Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2023, 08:25 PM   #9141
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Conroy, unlike the fans, needs to give it more than two games
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 08:29 PM   #9142
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Lindholm's current contract is still a huge bargain today. With 50% retention, name a contending team that wouldn't want to add another #1 centre who is reliable on both sides of the puck?



AFAIK, Lindholm's cap hit at the deadline will be (assuming I have the math right) $1.1 million (before retention). (4.850million)x(42/185). (cap hit)x(42 days left in the season divided by a 185 day season).



Name a contender that can't squeeze 550k at the deadline somehow after the Flames retain. That's a ridiculous add for Colorado, for Tampa, for Carolina, NOT for Edmonton, for New Jersey, for whomever else considers themselves a contender. I would imagine that the bidding war would be fairly large.


If Hanifin doesn't re-sign by then, then he would be in the same boat with teams adding him onto the roster for below league minimum at the deadline (with the Flames using their second slot on max retention).


Both would probably return a healthy injection of picks and a good prospect.



I am on the fence on whether or not the Flames should re-sign Lindholm. I really am. I have stated many times that I prefer having the Flames enter into a formal rebuild as I don't really see a contender here. However, I also think that simply doing an excellent job through the draft and prioritizing that can lead to building a contender without having to tear it down, and I do feel Calgary is a good enough organization in terms of drafting and development to do that.



At this point, I just want to see what Lindholm would actually return as an asset that brings a cap hit under a league-minimum deal (assuming, once again, that I have my math right). There would be zero playoff-bound teams (and a few that are close hoping to sneak in) that wouldn't call Conroy.

It's a 192-day season, so Lindholm's $4.85M deal would have a pro-rated $1.06M cap hit if traded at the deadline. $530,000 at full retention.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 09:17 PM   #9143
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
What are the options you see?

I think if you make a hockey trade you 100% downgrade. No way you get an equal or better player to Lindholm making 5 million. I think trying to go that route would be foolish. They did that with Tkachuk and Toffoli and you downgraded twice. That seems like a treading water strategy.

A futures deal is likely a downgrade as well but at least has more potential for a home run and also gives a longer runway to try and build around those pieces. But if that's your strategy then actually commit to that strategy and go all in on it. Trying to win now and retool is likely counter productive.

Do you see another path Conroy could take?
I think you’re providing an answer to a question I didn’t ask. Conroy has options. Whether they are a downgrade or an upgrade is a different question. It also doesn’t matter what options I see because I’m not in the room with Conroy. Like you and nearly everyone else here, I have no first hand knowledge of what the option’s actually are. It’s probably a reasonable assumption to make that the Flames have received offers on their UFA’s, or they’ve at least had discussions about their availability and what they might be worth to other teams.

I think you’re right though that it’s hard to see a trade out there where Lindholm is dealt for a $5M player of equal or better performance. I don’t see that happening.

I will say I think this belief that’s teams are either A) contending or B) rebuilding is simplistic. Every team is building in some form or fashion. Whether you’re Vegas or San Jose every team is building. It seems to me a lot of people think it’s one or the other rebuilding or contending, and there’s nothing in between.

Can the Flames remain competitive and ‘rebuild’, yes, absolutely. An example of this is what the Canucks did with Horvat. They traded him for a package that included a 1st, prospect. And a top 9 player. They subsequently traded that 1st for a top 4 D who is a valuable piece in their line up right now. Is that a net win or loss? Time will tell.

The Flames could do the same, or similar. They could trade pending UFA’s for draft/prospect capital to then turn into players. In a sense this is exactly what they did in both Hamilton trades. It’s been floated by myself and others, what if the Flames trade Hanifin for a future based package and flip some of this assets to Philadelphia for Konekny? Or, the Flames could keep the acquired picks and prospects. Those are options.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TOfan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 09:24 PM   #9144
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

You guys may have noticed there are almost no trades in the NHL at the moment and even in the summer players like Taylor Hall were being given away.

Conroy's best option right now is to let things play out for a while. If there are moves to be made it will be closer to the deadline.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 09:35 PM   #9145
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Conroy, unlike the fans, needs to give it more than two games
Honestly, I am cautiously optimistic after the first two games.


The team seems mistake prone at the moment, but the individual efforts have been there. You can tell that they are adjusting to a new style of play which I think will just take some time until things start to click. They also need to stay out of the box more, which should come as the mistakes diminish.

Or maybe it doesn't click, but we should at least give it until December before figuring out if this rendition will be a dud.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 09:36 PM   #9146
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
It's a 192-day season, so Lindholm's $4.85M deal would have a pro-rated $1.06M cap hit if traded at the deadline. $530,000 at full retention.
That's insane. That should command an absolute ransom at the deadline for a contender.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 09:43 PM   #9147
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't think the Flames will be out of it come the trade deadline March 1, with still 23 games to play.

If Lindholm is humming and haahing when Conroy checks in with his party in a month, you move him with the right offer, ideally to a team theta lost a center to injury, whenever.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2023, 09:45 PM   #9148
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

There isn't a reason to panic for any team right now. Rosters across the league are pretty set, so dealing a guy like Lindholm has to wait until the deadline. There are virtually no moves that happen this early in the season unless someone is an RFA. Team wise, they're looking alright, though I've been totally skeptical of Markstrom the past couple seasons. So far he's looking better than the past 1.5 years, so that's nice. If I'm wrong I'm wrong but I'm skeptical he can just snap out of it.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2023, 09:47 PM   #9149
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
I don't think the Flames will be out of it come the trade deadline March 1, with still 23 games to play.

If Lindholm is humming and haahing when Conroy checks in with his party in a month, you move him with the right offer, ideally to a team theta lost a center to injury, whenever.
But why trade him before the deadline for a crappy return when you can command complete attention at the deadline with a $500k star centre for contenders to bid over? Seems like a panic move and terrible asset management.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2023, 10:01 PM   #9150
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
But why trade him before the deadline for a crappy return when you can command complete attention at the deadline with a $500k star centre for contenders to bid over? Seems like a panic move and terrible asset management.
If we were able to move Lindholm right now then I wouldn't see it as a panic move. If you wait for the deadline and other teams wait and not giving you a good offer, you risk having to take whatever you can get. The right move is to trade the player when you don't need to, not when you absolutely need to.
genetic_phreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2023, 10:07 PM   #9151
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

There should be a bidding war for Lindholm at the deadline. It shouldn’t matter that “you have to” deal him if multiple teams are interested.

We have occasionally seen some big deals in season so if you’re going to move on, you start the conversations now. Take injury risk off the table if you trade him sooner.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2023, 10:26 PM   #9152
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Can the Flames remain competitive and ‘rebuild’, yes, absolutely. An example of this is what the Canucks did with Horvat. They traded him for a package that included a 1st, prospect. And a top 9 player. They subsequently traded that 1st for a top 4 D who is a valuable piece in their line up right now. Is that a net win or loss? Time will tell.
I'd be disappointed if the Flames traded Lindholm for a 3rd liner and a top 4 dman. That isn't rebuilding that's treading water.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2023, 06:28 AM   #9153
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
I'd be disappointed if the Flames traded Lindholm for a 3rd liner and a top 4 dman. That isn't rebuilding that's treading water.
Well, it seems you are looking at that example in a vacuum.

First of all, the Canucks didn’t get a 3rd liner and a top 4D, they got a top 9 player, a prospect, and the 17th overall pick in what has been considered as the deepest draft in a decade, or more? What the Canucks decided to do with that pick was their choice. That’s hockey currency. The Canucks spent it but they also could have put it in the bank. That’s what I’m talking about when it comes to Conroy’s options. He could load up on draft capital or he could use that capital to acquire NHL ready players or NHL players. Or, he could resign some/all of the pending UFA’s. simply put, Conroy has options.

If the Flames traded Lindholm for a similar package would you be upset? If they traded him to Columbus or Detroit for a package of similar value, that would upset you?

I’m confused because a lot of people who seem to be clamouring for a rebuild are also the ones who are complaining about the team’s current state even if it is leading them into the rebuild they, ironically, desperately want.

Last edited by TOfan; 10-16-2023 at 06:33 AM.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2023, 06:44 AM   #9154
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Well, it seems you are looking at that example in a vacuum.

First of all, the Canucks didn’t get a 3rd liner and a top 4D, they got a top 9 player, a prospect, and the 17th overall pick in what has been considered as the deepest draft in a decade, or more? What the Canucks decided to do with that pick was their choice. That’s hockey currency. The Canucks spent it but they also could have put it in the bank. That’s what I’m talking about when it comes to Conroy’s options. He could load up on draft capital or he could use that capital to acquire NHL ready players or NHL players. Or, he could resign some/all of the pending UFA’s. simply put, Conroy has options.

If the Flames traded Lindholm for a similar package would you be upset? If they traded him to Columbus or Detroit for a package of similar value, that would upset you?

I’m confused because a lot of people who seem to be clamouring for a rebuild are also the ones who are complaining about the team’s current state even if it is leading them into the rebuild they, ironically, desperately want.
It’s because they seem to think that the Flames can get better futures if they focus on prospects/picks which is never true. They have to go for a player like Sillinger and hope on the small chance he breaks out like Suzuki. The teams who want Lindholm and Hanifin are not going to trade a top center or defense prospect for them.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2023, 08:10 AM   #9155
robertsfanatic
Powerplay Quarterback
 
robertsfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Honestly, I am cautiously optimistic after the first two games.


The team seems mistake prone at the moment, but the individual efforts have been there. You can tell that they are adjusting to a new style of play which I think will just take some time until things start to click. They also need to stay out of the box more, which should come as the mistakes diminish.

Or maybe it doesn't click, but we should at least give it until December before figuring out if this rendition will be a dud.
agreed and sorry if this has been posted already but isn't there a rule of thumb around new coaches? like it takes 17 games to adjust?
__________________
*Disclaimer: I am a "glass half full" Flames fan.
robertsfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2023, 08:27 AM   #9156
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
But why trade him before the deadline for a crappy return when you can command complete attention at the deadline with a $500k star centre for contenders to bid over? Seems like a panic move and terrible asset management.
That’s a reasonable stance if the Flames are committed to dealing Lindholm if he doesn’t sign a new contract.

But I’m not especially confident management will make that decision if the Flames are in a playoff spot or 4 points or less out at the deadline.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2023, 08:45 AM   #9157
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

The market is quiet right now, because all teams are trying to determine exactly what they have (and don't have). That takes about 20 games typically, or around US Thanksgiving. By that point, it starts to become clear what they've got, and whether their team is worth adding to, or needs a fix/addition. At that point, the market for Lindholm and Hanifin will start to open up (assuming they haven't signed).

That doesn't mean the Flames should rush out and move them for the first offer that comes along, but it does open the door to discussions that could turn into a package that the Flames like. And if not, demand will continue, and grow, right up to the deadline, when both of them would be very sought-after. The problem with waiting until the deadline is that the returns become entirely picks and prospects, and the Flames are looking for players that are ready now, or soon. My guess is that they will move at least one of them by January or February, again assuming they haven't signed already.
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2023, 09:00 AM   #9158
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Some team with playoff/cup intentions will have a major injury to a top 4 dman/top 2 center and at that time Hainifin/Lindholm will look real enticing to save their season. No rush.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMike For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2023, 09:14 AM   #9159
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
I'd be disappointed if the Flames traded Lindholm for a 3rd liner and a top 4 dman. That isn't rebuilding that's treading water.
What do you expect for him?
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2023, 09:16 AM   #9160
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
The market is quiet right now, because all teams are trying to determine exactly what they have (and don't have). That takes about 20 games typically, or around US Thanksgiving. By that point, it starts to become clear what they've got, and whether their team is worth adding to, or needs a fix/addition. At that point, the market for Lindholm and Hanifin will start to open up (assuming they haven't signed).

That doesn't mean the Flames should rush out and move them for the first offer that comes along, but it does open the door to discussions that could turn into a package that the Flames like. And if not, demand will continue, and grow, right up to the deadline, when both of them would be very sought-after. The problem with waiting until the deadline is that the returns become entirely picks and prospects, and the Flames are looking for players that are ready now, or soon. My guess is that they will move at least one of them by January or February, again assuming they haven't signed already.
Didn't rasta say they have an internal Christmas deadline or something?

I'm sure that's not in concrete, but it might speak to a mid season, pre deadline, fish or cut bait.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy