Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2023, 08:01 PM   #9141
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
That’s not my idea of freedom of speech.
What is your idea of freedom of speech?
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:08 PM   #9142
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi View Post
What is your idea of freedom of speech?
I actually like Musk’s definition.

“ A good sign as to whether there is free speech is, is someone you don’t like allowed to say something you don’t like? If that is the case, we have free speech. It’s damn annoying when someone you don’t like says something you don’t like. That is the sign of a healthy, functioning free speech situation.”
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:12 PM   #9143
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Seems to me the ones who hate this restriction the most are the ones who work in media or have platforms that broadcast media.

Wait a sec……
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:26 PM   #9144
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

So according to that definition of free speech, how does that snippet that Greenwald posted show a threat to that?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:32 PM   #9145
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

It’s good that we’re asking Yoho how this infringes on freedom of speech because that feels like a question he’ll definitely answer.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 10-01-2023, 08:36 PM   #9146
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

It's possible that by implementing clumsy requirements to provide information that people don't have or would be difficult to obtain and report would discourage or prevent some broadcasts... Basically dissuasion through bureaucracy, which is often a highly effective method. Especially if you happen to impose those regulations more strictly against certain types of broadcasts (not even necessarily based on their content).

It's essentially the same theory underlying voter ID laws - it doesn't really prevent anyone from voting, just adds extra compliance steps that some people just aren't going to be willing to undertake. If those people happen to tend to be your political opponents, well, what a coincidence.

Maybe this regime will be so easy and non-invasive that that won't be a real problem, I don't know. But it's certainly conceivable.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 10-01-2023, 08:45 PM   #9147
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Possibly, but if you're making > $10 million from your podcast or whatever, I think you'd just jump through the hoops to keep that going wouldn't you? Who's it really dissuading? Is there some contingent of successful social media stars that are like, "ah, screw this, too much work to comply!"
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:47 PM   #9148
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
It’s good that we’re asking Yoho how this infringes on freedom of speech because that feels like a question he’ll definitely answer.
It would be sad if he didn't take the opportunity to exercise his freedom of speech before Trudeau strips him of it.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:50 PM   #9149
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

I just can’t see the CRTC signing off on an individual or group that was highly critical of the ruling party with this.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:50 PM   #9150
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Possibly, but if you're making > $10 million from your podcast or whatever, I think you'd just jump through the hoops to keep that going wouldn't you? Who's it really dissuading? Is there some contingent of successful social media stars that are like, "ah, screw this, too much work to comply!"
Yeah the $10 million threshold probably alleviates most of the concerns - I guess the question is, is it $10 million in CANADIAN revenue? Because if you make a pittance from Canadians and most of your revenue is in the USA you might just not bother.

It will also as usual be a matter of how they implement the Cancon requirements but that sort of interference in broadcasting in Canada is nothing new.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:51 PM   #9151
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

We understand this doesn’t apply to individual podcasts, right?

YouTube has all your data, don’t worry.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:55 PM   #9152
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
We understand this doesn’t apply to individual podcasts, right?

YouTube has all your data, don’t worry.
Online services that offer podcasts must register.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:57 PM   #9153
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Online services that offer podcasts must register.
Correct. Do you understand that an online service that offers podcast is not a podcast, and that a podcast would be one of the podcasts that the online service offers, and would not have to register itself?

Spotify is an online service that offers podcasts. Joe Rogan is not, it’s a podcast.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 08:58 PM   #9154
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
I just can’t see the CRTC signing off on an individual or group that was highly critical of the ruling party with this.
Signing off on what exactly?
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 09:03 PM   #9155
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Correct. Do you understand that an online service that offers podcast is not a podcast, and that a podcast would be one of the podcasts that the online service offers, and would not have to register itself?

Spotify is an online service that offers podcasts. Joe Rogan is not, it’s a podcast.
So they would just get rid of Rumble or not authorize it.

YouTube censors on its own already.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 09:12 PM   #9156
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
So they would just get rid of Rumble or not authorize it.

YouTube censors on its own already.
Haha of course you’re concerned about Rumble. Had to look it up and that tracks.

Rumble is free to register just like every other online streaming service. Nobody is going to be “getting rid” of it or in charge of “authorizing” it.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 09:14 PM   #9157
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Haha of course you’re concerned about Rumble. Had to look it up and that tracks.

Rumble is free to register just like every other online streaming service. Nobody is going to be “getting rid” of it or in charge of “authorizing” it.
Would they not have to register or get CRTC approval?
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 09:37 PM   #9158
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Would they not have to register or get CRTC approval?
Yeah, they have to fill out a form. Extremely scary.

Nobody is authorizing them or approving them on the basis of what they put on the form, nor will they “get rid” of them. Traditional broadcasters actually need a license, telecommunications companies just need to register. This is far closer to the latter.

The only ones who will stop Rumble from operating in Canada is Rumble.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 09:54 PM   #9159
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Yeah, they have to fill out a form. Extremely scary.

Nobody is authorizing them or approving them on the basis of what they put on the form, nor will they “get rid” of them. Traditional broadcasters actually need a license, telecommunications companies just need to register. This is far closer to the latter.

The only ones who will stop Rumble from operating in Canada is Rumble.
I wish I had your confidence in the matter.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2023, 09:56 PM   #9160
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Did I read that right or did it say those that make over $10 million even have to worry about this?

This isn't some blanket crackdown on the average Canadian.

But I guess if Elon is upset, it must be important.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy