07-10-2023, 05:33 PM
|
#1221
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
|
Should be a year minimum if you were in the room in my opinion. Really send a message on this one is important for the game.
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 05:45 PM
|
#1222
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Should be a year minimum if you were in the room in my opinion. Really send a message on this one is important for the game.
|
One year is laughable IMO.
Lifetime ban is the only message to send about this nonsense. Please leave. GTFO. The game will not miss you. Players and HC officials alike.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
|
Aarongavey,
blender,
codynw,
Cole436,
Eric Vail,
FLAMESRULE,
Gondi Stylez,
Hockey_Ninja,
KelVarnsen,
Lanny'sDaMan,
redflamesfan08,
slybomb,
Vinny01,
You Need a Thneed
|
07-10-2023, 05:51 PM
|
#1223
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach
One year is laughable IMO.
Lifetime ban is the only message to send about this nonsense. Please leave. GTFO. The game will not miss you. Players and HC officials alike.
|
The adult who was plying the victim with alcohol should go to jail.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 05:52 PM
|
#1224
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Bob Nicholson still has a job somehow the Oilers are a disgrace.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:10 PM
|
#1225
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
I don’t think anyone would agree to this behaviour but what I do think is there has to be a medium for what’s a good punishment. Lifetime bans is excessive. 40 games for active players, lifetime ban for those not in the sport but want to work for Hockey Canada seems about right though, for those who were in the room. Those actively participating, give them a year. Scum. The old guy really should have the police scaring the crap out of him through some charges at least. What a guy.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:15 PM
|
#1226
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays
I don’t think anyone would agree to this behaviour but what I do think is there has to be a medium for what’s a good punishment. Lifetime bans is excessive. 40 games for active players, lifetime ban for those not in the sport but want to work for Hockey Canada seems about right though, for those who were in the room. Those actively participating, give them a year. Scum. The old guy really should have the police scaring the crap out of him through some charges at least. What a guy.
|
Why would players get less than those who are not players but want to work in the game? That does not seem to make sense.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:16 PM
|
#1227
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays
I don’t think anyone would agree to this behaviour but what I do think is there has to be a medium for what’s a good punishment. Lifetime bans is excessive. 40 games for active players, lifetime ban for those not in the sport but want to work for Hockey Canada seems about right though, for those who were in the room. Those actively participating, give them a year. Scum. The old guy really should have the police scaring the crap out of him through some charges at least. What a guy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach
One year is laughable IMO.
Lifetime ban is the only message to send about this nonsense. Please leave. GTFO. The game will not miss you. Players and HC officials alike.
|
I would be fine with a lifetime ban as well for players who were involved. I just figured one year minimum. The NHL should take a stands, lots of other guys who could take their place in the NHL.
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:19 PM
|
#1228
|
Franchise Player
|
I think a lifetime ban is excessive. The punishment needs to be stiff (no pun intended) but my concern would be what happens if the offenders include star players? The right thing is the right thing, regardless of the player(s).
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:26 PM
|
#1229
|
All I can get
|
Bettman won't ban anyone. Suspensions maybe, but not banned for life.
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:33 PM
|
#1230
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
|
A lifetime ban from Hockey Canada would be acceptable. I don’t expect anything from the NHL and am torn if there even should be.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Derek Sutton For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:37 PM
|
#1231
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Why would players get less than those who are not players but want to work in the game? That does not seem to make sense.
|
Meant
Active players involved directly should get a year
In the room but not participating six months (for not stopping it)
Either of the above but no longer in the game - lifetime ban from hockey Canada management
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:55 PM
|
#1232
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays
Meant
Active players involved directly should get a year
In the room but not participating six months (for not stopping it)
Either of the above but no longer in the game - lifetime ban from hockey Canada management
|
This doesn't answer why the actual perpetrators of the assault should receive a (substantially) lighter punishment than those not directly involved?
Why do we care about the hockey careers of these people? Some people's hockey careers have ended because of a bunk knee, or because they missed a pass one time. These plugs are lucky not to be going to jail. Why do they need to be back tainting the game with the stink of this crap? Just get gone.
__________________
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 06:59 PM
|
#1233
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach
This doesn't answer why the actual perpetrators of the assault should receive a (substantially) lighter punishment than those not directly involved?
Why do we care about the hockey careers of these people? Some people's hockey careers have ended because of a bunk knee, or because they missed a pass one time. These plugs are lucky not to be going to jail. Why do they need to be back tainting the game with the stink of this crap? Just get gone.
|
The average person has 4 or 5 different careers. I am sure there are other jobs guys can do it they get a lifetime suspension.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 07:04 PM
|
#1234
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Can someone remind me where we’re at in the legal process with all this? And will the Hockey Canada investigation possibly open that back up again?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bagofpucks For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 07:49 PM
|
#1235
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton
A lifetime ban from Hockey Canada would be acceptable. I don’t expect anything from the NHL and am torn if there even should be.
|
I think the NHL has a moral obligation to decide which types of individuals they want representing their brand.
So while I would agree that this falls outside their parameters with regards to imposing punishments, I disagree that they don’t have any responsibility here. They have a responsibility to protect their own image here.
Any guilty parties should have their contracts terminated immediately. Not only is it the right thing to do morally, it’s also the right thing to do from a business perspective. This isn’t a particularly divisive issue.
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 07:58 PM
|
#1236
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
|
Playing in the NHL is a privilege. Sexual assault is a crime. Any and every player that commits sexual assault should be banned for life.
|
|
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to KelVarnsen For This Useful Post:
|
activeStick,
AndyM,
Ashasx,
bdubbs,
cam_wmh,
emti,
Gallick,
Gondi Stylez,
Hockey_Ninja,
Jetfire,
Jiri Hrdina,
Lanny'sDaMan,
Nandric,
redforever,
undercoverbrother,
Wormius
|
07-10-2023, 09:20 PM
|
#1237
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KelVarnsen
Playing in the NHL is a privilege. Sexual assault is a crime. Any and every player that commits sexual assault should be banned for life.
|
The Oilers will be really angry about their stream of low on morals players being cut off.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-10-2023, 11:25 PM
|
#1238
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
I think it's important to see how the NHL is handling the Joel Quenneville, Stan Bowman, Bill Peters situation etc as a barometer to how it will be dealt with at the player level. Even Mike Babcock who is back in the league after some rumored nasty methods and contact with players is back coaching after getting his full salary.
Lifetime bans , long term suspensions of 1 year etc, contract terminations and things like that I don't see happening for a large amount of players.
If one or more of the players is charged with sexual assault or a crime and then has to go through the legal process and is found guilty, that's an example that could warrant something like a 1 year suspension, lifetime Hockey Canada ban etc.
Simply being in the room, knowing something but not reporting it, taunting or other very crude behavior is a different matter from a legal perspective. The punishments will vary depending on what the new investigation by the London, Ontario police also reveals
This is a very messy and really bad looking situation for a lot of people and if a crime has been committed and charges are laid, that's an important distinction. I am not condoning the behavior or anything. I am not, so hopefully the usual suspects don't pile on.
Just because Joe Public would like to see extreme punishment and millions in contracts voided for alleged offenses 5 years ago, doesn't mean it will happen because of legal risk back to the NHL and their respective teams.
Perhaps an employment lawyer may chime in with a better explanation but unless the player is in violation of their contract, would teams have grounds for termination of the contract for something that MAY have happened prior? (no charges laid) The NHLPA and NHL may need to then negotiate a settlement but what happens after? If the player is NHL caliber and is thus being prevented from gaining employment in the NHL afterwards due to backlash, would they be entitled to compensation? Would that count as employment discrimination?
What if specific teams knew of specific offenses about a player, choose to withhold that information, traded the player while keeping things quite, would they be on the hook for compensation of a contract?
Being fired with cause as an employee is a lot more rare than people think. Even in the workplace if a crime may have been committed by the employee like theft, harassment, rules/ regulations of an industry being broken etc, then employers will pay out severance, offer a basic letter of employment and be done with it.
As I said previously, I am not condoning sexual assault or anything but looking at where this might get a lot messier and complicated than people think.
Regardless, I do feel awful for the victim and I hope she is getting support and is able to move on in her life after all this comes out. It won't be easy and this will be highly public with a lot still to come out.
|
|
|
07-10-2023, 11:48 PM
|
#1239
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KelVarnsen
Playing in the NHL is a privilege. Sexual assault is a crime. Any and every player that commits sexual assault should be banned for life.
|
Totally agree, I don't know the full story but as far as I know there hasn't been any sexual assault charges yet, I'm not willing to support a ban on a bunch of players if the cops don't think there's a case.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2023, 02:37 AM
|
#1240
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KelVarnsen
Playing in the NHL is a privilege. Sexual assault is a crime. Any and every player that commits sexual assault should be banned for life.
|
I think at least one or two fools need to go to jail.
"Banned for life from the NHL?"
So what?
Its a CRIME. Bake 'em away Toys!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.
|
|