyuk, Lidstrom, Zetterberg was drafted at a time when teams did not do the same level of scouting in Europe as they did now. Do you think it is likely or even possible a team is getting that level of players now?
There will always be players picked in later rounds, who turn out to be gems. It’s why teams like Edmonton spin their wheels and teams like Tampa win cups. You need steals, you also increase your odds with picking 1st and 2nd overall. You need them both equally imo. Vegas has Marchessault, Tampa has Kucherov.
flamesgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:49 PM   #367
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourteen FTW View Post
@spurs - you state “ you can't find a team that won without a top 5 pick they made on their team.”

How many teams that lost have at least one top 5 pick they picked?

You may be able to prove its likely you need one to win. It is unlikely you prove having one does anything to stop you from losing.
I did the math over the 15 year period from 2003-2018 previously

40% of 1st overall players and 53% of 2nd have won a cup

Pretty damn good odds
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:49 PM   #368
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
More flat out lies.

Can you make a post without completely making #### up.
Many many MANY times, you have been asked how many teams that meet your arbitrary criteria do NOT win the Cup. You have never answered or even acknowledged that question!

THAT IS NOT A LIE!!!!!!

Good God, you're annoying.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:50 PM   #369
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Edit - Dupe Post
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:50 PM   #370
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
No, but the team that won without the cap had been dismantled to be compliant. You don't just get to dismiss it as if it didn't count.]
Again explaining it isn't dismissing it.



Quote:
It is if you are trying to state a rule.
Wrong again



Quote:
Now do St. Louis.
St. Louis drafted Pietrangelo



Quote:
NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT THE GODDAMN FLAMES HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On a Flames message board, in a Flames thread, with people talking about whether the team should rebuild, retool, recycle, reboot nobody is talking about the Flames? LOL


Quote:
They have had – Bennett. They never won with him.
Nobody has said having a top 3 pick is a guarantee.

Quote:
Every single team has been in that position. Most of them did not win anything while they were in that position.
Yes, nobody has said it is a top 5 pick and then Stanley Cup.


Quote:
No, it's me seeing a connection that you don't grasp.
No it is you making up things that were never said.


Quote:
As opposed to basing your argument on a vote by scouts cast when the players were 18 years old and had never played a pro game?
LOL sure the draft is a vote and the argument I am posting has shown to be true.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:51 PM   #371
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Many many MANY times, you have been asked how many teams that meet your arbitrary criteria do NOT win the Cup. You have never answered or even acknowledged that question!

THAT IS NOT A LIE!!!!!!

Good God, you're annoying.
I haven't been asked that many times at all, again a lie.

I also addressed the point in a reply to someone above.

All you have to do is read what is actually posted not what you want to see.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:52 PM   #372
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod View Post
There will always be players picked in later rounds, who turn out to be gems. It’s why teams like Edmonton spin their wheels and teams like Tampa win cups. You need steals, you also increase your odds with picking 1st and 2nd overall. You need them both equally imo. Vegas has Marchessault, Tampa has Kucherov.
Has anyone said anything different?
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:54 PM   #373
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Wtf did I just scroll through on the last 3 pages?
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2023, 05:54 PM   #374
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourteen FTW View Post
@spurs - you state “ you can't find a team that won without a top 5 pick they made on their team.”

How many teams that lost have at least one top 5 pick they picked?

You may be able to prove its likely you need one to win. It is unlikely you prove having one does anything to stop you from losing.
I never claimed that a top 5 pick equals automatic success. Why would I want to prove something that I don't believe.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:55 PM   #375
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Technically is 3 teams rotated 1st overall , 2nd overall , and then winning the cup over and over so only 3 (or a very very small number of teams ever drafted 1 and 2 ) it could mathematically happen

Although the new lottery rules probably make it as close to statistically
Impossible as it could get .
WRONG AGAIN.

There are MANY ways that it could happen, because careers do not just last for a couple of years.

All that is needed is, on average, for two new top-2 picks to win the Stanley Cup each season. When the Penguins won their first, they knocked four names off the list at once. If you are counting on a long period of tanking to accumulate many top picks, you should expect this sort of thing to happen. And if that were a reliable way of building a championship team, it would happen more often than it does. But it doesn't.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:56 PM   #376
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
I haven't been asked that many times at all, again a lie.
I have repeatedly put the question in this very thread. If you didn't think it was directed at you, that's your damned fault.

Quote:
I also addressed the point in a reply to someone above.
Then please quote yourself. I did not see you answer it.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:56 PM   #377
flamesgod
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
Has anyone said anything different?
Well, considering you asked if it’s possible to get players like Detroit had in later rounds? I’d say you did. It’s right in the quote.
flamesgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 05:57 PM   #378
Fourteen FTW
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Fourteen FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

This is quickly becoming my favourite thread in a long, long time
Fourteen FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 06:00 PM   #379
Fourteen FTW
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Fourteen FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I think spurs is flip-flopping
Fourteen FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2023, 06:00 PM   #380
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod View Post
Well, considering you asked if it’s possible to get players like Detroit had in later rounds? I’d say you did. It’s right in the quote.
I said if it is possible to get 3 players the quality that Detroit did.

That is the big difference. Getting a Gaudreau is certainly always possible but getting 3 Hall of Fame players in the 3rd, 6th and 7th rounds is probably not happening again.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy