Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2023, 07:42 PM   #121
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Trying to pull of a 2-3 year re-build is a good way to ensure that re-build fails.
Yup. Year 2-3 you should still be picking top 5, you might even only start picking that high by then.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2023, 07:55 PM   #122
Eric
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

As much as I hate to admit it, Calgary won’t be picking top 5 this year. They will be picking 8-13ish.

This team will pick it up at some point and go on a run. Too much talent. I just hope we suck enough for Conroy to pull the pin before the deadline.
Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Eric For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2023, 08:30 PM   #123
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I really like the first round of this draft. It would be nice to aquire a pick or two before the deadline…
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2023, 08:40 PM   #124
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

You know.... If the Flames at least do what they need to in order to pretend "re-build" aka UFA trades and dumping Hanifin and Lindholm for picks + prospects and end up winning enough to get 8th... I'd be happy to see our young guys do well as a group honestly.

But on the flip side if it helps us tank even further then I wont be mad either.

I don't think we need to put a time frame on a re-build in Calgary, you make the necessary moves, trust your scouts and go youth movement where you can. There's obviously some contracts were not trading, and that's okay.

But lets at least do what we can control today and start this franchise on a better path, no timelines, no expectations, just a group of guys that want to be flames and that give a #### about winning.
I'd be much happier with that, because spending money to watch this incarnation is a travesty.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2023, 08:43 PM   #125
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Trying to pull of a 2-3 year re-build is a good way to ensure that re-build fails.
Yeah, I like the idea of starting to see results in 4-5 years. It means your early rebuild picks worked out and are established, while you should still have a decent prospect pipeline from later years and some cap space too.

It requires Tampa level ruthlessness when it comes to contracts, and moving on from guy that can be replaced by prospects in the system (and acquiring more assets in the process).

It would make the on ice product pretty exciting for the new arena. And with a patient GM this time, it could set the team up for a long run of playoff seasons.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2023, 11:59 AM   #126
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Brayden Crampton, a defenseman for the Spokane Chief, who plays with Berkley Catton (ranked #5 or so in the upcoming draft), has 17 points points in only 13 games. This is surprising, because Crampton only had 16 points in 56 games last year. He unsurprisingly went undrafted. This is one if the biggest and offensive jumps I've seen. It'll be interesting to see where he ends up.

And Berkly Catton is someone may well be ranked around where the Flames pick. So he might be worth keeping an eye on. He went #1 in the 2021 WHL Bantam Draft. A good skater and playmaker, but could with on his defense. He's basically the same height as Celebrini and Eiserman, but he could add some weight (Eiserman is almost 30 lbs heavier).
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2023, 12:35 PM   #127
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Trying to pull of a 2-3 year re-build is a good way to ensure that re-build fails.
I would typically agree with this, but I think the flames have the pipeline to justify a short rebuild window. We already have a potential longterm goal solution, coronato, zary, honzek, maybe Poirier or Morin as a puck moving dman. That's a solid group of young players who I think are mostly complimentary outside of wolf, but good complimentary pieces. If we nose dive and pick 2-3 years worth of very high picks and 1-2 extra firsts from selling off the roster, it should be a very good core.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2023, 12:37 PM   #128
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Yup. Year 2-3 you should still be picking top 5, you might even only start picking that high by then.
Exactly - it usually takes 2-3 years just to bottom out, never mind worrying about building back up
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2023, 12:38 PM   #129
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

I would disagree that we have the pipeline for a short rebuild. We have some nice pieces for sure, but this is probably still a bottom half prospect pool both in terms of quality and quantity. The next 2-3 drafts are absolute key for the Flames, as you also have to make up for a pretty meh class in 2021 and almost skipping the full 2022 class.

Last edited by devo22; 11-04-2023 at 12:44 PM.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2023, 02:16 PM   #130
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
I would disagree that we have the pipeline for a short rebuild. We have some nice pieces for sure, but this is probably still a bottom half prospect pool both in terms of quality and quantity. The next 2-3 drafts are absolute key for the Flames, as you also have to make up for a pretty meh class in 2021 and almost skipping the full 2022 class.
It may be difficult for the Flames to truly be contenders for as long as the Kadri, Markstrom, Coleman, and Huberdeau contracts affect the team. Especially Huberdeau and Kadri for the longer term. Contenders require optimal cap efficiency, see Vegas, Carolina, Boston, etc. Dallas is somewhat of an exception, but even Benn was second only to Robertson in points last year. A Johnston is already an elite player who only makes a million per year.

So it seems like Kadri's contract may be a natural timeline for a rebuild. It's possible the Flames could contend with just the Huberdeau contract as an anchor. Though at this time, Huberdeau would be in his last 30s, and his deal would be far less cap efficient than it is now.

A rebuild could conceivably be shorter if the Flames get truly elite talent at the very top of a draft. 70+ point players on their ELCs are incredibly cap efficient and can counteract terrible contracts on other players.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 02:58 AM   #131
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Elite Prospects Top 10:

1) C Macklin Celebrini
2) RW/C Ivan Demidov
3) LW Cole Eiserman
4) C Cayden Lindstrom
5) D Sam Dickinson
6) D Artyom Levshunov
7) C Berkly Catton
8) C/RW Konsta Helenius
9) LW Ryder Ritchie
10) D Adam Jiricek
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2023, 08:22 AM   #132
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
I would disagree that we have the pipeline for a short rebuild. We have some nice pieces for sure, but this is probably still a bottom half prospect pool both in terms of quality and quantity. The next 2-3 drafts are absolute key for the Flames, as you also have to make up for a pretty meh class in 2021 and almost skipping the full 2022 class.
Yeah this team is in no way a candidate for short rebuild. Not a single prospect in the organization that has elite first line/pairing potential. There's certainly some quality prospects that may be able to fill middle six and top 4 defense grouping but the Flames don't have the "next" guys in their system. Hopefully this draft they can nab one.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 10:47 AM   #133
Ashes
Scoring Winger
 
Ashes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
I would typically agree with this, but I think the flames have the pipeline to justify a short rebuild window. We already have a potential longterm goal solution, coronato, zary, honzek, maybe Poirier or Morin as a puck moving dman. That's a solid group of young players who I think are mostly complimentary outside of wolf, but good complimentary pieces. If we nose dive and pick 2-3 years worth of very high picks and 1-2 extra firsts from selling off the roster, it should be a very good core.
This is where I'm at as well, I think we already have an interesting mix of complimentary players coming up through the system. Maybe some of them exceed expectations and projections, now we need to hit on some draft picks with top line/top pair production, and the best chance of doing this is by picking high in the first round, and/or having extra bullets in the chamber.

Dallas is used as an example lately of what the Flames could look like in a few years if drafting was prioritized and I like the idea. Of course it helps that Dallas dominated the 2017 draft by picking 3, 26, and 39, and grabbing Heiskanen, Oettinger, Robertson in one fell swoop. And yes the Flames fumbled a similar opportunity in the Monahan draft by picking Poirier and Klimchuk, but I'd still fully support the Flames doubling down on draft picks for the next 2 years at least.
Ashes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 10:55 AM   #134
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
Elite Prospects Top 10:

1) C Macklin Celebrini
2) RW/C Ivan Demidov
3) LW Cole Eiserman
4) C Cayden Lindstrom
5) D Sam Dickinson
6) D Artyom Levshunov
7) C Berkly Catton
8) C/RW Konsta Helenius
9) LW Ryder Ritchie
10) D Adam Jiricek
3 of the top 4 could fill the #1 C position.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2023, 10:55 AM   #135
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Cayden Lindstrom a 17 year old 6'4 centre that already weighs 215 pounds has Calgary Flames written all over him.
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2023, 10:58 AM   #136
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Cayden Lindstrom a 17 year old 6'4 centre that already weighs 215 pounds has Calgary Flames written all over him.
Playing in Medicine hat too. Looks like others are lower than him than Elite prospects, but there is a good chance the Flames pick outside the top 5 anyways.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 11:04 AM   #137
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
3 of the top 4 could fill the #1 C position.
And if we got “stuck” with the only non-C, we’ve got a future 40 goal scorer. What a shame!
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2023, 11:56 AM   #138
RyZ
First Line Centre
 
RyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
Elite Prospects Top 10:

1) C Macklin Celebrini
2) RW/C Ivan Demidov
3) LW Cole Eiserman
4) C Cayden Lindstrom
5) D Sam Dickinson
6) D Artyom Levshunov
7) C Berkly Catton
8) C/RW Konsta Helenius
9) LW Ryder Ritchie
10) D Adam Jiricek
Carter Yakemchuk barely making the top 120 as a 6'3 Dman with 19 pts in 17 WHL games seems off. He's ranked as a mid-first on every other list I have seen. Did these guys gloss over him or did ythey see something in his game that knocks him down 3-4 rounds from where everyone else has him?
RyZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RyZ For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2023, 12:17 PM   #139
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyZ View Post
Carter Yakemchuk barely making the top 120 as a 6'3 Dman with 19 pts in 17 WHL games seems off. He's ranked as a mid-first on every other list I have seen. Did these guys gloss over him or did ythey see something in his game that knocks him down 3-4 rounds from where everyone else has him?
I would've thought that he would be ranked around #22 or so.
Personally, I'd have him even higher than that.
He has attribute that are tough to teach: size, tenacity, and offensive awareness.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2023, 03:10 PM   #140
fotze2
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
I would've thought that he would be ranked around #22 or so.
Personally, I'd have him even higher than that.
He has attribute that are tough to teach: size, tenacity, and offensive awareness.
His dad also owns the Fort Mac. Burger king, that's got too count.
fotze2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fotze2 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
2024 nhl draft , nhl draft


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy