Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2023, 02:10 PM   #8821
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I really don't think there's a lot of teams out there that would be willing to give Lindholm an 8 x $8.5 million deal. He's certainly not going to get that money from a team that's close to winning the cup as it would be the bottom tier teams with cap space and even some of them would likely be weary of giving him that term. This happens to other teams as well and you get the feeling the Flames are bidding against themselves here. If he's really looking for between $8.5-9.3 million then I really think the best course of action would be to trade him at the deadline and move on. Maybe even circle back in free agency once he starts seeing offers from other teams and see what his market value really is. I think it would end up as one of those moves where they dodge a bullet.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 02:15 PM   #8822
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Lindholm in Calgary has been a 0.88 player. Do we seem him continue on that path and is that worth 9 million plus for the next 8 years?

He has shown he can't carry his own line, but he can be a very good complimentary piece on a line. That's the issue I think its hard to figure out.

He has value to us for sure as he fills a hole, but at 9 plus for 8 more years that's a tough one.
I think the biggest question is what sort of player will be paid $9M in 2-3 years.

Here are players that are currently paid in the $8.5-9M range:
Skinner
Makar
Hamilton
Kaprizov
Meier
Pietrangelo
Crosby
Laine
Larkin
Zibanejad
PLD
Foresberg
Horvat
Draisaitl
Stamkos
Sergachev

Does Lindholm belong in this group? He would definitely be on the lower end in terms of how he impacts games. When was the last time you remember Lindholm actually taking over a game? I have a hard time recalling him being a difference maker last year: Either on the PP, 3 on 3, or when we were trailing in the 3rd and needed a goal.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 02:24 PM   #8823
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I think the biggest question is what sort of player will be paid $9M in 2-3 years.

Here are players that are currently paid in the $8.5-9M range:
Skinner
Makar
Hamilton
Kaprizov
Meier
Pietrangelo
Crosby
Laine
Larkin
Zibanejad
PLD
Foresberg
Horvat
Draisaitl
Stamkos
Sergachev

Does Lindholm belong in this group? He would definitely be on the lower end in terms of how he impacts games. When was the last time you remember Lindholm actually taking over a game? I have a hard time recalling him being a difference maker last year: Either on the PP, 3 on 3, or when we were trailing in the 3rd and needed a goal.
I would Lindholm for any of those guys not named Skinner and even he had 82 points last year
Snuffleupagus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 02:32 PM   #8824
1_Flames_Fan
#1 Goaltender
 
1_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

I'm starting to lean towards the not signing him camp. Particularly if the team already made a fairly generous offer and he balked at at. See what kind of season he has and trade him at the deadline or sooner if a can't miss offer comes up. That 8-9+ million in cap space has a lot of value as well.
1_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to 1_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 02:40 PM   #8825
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I really don't think there's a lot of teams out there that would be willing to give Lindholm an 8 x $8.5 million deal. He's certainly not going to get that money from a team that's close to winning the cup as it would be the bottom tier teams with cap space and even some of them would likely be weary of giving him that term. This happens to other teams as well and you get the feeling the Flames are bidding against themselves here. If he's really looking for between $8.5-9.3 million then I really think the best course of action would be to trade him at the deadline and move on. Maybe even circle back in free agency once he starts seeing offers from other teams and see what his market value really is. I think it would end up as one of those moves where they dodge a bullet.
While I agree with the gist of your argument, one team that’s in win now mode that could afford Lindholm is the Hurricanes. They’re getting frustrated with not much to show for being a top team for several years now, and they’ll have the cap space next season. They also reportedly made a pitch for Lindholm last season at the deadline. So we know they like him.

If Lindholm doesn’t re-sign here, it wouldn’t surprise me if he ends up in Carolina.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 02:42 PM   #8826
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
While I agree with the gist of your argument, one team that’s in win now mode that could afford Lindholm is the Hurricanes. They’re getting frustrated with not much to show for being a top team for several years now, and they’ll have the cap space next season. They also reportedly made a pitch for Lindholm last season at the deadline. So we know they like him.

If Lindholm doesn’t re-sign here, it wouldn’t surprise me if he ends up in Carolina.
Would be pretty funny if he ended up back there after they traded him to us.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 03:00 PM   #8827
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
I would Lindholm for any of those guys not named Skinner and even he had 82 points last year
Are any of these even recent contracts...kind of important for market value

Scheifele just signed an 8.5

and with Lindholm you can't just compare points as he is a center and better defensively than most of the list
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 03:21 PM   #8828
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Are any of these even recent contracts...kind of important for market value

Scheifele just signed an 8.5

and with Lindholm you can't just compare points as he is a center and better defensively than most of the list
I mostly agree with you. However I did start questioning Lindholm defensively a bit. Is he better than Backlund? Does he or Backlund get the toughest defensive match up? How good was the Lindholm line in defending against the Oilers in the playoffs? That year in 12GP Lindholm had 4G, 9P, and a -7.

It wasn't just that year either. Here are Lindhlom's career stats in the playoffs: 27GP, 8G, 9A, 17P, -11. Was Lindholm a difference maker(defensively or offensively) against Dallas in the COVID season? Against Colorado in 2018-19?
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 03:32 PM   #8829
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I mostly agree with you. However I did start questioning Lindholm defensively a bit. Is he better than Backlund? Does he or Backlund get the toughest defensive match up? How good was the Lindholm line in defending against the Oilers in the playoffs? That year in 12GP Lindholm had 4G, 9P, and a -7.

It wasn't just that year either. Here are Lindhlom's career stats in the playoffs: 27GP, 8G, 9A, 17P, -11. Was Lindholm a difference maker(defensively or offensively) against Dallas in the COVID season? Against Colorado in 2018-19?
A deeper dive and article I posted yesterday I believe Lindholm was in the 55th percentile and Backlund was 95th in defensive metrics.

I think we have overrated his defensive impacts, some of that might be because he played with linemates who blew the zone.

Its a big deal. We need to be sure with him.

Being iffy makes it a hard no unless the numbers come down or term.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 03:41 PM   #8830
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd be comfortable giving Lindholm $9M on a 3-4 year deal. On an 8 year deal I honestly don't think the Flames should offer any higher than $7.5M/year. He's a mediocre 1C. Good player, want to have him, but is absolutely not worth a massive deal with a $9+M AAV. We're already stuck with Huberdeau and Naz's deals, we don't need a third boat anchor.
N-E-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 06:54 PM   #8831
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I have been thinking throughout the offseason what would be the ideal trade where they flip2 pending UFA’s for a stud RFA her player. I am thinking the value here is in favor of Calgary likely significantly and due to the divisional rival thing it wouldn’t happen but here goes anyway:

To Canucks: Lindholm+Hanifin+Dube
To Flames: Pettersson+Garland

Reasoning. In order for any of this to make sense you have to buy into the rumor that Pettersson is not sold on a long term extension in Vancouver. The Canucks refusal to rebuild puts them in a spot to add a replacement center, Dman and winger. The Canucks would likely need to be willing to meet the $9.3M ask from Lindholmsnd I assume like the Flames-Panthers deal they would push hard to sign or flip Hanifin. I think they get an upgrade going from Garland to Dube who comes cheaper with more flexibility. They do not need to retain any salary the total cap difference is $200k.


The Flames get their reverse Tkachuk deal and add an in prime talent who they pay for an 8 year deal likely in the $11-12M AAV range. Long term fit with Huberdeau could be special and it helps the Flames stay competitive potentially long term. Garland could likely find a home playing on Backlund or Kadri’s wing and brings a right hand shot.


Ultimately the Canucks would never trade their 24 year old top line C for pending free agents from their biggest rival. It does seem like Pettersson could pull a Tkachuk/Dubois if the Canucks do poorly again.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 07:08 PM   #8832
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I have been thinking throughout the offseason what would be the ideal trade where they flip2 pending UFA’s for a stud RFA her player. I am thinking the value here is in favor of Calgary likely significantly and due to the divisional rival thing it wouldn’t happen but here goes anyway:

To Canucks: Lindholm+Hanifin+Dube
To Flames: Pettersson+Garland

Reasoning. In order for any of this to make sense you have to buy into the rumor that Pettersson is not sold on a long term extension in Vancouver. The Canucks refusal to rebuild puts them in a spot to add a replacement center, Dman and winger. The Canucks would likely need to be willing to meet the $9.3M ask from Lindholmsnd I assume like the Flames-Panthers deal they would push hard to sign or flip Hanifin. I think they get an upgrade going from Garland to Dube who comes cheaper with more flexibility. They do not need to retain any salary the total cap difference is $200k.


The Flames get their reverse Tkachuk deal and add an in prime talent who they pay for an 8 year deal likely in the $11-12M AAV range. Long term fit with Huberdeau could be special and it helps the Flames stay competitive potentially long term. Garland could likely find a home playing on Backlund or Kadri’s wing and brings a right hand shot.


Ultimately the Canucks would never trade their 24 year old top line C for pending free agents from their biggest rival. It does seem like Pettersson could pull a Tkachuk/Dubois if the Canucks do poorly again.
The Canucks won't do that trade. Trading Petterson would mean a rebuild for them. In that case they would be looking to get prospects/picks. Getting Lindholm/Hanifin/Dube and resigning them would ensure a mediocre bubble team for 5+ years.

If you trade all those players for futures, then you might use them to get a guy like Petterson.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 07:29 PM   #8833
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

Frank Seravalli walked back his prediction that there is a good chance Lindholm re-signs before the season. He now says there’s not much hope. So, it seems Seravalli has joined Team Friedman and Sec214.

This was on FlamesTalk today.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nelson For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 07:41 PM   #8834
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

Frank also says the risk is on Lindholm’s side. I agree. I think the Flames have made a very fair offer, and Lindholm risks a lot by not accepting that offer.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 07:44 PM   #8835
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Which means either he doesn't want to be here or has an inflated view of his own worth. It is hard to see a way forward unless he comes out on fire and the flames cave.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 08:29 PM   #8836
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson View Post
Frank Seravalli walked back his prediction that there is a good chance Lindholm re-signs before the season. He now says there’s not much hope. So, it seems Seravalli has joined Team Friedman and Sec214.

This was on FlamesTalk today.
I am also joining the club. My info was the Flames final offer was 9Mx8yrs and I really thought Lindholm would take it, I was absolutely wrong. I am not sure if it is the structure, the bonuses, or he thinks he can get more but I always believed this number would get it done. As I said before something strikes me in the way he doesn't seem to smile like the rest of the group or even give his best effort from what we saw in the pre-season. I am starting to believe this guy doesn't want to be here. Unfortunately it is too early to get a good return for him I think, the Flames are going to have to wait this one out for awhile. Very disappointing to me.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 08:31 PM   #8837
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I am also joining the club. My info was the Flames final offer was 9Mx8yrs and I really thought Lindholm would take it, I was absolutely wrong. I am not sure if it is the structure, the bonuses, or he thinks he can get more but I always believed this number would get it done. As I said before something strikes me in the way he doesn't seem to smile like the rest of the group or even give his best effort from what we saw in the pre-season. I am starting to believe this guy doesn't want to be here. Unfortunately it is too early to get a good return for him I think, the Flames are going to have to wait this one out for awhile. Very disappointing to me.
Well, I guess all the insiders agree then.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 08:34 PM   #8838
FormerPresJamesTaylor
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah_Baby View Post
Would be pretty funny if he ended up back there after they traded him to us.
FormerPresJamesTaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2023, 08:38 PM   #8839
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

The idea of post-apex Huberdeau and post-apex Lindholm chomping up 20 million of the Flames' cap space for years to come fills me with ennui.
flylock shox is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to flylock shox For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2023, 08:53 PM   #8840
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Lindholm had all of the leverage. The Flames have to much money invested in long term veterans to not sign their number 1C. Especially without anyone close to replacing him.

But if he is walking away from 9x8 in hopes of a bigger number he might be overplaying his hand a bit. If he gets hurt or has another ho hum season he might be leaving a lot of cash on the table.
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy