06-25-2023, 10:58 PM
|
#501
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Benn is garbage and that would hurt my fandom for this team.
Also the precise opposite thing you should be doing with a trade chip like Lindholm.
|
|
|
06-25-2023, 11:11 PM
|
#502
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I hear ya bud. This talk of acquiring Jamie Benn though would put me damn close though. I hate Jamie Benn! I hate Jamie Benn more than any other player I can think of in history. Brian Marchment was a tough one to swallow but I endured. Todd Bertuzzi was puke worthy but I got through that. Jamie fn Benn though...please Christ no!
|
I passionately hate Jamie Benn. That would be the toughest pill, probably worse than Bert I agree
|
|
|
06-25-2023, 11:37 PM
|
#503
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
I really don't care about how I perceive a player to be honest. All that matters is what they bring to the team and Benn would be an incredible misfit with where this team is right now. Like a catastrophic misfit.
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:05 AM
|
#504
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
Why'd he take a discount to Horvat?
|
When you're desperate like Lou was, you see overpays. You give up some nice pieces at the deadline for an expiring deal, you're just asking to be screwed on the contract. If I were an Islanders fan, I'd hate it as much as I would as a flames fan. Hell, even Lou hated that deal and said as much as the ink was drying.
Let's not overpay our own guys. Don't act out of desperation. Make a plan and stick with it when the easy thing to do is just offer another mil.
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:18 AM
|
#505
|
Franchise Player
|
8x8 is 64M
Is Lindholm really going to make more than that on another team? possible, risky though
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:24 AM
|
#506
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
I've seen this mentioned a lot about Weegar, and it's got me wondering what it really means...
People used to praise Russell for being the best shot blocking D in the league, until someone pointed out that it's because the rest of his play lead to all the shots that needed to be blocked in the first place.
Is suppression the new blocking? It seems to me that having to suppress a shot really just means that your team doesn't have possession of the puck. Wouldn't a D who excels at helping to get and/or maintain puck possession be more valuable than a D who excels at what happens when you don't have possession?
|
I can only tell you my interpretation, but based on that, it’s the exact opposite of what you’re wondering.
Russell blocked a lot of shots because teams had no trouble generating shots against when he was on the ice. Bless him for accounting for that, and making up for it. Dude is a true warrior.
Among defenders who played at least 1400 minutes at even strength, Weegar ranks #1 in shots against per 60 minutes - 21.2. Drew Doughty at 24.89 ranks second.
He’s even better on the PK - he’s on the ice for like 38 shots per 60 - Hanifin, for comparison, is around 53 on the PK (played nearly 100 more PK minutes as well - baffling)
When Weegar is on the ice, opportunities to take shots on Calgary’s net are hard to come by. He excels at denying entry at the blue line, and he’s a fantastic transition player.
He doesn’t allow the puck into the zone, and when it does, he gets it out quick. Can’t shoot if you’re offside.
It’s why he’s also the best D on the team for Goals Against/60, and why he’s 15 shots better than Hanifin on the PK.
He’s the most out of place player on the roster, in that he’s actually better than we’re paying him, and he decided to stay.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
Last edited by GreenLantern2814; 06-26-2023 at 09:58 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 35 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
Ashasx,
Bankai,
bax,
BeltlineFan,
BigFlameDog,
bluejays,
btimbit,
Calgary4LIfe,
Cali Panthers Fan,
camm13,
Cycling76er,
DeluxeMoustache,
Demaeon,
FanIn80,
Flames1217,
FlamesAddiction,
flamesgod,
ForeverFlameFan,
Gondi Stylez,
handgroen,
Hockey_Ninja,
jaikorven,
jayswin,
Joborule,
Loudog,
MrMike,
rogermexico,
Rollin22x,
Sandman,
Scroopy Noopers,
Simon96Taco,
SnipeShow,
Stillman16,
Textcritic,
Tkachukwagon
|
06-26-2023, 10:39 AM
|
#507
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
I can only tell you my interpretation, but based on that, it’s the exact opposite of what you’re wondering.
Russell blocked a lot of shots because teams had no trouble generating shots against when he was on the ice. Bless him for accounting for that, and making up for it. Dude is a true warrior.
Among defenders who played at least 1400 minutes at even strength, Weegar ranks #1 in shots against per 60 minutes - 21.2. Drew Doughty at 24.89 ranks second.
He’s even better on the PK - he’s on the ice for like 38 shots per 60 - Hanifin, for comparison, is around 53 on the PK (played nearly 100 more PK minutes as well - baffling)
When Weegar is on the ice, opportunities to take shots on Calgary’s net are hard to come by. He excels at denying entry at the blue line, and he’s a fantastic transition player.
He doesn’t allow the puck into the zone, and when it does, he gets it out quick. Can’t shoot if you’re offside.
It’s why he’s also the best D on the team for Goals Against/60, and why he’s 15 shots better than Hanifin on the PK.
He’s the most out of place player on the roster, in that he’s actually better than we’re paying him, and he decided to stay.
|
Thanks, that makes sense.
I was looking at it from the perspective of "you can't shoot if you don't have the puck," so not giving them the puck is more valuable than suppressing shots. Which led me to wonder if a guy like Makar doesn't rate favourably in shot suppression because the other team just doesn't have the puck enough to generate as many suppression opportunities.
I didn't realize the stat was simply a quantitative measure of shots against though (in other words, possession is intrinsically factored in).
Edit: Or... in even more other words, I was wrong lol.
Last edited by FanIn80; 06-26-2023 at 10:50 AM.
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 11:36 AM
|
#508
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Unless you're Vegas
|
Florida hasn't picked in the top ten since 2014.
Dallas has 1 top ten pick since 2009
Carolina has had 4 top ten picks in the past ten years - but more of them play on the Flames than they do for the Hurricanes.
Outside of the Oilers (who took about 15 tries to get it right) its not exactly a huge correlation to being terrible and then winning.
The 2018 draft was 5 years ago:
1. Buffalo (still haven't made the playoffs)- still rebuilding
2. Carolina - they are good
3. Montreal - one of the worst teams in the league
4. Ottawa - still rebuilding
5. Arizona - still rebuilding
6. Detroit - still rebuilding
7. Vancouver - doing whatever they do
8. Chicago - still rebuilding
9. Rangers - they are good - although really none of their high picks worked out
10. Edmonton - 15 year rebuild finally ended.
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 11:42 AM
|
#509
|
Franchise Player
|
One of the reason is very very few players actually come into the NHL and make any impact before their 21/22 year old season
The Flames were actually the exception with Monahan and MT. This is very rare .
So rebuilds should be 4-5 years from the first “star” being drafted if you are starting fresh
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 11:58 AM
|
#510
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
One of the reason is very very few players actually come into the NHL and make any impact before their 21/22 year old season
The Flames were actually the exception with Monahan and MT. This is very rare .
So rebuilds should be 4-5 years from the first “star” being drafted if you are starting fresh
|
Even the two 'good' teams on those lists - their star players are not high picks made during their rebuild.
For Carolina - Aho was a 2nd round pick, Necas was picked 12th overall, Slavin was a 4th round pick.
For the Rangers - Panarin (signed as a FA) - undrafted, Zibanejad - was a top ten pick by Ottawa in 2011 and acquired via a trade for not very much, Adam Fox - we all know this one but was a 3rd round pick, Shesterkin - 4th round pick
Zibanejad would actually be a decent comp for Lindholm - Swede, high pick, sputtered in his early career, traded, broke out at age 26 and just set a career high in points at age 29/30.
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 11:59 AM
|
#511
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
The Flames were actually the exception with Monahan and MT. This is very rare .
|
This. Nobody was expecting the turnaround to happen so fast. Unfortunately a couple of bad contracts prevented the team from truly building a consistent top 10 team.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:05 PM
|
#513
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214
Live shot of Conroy.
|
Me, still trying to understand this gif:
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:07 PM
|
#514
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
The gun is smoking. He pulled the trigger?
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:09 PM
|
#515
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Oh no...
https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...with-a-shotgun
Quote:
monkey-with-a-shotgun
Someone who isn't qualified to make life or death decisions, but is still entrusted with the power to do so.
|
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:09 PM
|
#516
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Me, still trying to understand this gif:

|
Pretty sure it’s Conny laughing at what Lindholm’s camp is demanding $$$ wise
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:09 PM
|
#517
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Laughing at the demands.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:13 PM
|
#518
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CGY
|
Sec214 comes in again with a post that can mean dozens of things, and we will all overthink its meaning im sure. Well Done Sec, well done. Keep this thread on kicking it!
|
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:13 PM
|
#519
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin
I really don't care about how I perceive a player to be honest. All that matters is what they bring to the team and Benn would be an incredible misfit with where this team is right now. Like a catastrophic misfit.
|
I am 100% confident that any player we bring in, no matter how hated, will be considered a great acquisition before game one in October.
__________________
I have Strong opinions about things I know very little about.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Icantwhisper For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-26-2023, 12:14 PM
|
#520
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
What if one of Lindholm's demands was actually a monkey with a gun?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.
|
|