Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-2023, 08:04 PM   #6021
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
If that is true, then I’d don’t see how a deal doesn’t get done.
Hopefully because the Flames are running away. He shouldn't be getting that money or term.
Redrum is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Redrum For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 08:41 PM   #6022
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Seconded. It's a negotiation so negotiate it down to 4 years or walk away. How can any non-franchise player demand such a term at that age, and expect it? Silly organizations never learn.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 08:49 PM   #6023
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Pagnota is not reliable especially with Flames stuff.

He had us flipping Huberdeau minutes after the deal. Kadri an Islander the contract was sitting in Lou's drawer just needed to be registered.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 10:17 PM   #6024
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Pagnota is not reliable especially with Flames stuff.

He had us flipping Huberdeau minutes after the deal. Kadri an Islander the contract was sitting in Lou's drawer just needed to be registered.
Huh, then I guess a Lindholm trade is imminent…
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 03:34 AM   #6025
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Seconded. It's a negotiation so negotiate it down to 4 years or walk away. How can any non-franchise player demand such a term at that age, and expect it? Silly organizations never learn.
If the maximum the Flames will go is 4 years, they may as well pack up and go home.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 04:27 AM   #6026
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
Hopefully because the Flames are running away. He shouldn't be getting that money or term.
he will get it, or close to

here or elsewhere
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 05:51 AM   #6027
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
he will get it, or close to

here or elsewhere
It is pretty rare these days for the old guys to get max term on their contracts. The older guys like O’Reilly and others usually get less than max term. That being said, the Flames are an organization that likes giving out max term so you are probably correct.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 06:10 AM   #6028
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
It is pretty rare these days for the old guys to get max term on their contracts. The older guys like O’Reilly and others usually get less than max term. That being said, the Flames are an organization that likes giving out max term so you are probably correct.
Lindholm is 4 years younger than O’Reilly. O’Reilly just signed a 4 year contract . Lindholm signing an 8 year deal would make them the same age, at time of contracts are over .
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 07:05 AM   #6029
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
It is pretty rare these days for the old guys to get max term on their contracts. The older guys like O’Reilly and others usually get less than max term. That being said, the Flames are an organization that likes giving out max term so you are probably correct.
Potentially as he's a pending UFA. But other than pending UFA contracts they haven't hit 8 years once in my recollection.

Giordano's big deal was 6 years
Tkachuk's deal was 3
Monahan's big deal was 7
Lindholm's deal was 6

The only max term offers I can remember in recent years were to keep UFAs ... the one to Gaudreau and the two to the Florida players last year.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 07:18 AM   #6030
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
It is pretty rare these days for the old guys to get max term on their contracts. The older guys like O’Reilly and others usually get less than max term. That being said, the Flames are an organization that likes giving out max term so you are probably correct.
If Lindholm has another down year that is the only way I could see him settling for less than the 7 year max term if he went to free agency. He is the same age as Johnny was when he hit the market.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 07:30 AM   #6031
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Lindholm should get max term most likely but I am curious how much actual interest there is out there for him. I think Johnny was caught off guard by the lack of offers. I also think this limits trade partners because anyone trading for him as a rental likely doesn't want to give up a big package. Anyone who has interest long term might think it's better to wait until free agency.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 07:39 AM   #6032
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Would Lindholm really get max term on the open market?
I know a lot of GMs lack self control, but still. Like others have said, usually it's only the superstars who get max term at this age.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 07:43 AM   #6033
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Would Lindholm really get max term on the open market?
I know a lot of GMs lack self control, but still. Like others have said, usually it's only the superstars who get max term at this age.
Yes he would get 7 years on open market. He’s a top line centre that plays a 200’ game.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 08:33 AM   #6034
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

And I'd say every NHL GM knows this is exactly the type of player you add to a team ready to win to put you over the top.

He'll go for value if they don't sign him.

But they may need to wait for cap space to be generated through the season with how tight the market is.

Lindholm is the Butch Goring add.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 08:47 AM   #6035
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I'd say the chance of Lindholm signing any contract extension with the flames still lies sub 10%. He doesn't want to be here anymore. Accept it.

This talk about "what the flames are willing to accept" limited to a 1C is nonsense.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 09:06 AM   #6036
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
I'd say the chance of Lindholm signing any contract extension with the flames still lies sub 10%. He doesn't want to be here anymore. Accept it.

This talk about "what the flames are willing to accept" limited to a 1C is nonsense.
If he wasn’t open to staying I think he would have been like Hanifin and stated he wasn’t going to sign but will show up to camp etc. I think he is open to it but no discounts this time and will want to maximize his AAV
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 09:11 AM   #6037
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah I think he was genuine in saying he's on the fence with the fence being what happens to the other UFAs.

With only Toffoli moved I think he's still stuck on that fence; not enough decisions made to form his own.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2023, 09:30 AM   #6038
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
icon53

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
I'd say the chance of Lindholm signing any contract extension with the flames still lies sub 10%. He doesn't want to be here anymore. Accept it.

This talk about "what the flames are willing to accept" limited to a 1C is nonsense.
If he doesn't want to be here, why not just say it? Doesn't seem like the type to hide what he's feeling.

It seems way more likely at this point that he wants to be here with conditions. Money, winning, culture... Who knows.

I do know that overpaying him is going to feel like a huge blow. Anything over 8.5 will further cement Calgary as a player's doormat.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 09:33 AM   #6039
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

He is absolutely the type to hide what he's feeling. Certainly from the public and the media. He's one of the quietest most private players on the team. One of the reasons few people see him as Captain material. Doesn't like talking to the media.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 09:36 AM   #6040
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
He is absolutely the type to hide what he's feeling. Certainly from the public and the media. He's one of the quietest most private players on the team. One of the reasons few people see him as Captain material. Doesn't like talking to the media.
He doesn't have to say a word to the media. By all accounts he's been pretty vocal to the team management about direction. That has nothing to do with his public persona.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy