Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2023, 08:59 AM   #881
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

From reading the comments, it sounds like many wanted the trade to look like Toffoli for Younger Toffoli + 3rd round pick. That was never going to happen, and judging Conroy based on that framework is unrealistic.

My second comment is that you can't be excited about the Flames getting picks for this upcoming draft while also panning the Flames for picking up a young, somewhat unproven NHL player. It's the same talent identification process. If you don't think they can identify talent, then there's no sense in wanting the Flames to take the direction of rebuilding through multiple trades that accumulate draft picks.

In a theoretical world, I would have liked it if Conroy could have pushed the 3rd round pick to a 2nd with some salary retention (assuming NJ had one). But I would not have done that if I was New Jersey... I'd rather pay $1-2 million in salary than give up a second rounder.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Fan, Ph.D. For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 09:13 AM   #882
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I get Toffoli wanting to cash in, he's never going to have an offense in the NHL structured around him again like it was in 22-23.

He was stapled to the top Center with Lindholm all season. It's interesting how when Huberdeau-Lindholm-Toffoli wasn't working it was Toffoli thay never got shuffled off the line, and how they never split up Lindholm and Toffoli even though having our only 2 RH shot forwards on the same line never made sense.

He was the focal point of a PP that got him lots of points but wasn't very effective overall, and had Lindholm and Huberdeau reduced to support pieces.

I posted it already but I'm intrigued to see what his stats are next year when he's likely on the second line and second PP unit.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:19 AM   #883
JohnnyB
Franchise Player
 
JohnnyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Shanghai
Exp:
Default

I'm not sure how anyone could really see trading your number one scorer for a 30 point forward and a pick as a win now move. It looks like a move that makes the Flames substantially worse on the ice for the upcoming season. If these are the kinds of moves they make with Lindholm, Hannifin and Backlund, the Flames are going to be a much worse team in 23-24. This trade sets a standard suited for those hoping to see the team tank and go into a rebuild.
__________________

"If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?"
JohnnyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:19 AM   #884
Wood
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exp:
Default

I do wonder where Toffoli will fit in with NJ. 5v5 and on PP

They already have an elite, pure shooter in Timo Meier who's going to be above Toffoli on the depth chart. They're going to want to get Holtz in there and he's a pure shooter as well

Hughes is amazing at a lot of things but he's an extremely high shot-volume player. I think Toffoli being a pure perimeter shooter took away from Lindholms strengths as a shooter in the slot

The reason Sharangovich was on the block is because they already had too many guys of a similar build
Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:20 AM   #885
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
No it’s more likely that he didn’t counter aggressively enough, again obviously just guessing here. He has a new relationship management thing he has to get going with 31 GMs and the establishment of a reputation to consider. But, put yourself in NJ’s shoes. If he asked you for a 2nd, would you still do the trade? I would.
Why guess about things that may or may not have been offered.

It's not like it's Conroy and three summer interns in charge. He has two guys that have been GMs beside him in multiple cities.

No point in pretending that he could have gotten better when there is zero reason to believe that.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 09:21 AM   #886
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

This is a calculated gamble on trying to get a player about to break through. Compare his first few years to a player like Mangipane and Sharangovich is there or even a bit ahead. Mangipane had his break out year in a contract season. Here is hoping Conroy can get Sharangovich signed to a friendly contract before he pops. As someone mentioned, he is already one of the more productive players from the 2018, there is something there.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:25 AM   #887
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Have never understood the quick jump to face off percentages in assessing a center.

The reads and 200 foot game required to play the position by far out weigh the ability to win a face off.

Iginla used to take draws for his center and then move back to the wing defensively.

Monahan took most of the draws but went the wing often for Lindholm to play the center ice position.

(and not saying Sharngovich is a 200 foot center whizz, but it would take more analysis then face off counts to prove either way)
You're not wrong, but 36% in the do is a major red flag if the team expect him to play center, even if his 200ft game is stout. Now the Flames can maximize his ability with strong side only faceoffs etc. and having a winger take draws on the weak side, but he does need to shore that area up.

An exciting young player nonetheless. I would expect the Flames to try and sign him to a 4-5 year deal that could turn out to be a bargain off the back of a down year last year.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:25 AM   #888
Wood
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exp:
Default

Sorry if already mentioned, but Friedman suggested on his podcast that Chris Snow most likely pushed for Sharangovich due to his analytics
Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wood For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 09:30 AM   #889
annasuave
Scoring Winger
 
annasuave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Wrong thread
annasuave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:30 AM   #890
sketchyt
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

Reading through the Devils subreddit since I've barely seen this guy play (although there seem to be a lot of experts in this thread about him). Here's what I picked up:
  • Good on PK
  • Great shot
  • Good teammate/attitude
  • Struggled in a bottom six role
  • Lots of untapped potential
  • Sad to see him go
So far, I see this trade as a win/win for both teams. Cap space and draft picks in the first three rounds isn't cheap to come by.
sketchyt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:42 AM   #891
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I just think the market is a bit soft. I still think the Flames had to trade Toffoli now, rather than risk the deadline. It becomes a difficult thing to try and sell a player at the deadline when your team is in the race, especially if they are holding a playoff spot. Not many teams do it. Also, injuries happen, and we have also seen trade deadlines that were very soft as well.


If a lot of GMs decide not to trade away some of the players that they were hoping to because the market is a little soft, then the deadline will probably be soft as well.



I am underwhelmed by this trade no matter how people try to rationalize it. However, that's just what a soft market is. I am sure that Conroy accepted the best package for Toffoli, period.



I didn't want the Flames heading into the year with Toffoli. I also don't want them to go in with Tanev as I feel he is an injury risk to try and wait for the deadline - otherwise I would much prefer to wait until the deadline.


You always 'lose' the trade when you give up the best player in the deal, but contracts matter. Sarangovich will most likely get more opportunity here in Calgary this year, and who knows? Maybe he takes a big step forward, and this trade will look lopsided the other way. That's what the Flames have banked on, and they probably have watched a lot more video on him than most people here, and have put him through their analytics to figure out if he was a good target or not (as claimed by Friedman). This trade could be a great trade with hindsight, especially with what I perceive as a soft market.


I am definitely underwhelmed, as it stands right now, but I wouldn't call it disastrous. It has potential, and this is a soft market.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:43 AM   #892
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB View Post
I'm not sure how anyone could really see trading your number one scorer for a 30 point forward and a pick as a win now move. It looks like a move that makes the Flames substantially worse on the ice for the upcoming season. If these are the kinds of moves they make with Lindholm, Hannifin and Backlund, the Flames are going to be a much worse team in 23-24. This trade sets a standard suited for those hoping to see the team tank and go into a rebuild.
If you're gonna tank you should go full tank. Which is why this deal is so baffling. We're going to back ourselves into being a bottom feeder and burn our only assets in the process. Brilliant!
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:43 AM   #893
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Why guess about things that may or may not have been offered.

It's not like it's Conroy and three summer interns in charge. He has two guys that have been GMs beside him in multiple cities.

No point in pretending that he could have gotten better when there is zero reason to believe that.
Yeah no sense criticizing the negotiating process. It does seem like the Flames put a higher value on this player than others around the league (at least based on some of the articles I have seen). Time will tell if they got it right. At least they got younger and made a bet on potential.
Strange Brew is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:45 AM   #894
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
Goes both ways, bud.
Pretty sure "bud" is the most cringeworthy thing you can call someone you don't know.

Thanks for that.

I'm not a fan of labeling either way.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:45 AM   #895
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Most important consideration - what are we going to call this guy on here because there is no way anyone is going to write out that full name correctly on a regular basis.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:48 AM   #896
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Most important consideration - what are we going to call this guy on here because there is no way anyone is going to write out that full name correctly on a regular basis.
It's pronounced "I-gor"
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2023, 09:51 AM   #897
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Eye gore?
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:52 AM   #898
Ziggy Lidstrom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ziggy Lidstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Im profoundly disappointed in people leaking trade demands. It has lowered the return for toffoli and doesn’t inspire me to think that hanifin and lindholm and backlund will return market value.

This org needs to tighten the ship. Loose lips sink trade values.
__________________
My Sig is terrible...le sigh
Ziggy Lidstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:52 AM   #899
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDN View Post
We might just draft the next Johnny G.
Those are 4th round picks where we do that.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2023, 09:55 AM   #900
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Most important consideration - what are we going to call this guy on here because there is no way anyone is going to write out that full name correctly on a regular basis.
Sharon
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy