Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2023, 12:04 PM   #15541
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

I'm not convinced that cbj would trade 3oa but the more I think about it I could see some logic.

I think it would have to be something lindholm+16th oa for 3oa. Or coronato instead of the 16th oa.

What are the chances that Leo Carlsson is a more impactful player then lindholm over the next 5 years? Add in known chemistry with Gaudreau and cbj with lindholm looks like a playoff team next season. Add in the 16th and they still have a huge prospect pool and 2 1sts this season.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:07 PM   #15542
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Flames

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
I'm not convinced that cbj would trade 3oa but the more I think about it I could see some logic.

I think it would have to be something lindholm+16th oa for 3oa. Or coronato instead of the 16th oa.

What are the chances that Leo Carlsson is a more impactful player then lindholm over the next 5 years? Add in known chemistry with Gaudreau and cbj with lindholm looks like a playoff team next season. Add in the 16th and they still have a huge prospect pool and 2 1sts this season.
If Conroy trades Lindholm and Coronato for #3 I will lead the lynch mob.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:08 PM   #15543
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Not even teams in tear-it-down rebuilds dress 7 rookies in their lineup. I imagine Huberdeau and Kadri would be very unhappy with that kind of strip-down, and making them happy is job 1 for next season.
Most of these guys aren't 19-21 either. Some are pushing 24/25.

I'm sure all 7 won't make the team but I'd give all 7 a chance to make the team.

Ruzikcka has 75 career games too. Are you suggesting he is a rookie still?
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:08 PM   #15544
Icantwhisper
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
If Conroy trades Lindholm and Coronato for #3 I will lead the lynch mob.
It'll just be you, so really easy to organize
__________________
I have Strong opinions about things I know very little about.
Icantwhisper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Icantwhisper For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2023, 12:09 PM   #15545
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
If Conroy trades Lindholm and Coronato for #3 I will lead the lynch mob.
You want a franchise center to replace Lindholm? It isn't that bad IMO
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:09 PM   #15546
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
This is an advantage of going into a season with the mindset that we are doing a retool. You are more likely to look at these players.

There were tons of people on CP that had no interest the day he was on waivers. The mentality was we are gunning for the playoffs and he's been bad in Nashville. More likely to take a chance on a guy like this if you aren't gunning for the playoffs.

Of course, Seattle made it to the playoffs and got a guy that put up 30 goal pace for them, is 24 and is team controlled for a few years.
I wanted him the day he was on waivers but people were arguing he’d block Phillips lol
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:17 PM   #15547
GFG#1
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
They could have an agreement in place and the July 1st signatures being more of a formality.
Technically that would be tampering, as they can not talk extensions with players until they are in the final year of the Contract, which is July 1st. Now it obviously happens all the time, and the NHL doesn't say much about it, however, it is slightly different if you make a trade with Columbus on the basis that a deal is in placed and will be signed July 1st.

I actually think the NHL would penalize that kind of deal, especially if word got out, and it may not if all goes well, but if you decide to trade him to someone else, or Lindholm decides not to sign that extension it is likely you get ratted out.

So IMO if the Flames want to trade Lindholm to CBJ for 3rd overall at the draft it is on the basis of he has 1 year left until UFA. Or wait until July 1 sign Lindholm and then trade him for the Player Columbus picked.
GFG#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:17 PM   #15548
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
You want a franchise center to replace Lindholm? It isn't that bad IMO
What franchise centre??? There is absolutely no guarantee a player taken at 3 is going to be a franchise centre. The NHL draft history is full of 3rd overall picks that never become impact players let alone franchise players. So you want to trade a Selke contending #1 C plus our best forward prospect whom plays a position we need youth in and is showing really well against men at the World's for a magic bean?? That is fn insanity. The good news is Conroy is not remotely that stupid.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2023, 12:20 PM   #15549
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Re: Columbus.

If they really want to get out of the rebuild and get to "going for it" I think Lindholm and Hanifin could be a combo they'd be into.

To CBJ: Elias Lindholm (extended), Noah Hanifin (extended)
To CGY: 3rd Overall, 34th overall

Not sure if Calgary would have to maybe include the 49th Overall pick to make that work? The premium to be paid for a 3rd overall has to be significant.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2023, 12:23 PM   #15550
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Re: Columbus.

If they really want to get out of the rebuild and get to "going for it" I think Lindholm and Hanifin could be a combo they'd be into.

To CBJ: Elias Lindholm (extended), Noah Hanifin (extended)
To CGY: 3rd Overall, 34th overall
Jesus, that is even worse. It boggles my mind how much people overrate draft picks. Go do some research on how many first rnd draft picks make an impact in the NHL compared to what their projection is. Many don't even make the show. I get the rebuild crowd loves coming up with these ridiculously bad trade scenarios but the mandate is to win. It doesn't matter what you want or I want, it matters what ownership wants and there is zero chance in hell they would be on board with something like this.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2023, 12:23 PM   #15551
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
What franchise centre??? There is absolutely no guarantee a player taken at 3 is going to be a franchise centre. The NHL draft history is full of 3rd overall picks that never become impact players let alone franchise players. So you want to trade a Selke contending #1 C plus our best forward prospect whom plays a position we need youth in and is showing really well against men at the World's for a magic bean?? That is fn insanity.
Leo Carlsson projects as a 1oa in most years. Only reason he is 3rd is because of how strong bedard and fanitilli are.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:25 PM   #15552
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
What franchise centre??? There is absolutely no guarantee a player taken at 3 is going to be a franchise centre. The NHL draft history is full of 3rd overall picks that never become impact players let alone franchise players. So you want to trade a Selke contending #1 C plus our best forward prospect whom plays a position we need youth in and is showing really well against men at the World's for a magic bean?? That is fn insanity. The good news is Conroy is not remotely that stupid.
You’re also missing his age and compensation in that conversation. I don’t think including Coronoto would be the way but if they’re looking for B-prospect, I’d take that magic bean any day of the week. The flames should not be signing Lindholm long term. Age and cap flexibility are needed for this team. Getting huge value like that, would be amazing. Parting with both would be a tough sell for a team needing young talent, but parting with Lindholm and a B prospect is an easy decision.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:30 PM   #15553
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFG#1 View Post
Technically that would be tampering, as they can not talk extensions with players until they are in the final year of the Contract, which is July 1st. Now it obviously happens all the time, and the NHL doesn't say much about it, however, it is slightly different if you make a trade with Columbus on the basis that a deal is in placed and will be signed July 1st.

I actually think the NHL would penalize that kind of deal, especially if word got out, and it may not if all goes well, but if you decide to trade him to someone else, or Lindholm decides not to sign that extension it is likely you get ratted out.

So IMO if the Flames want to trade Lindholm to CBJ for 3rd overall at the draft it is on the basis of he has 1 year left until UFA. Or wait until July 1 sign Lindholm and then trade him for the Player Columbus picked.
Lindholm can negotiate with the Flames at any time, I don't think you can get charged with tampering with your own players. Either way the Flames would let Lindholm's agent talk to the Blue Jackets and the trade would be done with that understanding. If Lindholm wants to test free agency then the discussions go nowhere anyways.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:33 PM   #15554
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Jesus, that is even worse. It boggles my mind how much people overrate draft picks. Go do some research on how many first rnd draft picks make an impact in the NHL compared to what their projection is. Many don't even make the show. I get the rebuild crowd loves coming up with these ridiculously bad trade scenarios but the mandate is to win. It doesn't matter what you want or I want, it matters what ownership wants and there is zero chance in hell they would be on board with something like this.
If Lindholm doesn't want to re-sign then there can't really be a mandate to win. They aren't going to get a center anywhere close to him back in a trade. Hanifin and Lindholm would probably get late 1sts and prospects at the deadline. Getting the 3rd overall would be way better and probably the best chance to compete in the short term. Columbus still doesn't do it though. If Lindholm goes there it will be for Sillinger + the Kings 1st.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:33 PM   #15555
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Yea Carlsson is gonna be a good one me thinks; how about - with extensions signed and in place for Hanifin and Lindy along with Vladar and his 1 year left - 3rd OA, 22 OA and Sillinger?

Probs get roasted but I could see that work for both sides.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Heavy Jack For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2023, 12:34 PM   #15556
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

I mean if Lindholm still wants out the 3rd overall pick is probably the best return you can hope for. You are getting a ELC top line player in a few years. Its something this organization needs and lacks.

We never capitalized on Matthews ELC when he had his big season.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2023, 12:37 PM   #15557
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
If Lindholm doesn't want to re-sign then there can't really be a mandate to win. They aren't going to get a center anywhere close to him back in a trade. Hanifin and Lindholm would probably get late 1sts and prospects at the deadline. Getting 3rd overall would be way better. Columbus still doesn't do it. If Lindholm goes there it will be for Sillinger + the Kings 1st.
Yes there can. You trade Lindholm for an asset that helps now, even if you have to add to get it. You don't have to move Lindholm for a draft pick and if they did I would bet dollars to doughnuts they are flipping that pick or their own or some kind of package for a #1 C. Again, it doesn't matter if you think the Flames should move away from the mandate to win now, that is the ownership's call and they have called it.

Last edited by dissentowner; 05-26-2023 at 12:39 PM. Reason: Spelling
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:39 PM   #15558
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Yea Carlsson is gonna be a good one me thinks; how about - with extensions signed and in place for Hanifin and Lindy along with Vladar and his 1 year left - 3rd OA, 22 OA and Sillinger?

Probs get roasted but I could see that work for both sides.
I would personally love this, I think the Flames would turn around and deal 16 or 22 or both to help replace Lindholm.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:41 PM   #15559
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Yes there can. You trade Lindholm for an asset that helps now, even if you have to add to get it. You don't have to move Lindholm for a draft pick and if they did I would bet dollars to doughnuts they are flipping that puck or their own or some kind of package for a #1 C. Again, it doesn't matter if you think the Flames should move away from the mandate to win now, that is the ownership's call and they have called it.
I get it but the only comparable center would be PLD and I doubt he wants to sign here. What center is available that could replace Lindholm if he says he wants out. The last time the Flames rebuilt was when they were forced to after the Iggy era. If the UFAs they have expiring over the next two years all want out then they will be forced into a rebuild like before. Different story if Lindholm wants to re-sign.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2023, 12:42 PM   #15560
sss1
Backup Goalie
 
sss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Screw it, shoot for the moon.

Lindholm, Hanifin, Vladar for 2023 3OA, 22OA and Jake F'N Bean. Bring Bean home!
I like it, but I still don't think this would be enough to make Columbus pull the trigger because it doesn't make them win right now.

If CBJ suffered an entire year for a 'deepest draft' top pick, they will certainly want players in return that would make them, at the very least, win their division and contend for in the East. Lindholm/Hanafin/Vladar aren't those guys; they will make them competitive but not by that much.

Still going to dream about it though..
sss1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy