Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2023, 02:41 PM   #81
Bandwagon Surfer
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oakland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
Eliminate the loser point. Don't even bother with points, just have wins and losses and go with win percentage.

10 minutes of 3 on 3. The players will get tired and make mistakes.

I would be interested in not allowing them to bring the puck back past the red line when playing 3 on 3 though.

I don't like 3 on 3 when the game itself is 5 on 5 but 3 on 3 does create some exciting plays when the teams are playing to win and not to just "not lose". Need to end the games quickly and 3 on 3 does create more opportunities to end it.

Eliminating the loser point is key. Until the incentive to play for a tie is removed, we are going to keep finding ourselves back in the same situation.

People always optimize to the rewards. As long as that loser point reward is there, people will figure out how work around the rules to get it.

We have seen this how many times already? New rules are introduced to eliminate/reduce ties and make the game more exciting. It works for a little bit, then teams adjust and figure out new ways to get that point. Then repeat with the next rule changes.
Bandwagon Surfer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bandwagon Surfer For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 02:47 PM   #82
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I feel like not allowing teams to bring the puck out of the offensive blueline would solve a lot of OT issues. If teams want to maintain possession, they have to do it within the offensive zone, and cannot bring the puck out themselves to regroup.

Not even sure a penalty would be needed, but I do like the 3 on 2 suggestion.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 02:49 PM   #83
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Two pucks. No sticks. One bear on skates.
This is an excellent suggestion.

Maybe there should be a fan union.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.

Last edited by Shazam; 11-14-2023 at 02:51 PM.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Shazam For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 02:53 PM   #84
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I feel like not allowing teams to bring the puck out of the offensive blueline would solve a lot of OT issues. If teams want to maintain possession, they have to do it within the offensive zone, and cannot bring the puck out themselves to regroup.

Not even sure a penalty would be needed, but I do like the 3 on 2 suggestion.
That's probably the simplest solution. Just blow it down like an offside if they exit the zone after entering.

It's hard to control what bears do though. I could see the bear going offside a lot.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 02:54 PM   #85
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
That's probably the simplest solution. Just blow it down like an offside if they exit the zone after entering.

It's hard to control what bears do though. I could see the bear going offside a lot.
Oh! Easy. "No Offsides for Bears."

Sorted.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 02:55 PM   #86
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

3 for regulation win
2 for OT win (10 min 5-on-5)
1 for tie
0 for any type of loss.

Get rid of loser point, give incentive for teams to try to push for the win at the end of the regulation, or in overtime. Those points will really matter during the playoff race during the last segment of the season.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 02:58 PM   #87
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

better plan just end in a draw, it's not like this makes any difference to US support anyways
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 02:58 PM   #88
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I feel like removing the loser point (and still giving 1 point for a tie) will only make things worse. Players are risk averse and will fear the loss of losing the 1 point more than gaining the extra point for an OT win.

It might get more interesting closer to the end of the season.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 03:01 PM   #89
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I feel like removing the loser point (and still giving 1 point for a tie) will only make things worse. Players are risk averse and will fear the loss of losing the 1 point more than gaining the extra point for an OT win.

It might get more interesting closer to the end of the season.
For the first half of the season, that could be the case, which is no different from how it is now, since teams would prefer to take the point. But in the second half, the pressure of the math could be enough of an incentive to push teams to go for the win to get more points, especially in the last month of the season. If it helps make the playoff chase more exciting league wide, that's a net benefit for the NHL.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 03:09 PM   #90
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Frankly I don't care what they do as long as they get rid of the shoot out
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 03:16 PM   #91
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon Surfer View Post
People always optimize to the rewards. As long as that loser point reward is there, people will figure out how work around the rules to get it.
I agree absolutely.

Scotty Bowman agrees with us both. He was opposed to the loser point from the moment it was introduced.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 03:20 PM   #92
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Zero points for losing. Big fan of that.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 03:22 PM   #93
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Apparently the Flames have already workshopped this idea.

Seems like the Bruins get an unfair advantage.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 04:53 PM   #94
White Out 403
Franchise Player
 
White Out 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
Exp:
Default

Already said very well but I'll just throw in my two cents as well, three on three is a complete circus on a sideshow. I say play 10 minutes of four on four and then end it in a tie
White Out 403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 04:59 PM   #95
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Out 403 View Post
Already said very well but I'll just throw in my two cents as well, three on three is a complete circus on a sideshow. I say play 10 minutes of four on four and then end it in a tie
Insufficient number of Bears.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 05:00 PM   #96
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

3-2-1 points system. That's the only change that needs to be made.

0 points for losing in SO or 3V3 OT is too extreme for what are gimmicks, and I don't think ongoing 5v5 is feasible with the TV partners and travel in the regular season. Think the answer has been right in front of them for years but they have refused to do it.

3 points for regulation win
2 points for OT/SO win
1 point for OT/SO loss.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 11-14-2023 at 05:03 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2023, 05:56 PM   #97
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Make 3 v 3 10 minutes. Bring back tie. A 10 min 3 on 3 would almost assuredly end sooner than that. If no team was able to get 2 points beyond OT, no team would play for it outside of a team actually only needing 1 point for some reason, which would be very rare. Maybe make the win worth 3 and a draw worth 1 just to boost it.
__________________

Last edited by Coach; 11-14-2023 at 06:15 PM.
Coach is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 06:36 PM   #98
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

2 points for a win.
Zero points for a loss.

After 60, play 3 on 3 until someone scores. No rule modifications, just play hockey.

It's that simple.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 08:16 PM   #99
White Out 403
Franchise Player
 
White Out 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Insufficient number of Bears.
I lol'd.
White Out 403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2023, 08:34 PM   #100
Derek Sutton
First Line Centre
 
Derek Sutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bc-chris View Post
one of the rules we have in men's league for OT is you are not allowed to do a line/player change at a whistle - changes only happen on the fly.
lots of scoring chances when there are tired guys defending!
Men’s league OT? Just cuts into beers drinking time.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
Derek Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Derek Sutton For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy