Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-31-2022, 11:13 PM   #1
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Flames 3 Canucks 2

Flames 3 Canucks 2

- Flames score three but let Vancouver back into it
- Blake Coleman has himself a night
- Flames PK blanks Vancouver four times and scores a shortie

Happy New Year's CP!
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 05:16 AM   #2
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

It's a 3.28-1.69 league.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 08:17 AM   #3
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

"but let Vancouver back into it"...

I don't agree with that statement - the Nucks were very fortunate on their goals, and the Flames continued to press throughout the 3rd and were very unfortunate not to blow it open.

Also, he lack of calls on the Canucks on those two semi-breakaways in the 3rd - presumably because they were trailing - was atrocious

Sure, it ended 3-2, but that flatters the Nucks, and the Flames were full marks for the W
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 08:21 AM   #4
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

The Flames were clearly the better team

The lack of scoring touch is a concern though. This game should not have been close, it’s only because the Flames can’t finish. Every ####ing goalie is an all star against them. For god sake, even Grubauer who is toasted.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 08:28 AM   #5
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
The Flames were clearly the better team

The lack of scoring touch is a concern though. This game should not have been close, it’s only because the Flames can’t finish. Every ####ing goalie is an all star against them. For god sake, even Grubauer who is toasted.
There was no lack of finish on Coleman's chance, you just have to give Grubauer credit. And yet another post on what should have been a goal.

And there was a clear stick to the hands on Coleman's(?) semi-breakaway, which was just one of a few infractions that should have resulted in some PPs.

There have been times this year when lack of finish was a problem, but last night wasn't one of them and I think they are coming out of that funk too.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 08:41 AM   #6
GS Skier
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Exp:
Default

Didn't want to start a new thread however looking at Capfriendly and I see Kjillinton on IR and the Flames with 2.6 million in open cap space today. Did that happen earlier?
GS Skier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GS Skier For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 09:08 AM   #7
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
There was no lack of finish on Coleman's chance, you just have to give Grubauer credit. And yet another post on what should have been a goal.

And there was a clear stick to the hands on Coleman's(?) semi-breakaway, which was just one of a few infractions that should have resulted in some PPs.

There have been times this year when lack of finish was a problem, but last night wasn't one of them and I think they are coming out of that funk too.
I was speaking in general not last night only

Yeah, hopefully they come out of it or it even out
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 10:03 AM   #8
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
"but let Vancouver back into it"...

I don't agree with that statement - the Nucks were very fortunate on their goals, and the Flames continued to press throughout the 3rd and were very unfortunate not to blow it open.

Also, he lack of calls on the Canucks on those two semi-breakaways in the 3rd - presumably because they were trailing - was atrocious

Sure, it ended 3-2, but that flatters the Nucks, and the Flames were full marks for the W
Yeah I mentioned both in the game story (pushing in the third, and the missed calls).

Really good sign that they didn't get rattled.

I thought both Vancouver goals were very fortunate.

Given what we've seen called nightly, it's shocking neither of those Coleman calls were made.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 10:04 AM   #9
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Didn’t see much of the game except for last 15 minutes. Maybe I had a few too many spirits but I thought Fames looked extremely spirited in preserving that lead. Urgency, desperation, timely saves.

It was just Vancouver but I liked that. Can’t wait to see that same type of game against some good teams, as you sense they are building confidence.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 10:52 AM   #10
SaskyFlamesFan
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GS Skier View Post
Didn't want to start a new thread however looking at Capfriendly and I see Kjillinton on IR and the Flames with 2.6 million in open cap space today. Did that happen earlier?
I think he has been on IR all year. You don’t get relief until he is on LTIR. The 2+ mil is an accumulation of their daily cap space. Come the deadline they could have as much space to add approx 6 mil of cap hits
SaskyFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 10:56 AM   #11
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GS Skier View Post
Didn't want to start a new thread however looking at Capfriendly and I see Kjillinton on IR and the Flames with 2.6 million in open cap space today. Did that happen earlier?
He's been on IR (not LTIR) all year. That cap-space you see is just the cap-space we have with Kylington counting against the cap.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 11:19 AM   #12
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
There was no lack of finish on Coleman's chance, you just have to give Grubauer credit. And yet another post on what should have been a goal.

And there was a clear stick to the hands on Coleman's(?) semi-breakaway, which was just one of a few infractions that should have resulted in some PPs.

There have been times this year when lack of finish was a problem, but last night wasn't one of them and I think they are coming out of that funk too.
Flames are starting to generate better chances.

Still lagging a touch in HD (15th), but have their expected goals / 60 up to 7th overall now. You don't do that with shots from the red line.

Top 5 in expected goal splits, top 10 in scoring chance splits ... starting to come together.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 12:37 PM   #13
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Flames are starting to generate better chances.

Still lagging a touch in HD (15th), but have their expected goals / 60 up to 7th overall now. You don't do that with shots from the red line.

Top 5 in expected goal splits, top 10 in scoring chance splits ... starting to come together.
You do a good job with providing a deeper dive into the game. Do the HDC include slot chances? Or it's that a separate breakdown?
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2023, 01:16 PM   #14
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
You do a good job with providing a deeper dive into the game. Do the HDC include slot chances? Or it's that a separate breakdown?
Both Scoring Chances (ranked 10th) and High Danger Chances (15th) are home plate shots.

The difference between the two is what happens before the shot.

If there is a pass, rebound or deflection it moves to high danger (goalie has to move). If there isn't it's just a shot from that area.

So teams with high scoring chance totals have shot volume from dangerous areas, but lack the skill? to make it high danger as often as other teams.

I think that describes the Flames pretty well.

The best teams in all situations generate 14 high danger chances per game, the worst 9 ... so it's not a huge chasm. The Flames are at 12 ... so we're talking about 2 per game vs the elite.

Digging a little deeper, the Flames had a great start to the season averaging 13.1 per game in October, hit a wall in November, but bounced back to 13.1 for December.

Same with scoring chances per game ... 32.4 in Oct, 27 in Nov, 32.0 in December.

They seem to be back on track.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 01:36 PM   #15
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Also interesting ...

21/22 Flames all situations ... 12.3 HD60
22/23 Flames all situations ... 12.0 HD60

Generating about the same, not finishing to the same degree ... kind of natural with losing your two best players.

But any notion that Sutter is coaching differently this season is evaporating as the team gets on the same page.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 01:42 PM   #16
flames_fan_down_under
I believe in the Jays.
 
flames_fan_down_under's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitsilano
Exp:
Default

Nice breakdown thanks. Makes me optimistic for the rest of the season. They will be a pain in the ass for opposition, and likely end up on the right side of the score more often than not. Markstrom looking comfortable in net is a massive plus.
flames_fan_down_under is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to flames_fan_down_under For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 01:52 PM   #17
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

In my eyes, the Flames have been playing noticably better starting with the game against the Blues.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2023, 02:11 PM   #18
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

This Flames team is really going to have to play a full 60 minutes to get results. They just don’t have the skill IMO to turn it on and off.

Pretty sure that’s what this coach preaches. I wouldn’t expect a bunch of comfortable wins and you’re going to have games like the last one against the Oilers where you deserve better. But there is definitely enough talent on the team that if they commit to attention to detail in their own zone, they can win. I don’t think guys like Huberdeau and Weegar have been asked to play like that before.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2023, 01:17 AM   #19
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
In my eyes, the Flames have been playing noticably better starting with the game against the Blues.
That game was rock bottom
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy