Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2023, 09:11 AM   #81
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
He might play better sure

He went to CBJ to float with no pressure though...that is the lol
No he didn't.
He went to CBJ because it was the last good offer on the table after over playing his cards.

He has never had an issue playing hard and certainly isn't a floater.

Gaudreau aside, I don't get this for Babcock. CBJ isn't close to being a competitor; he'll be coaching a rebuild.
I guess he needs a path back into the league and has to take what he can now.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 09:19 AM   #82
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
No he didn't.
He went to CBJ because it was the last good offer on the table after over playing his cards.

He has never had an issue playing hard and certainly isn't a floater.

Gaudreau aside, I don't get this for Babcock. CBJ isn't close to being a competitor; he'll be coaching a rebuild.
I guess he needs a path back into the league and has to take what he can now.
Never?



Floating all over the place, didn't even challenge Draisaitl.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 09:53 AM   #83
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
No he didn't.
He went to CBJ because it was the last good offer on the table after over playing his cards.

He has never had an issue playing hard and certainly isn't a floater.

Gaudreau aside, I don't get this for Babcock. CBJ isn't close to being a competitor; he'll be coaching a rebuild.
I guess he needs a path back into the league and has to take what he can now.
Did you only watch him the game in Calgary last season?

He was a big time floater last year his coach even called out his defensive play in the media. 74 points and -33
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 10:28 AM   #84
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Never?



Floating all over the place, didn't even challenge Draisaitl.
He made the wrong play and took the point.
Stupid play yes, but I wouldn't say being a floater was ever his issue in Calgary.
He also scored a series winning goal that year, something a whopping 3 Flames have done in 33 years.

You probably think Tkachuk & Bennett are floaters too.

I was as pissed as anyone with how Gaudreau left, but this need to re write history for every former Flame is lame.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Old 06-04-2023, 10:33 AM   #85
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
Literally zero chance.
BS. You are absolutely wrong. So you think if the Flames offered Lindholm, pick #16, Coronato, and next year's 1st for #3 the Jackets say no? Of course they wouldn't. Would the Flames offer that? Almost certainly not but saying there is "literally zero chance" the two teams can't come to an agreement where Lindholm and other assets go to the Jackets for #3 is BS.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 10:47 AM   #86
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
BS. You are absolutely wrong. So you think if the Flames offered Lindholm, pick #16, Coronato, and next year's 1st for #3 the Jackets say no? Of course they wouldn't. Would the Flames offer that? Almost certainly not but saying there is "literally zero chance" the two teams can't come to an agreement where Lindholm and other assets go to the Jackets for #3 is BS.
If Columbus are smart they say no. Even if they are dumb they likely say no.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 10:50 AM   #87
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
BS. You are absolutely wrong. So you think if the Flames offered Lindholm, pick #16, Coronato, and next year's 1st for #3 the Jackets say no? Of course they wouldn't. Would the Flames offer that? Almost certainly not but saying there is "literally zero chance" the two teams can't come to an agreement where Lindholm and other assets go to the Jackets for #3 is BS.
You kind of proved his point though we aren't going to offer that package.

The reason I can see it happening is for some reason they seem desperate to compete after finishing at the bottom of the league.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:08 AM   #88
DylanScores
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dirty Deep South Baby!
Exp:
Default

I don’t Lindholm will not go to CBJ. If he didn’t have fun with Sutter, I don’t he will have fun with Babcock as well!
DylanScores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:27 AM   #89
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
He made the wrong play and took the point.
Stupid play yes, but I wouldn't say being a floater was ever his issue in Calgary.
He also scored a series winning goal that year, something a whopping 3 Flames have done in 33 years.

You probably think Tkachuk & Bennett are floaters too.

I was as pissed as anyone with how Gaudreau left, but this need to re write history for every former Flame is lame.
I didn't say anything about Tkachuk or Bennett. Kind of presumptuous. Nor am I rewriting history. Watch the video and see if he's floating or not.

Hanifin goes to retrieve the shoot in and chips it up the boards to where the winger is supposed to be to get it out. Except he realizes it's Gaudreau who isn't going to participate in any board play and has to go deal with Draisaitl himself. Too late and the Flames lose the series.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:46 AM   #90
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
If Columbus are smart they say no. Even if they are dumb they likely say no.
Which confirms what we all knew, that you know the square root of F all about values in hockey. Basically the value of 4 1sts and the Jackets say no? Lmao, you're funny.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:52 AM   #91
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
You kind of proved his point though we aren't going to offer that package.

The reason I can see it happening is for some reason they seem desperate to compete after finishing at the bottom of the league.
Not really though because I was using that as an exaggeration to show nothing is literally zero chance. The biggest moron GM ever wouldn't turn that down (apparently not by one on this board). A deal can be made, it just depends on the price. We have no idea if the 3rd overall pick is play so saying their is literally zero chance is inaccurate.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:53 AM   #92
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Which confirms what we all knew, that you know the square root of F all about values in hockey. Basically the value of 4 1sts and the Jackets say no? Lmao, you're funny.
Its not the value of 4 1sts though and even if it was 4 1sts isn't worth the 3rd overall pick this year. Again there is a reason teams don't trade these top picks very often. The value they bring in a cap world making them very valuable.

Columbus makes that deal and they are no further along in terms of winning the Cup. It makes no sense at all for them to make that move.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:58 AM   #93
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
Its not the value of 4 1sts though and even if it was 4 1sts isn't worth the 3rd overall pick this year. Again there is a reason teams don't trade these top picks very often. The value they bring in a cap world making them very valuable.

Columbus makes that deal and they are no further along in terms of winning the Cup. It makes no sense at all for them to make that move.
Wrong again. Lindholm's value is a 1st+. Coronato was a 1st rnd pick and his value is such now. The other two are literally current 1st rnd picks. That deal absolutely makes the Jackets a much better team than just picking at 3. Thanks for proving my point though, you are absolutely clueless on values. The Jackets would jump on that so fast and Conroy would be run out of town, Conroy would never offer that though because that is beyond a ridiculous overpayment, it was used as an exaggeration to show nothing is zero chance and you think it's bad for Columbus? Oh boy! Lol
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:59 AM   #94
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
Its not the value of 4 1sts though and even if it was 4 1sts isn't worth the 3rd overall pick this year. Again there is a reason teams don't trade these top picks very often. The value they bring in a cap world making them very valuable.

Columbus makes that deal and they are no further along in terms of winning the Cup. It makes no sense at all for them to make that move.
That suggested offer was:

Lindholm (1st)
2023 1st (1st)
Coronato (1st)
2024 1st (1st).

Lindholm is no bust and Coronato doesn't seem to be. How do you figure that it's not the value of four first round picks?
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:59 AM   #95
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

okay everybody just calm down
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 06-04-2023, 12:03 PM   #96
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Babcock took a stacked team to a cup. Once. Bowman took a stacked team to 5 cups. Then he took another one to a cup. Then he took another one to three cups. Plus he took the expansion Blues to 3 cup finals right off the bat at the start of his career.

Babcock has the same amount of cups as Terry Crisp and Bob Hartley. In somewhat similar circumstances. I’m not sure his Olympic win is the sign of a great coach, though his input on team makeup was important I guess.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 12:05 PM   #97
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
That suggested offer was:

Lindholm (1st)
2023 1st (1st)
Coronato (1st)
2024 1st (1st).

Lindholm is no bust and Coronato doesn't seem to be. How do you figure that it's not the value of four first round picks?
I think it is very debatable whether you could get a first round pick at this point for Coronato. Doesn't mean that he is a bust or terrible.

And as I said I am not sure 4 1sts is good value for the 3rd overall pick in this draft.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 12:16 PM   #98
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
I think it is very debatable whether you could get a first round pick at this point for Coronato. Doesn't mean that he is a bust or terrible.

And as I said I am not sure 4 1sts is good value for the 3rd overall pick in this draft.
You said Columbus would be stupid to do that deal, your words. You really think it's debatable the Flames could not get a 1st rnd pick for Coronato? He was a 1st the puck and he has only excelled since, coming off an excellent World's. How has his value fallen?
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 12:18 PM   #99
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Babcock took a stacked team to a cup. Once. Bowman took a stacked team to 5 cups. Then he took another one to a cup. Then he took another one to three cups. Plus he took the expansion Blues to 3 cup finals right off the bat at the start of his career.

Babcock has the same amount of cups as Terry Crisp and Bob Hartley. In somewhat similar circumstances. I’m not sure his Olympic win is the sign of a great coach, though his input on team makeup was important I guess.
I think that Olympic win was the most impressive considering he got them to buy into that defensive style of play to win.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 12:20 PM   #100
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
You said Columbus would be stupid to do that deal, your words. You really think it's debatable the Flames could not get a 1st rnd pick for Coronato? He was a 1st the puck and he has only excelled since, coming off an excellent World's. How has his value fallen?
First, he wasn't excellent at the World's, he was fine and he hasn't excelled either he has been good, no need to exaggerate.

Yes Columbus would be stupid to make that deal. The 3rd overall pick, especially in this draft has incredible value. This isn't a Flames things, this isn't criticizing the pieces that would be coming from the Flames it is a comment on how valuable top picks are, especially in a year with such high top end talent in a draft.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spurs For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy