Alberta Politics & Government Thread 3.0

[Muta]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

So if you were in that situation and had a choice between vaxxed or unvaxxed blood you would tell them to grab the first bag? Or would you choose the vaxxed blood first and unvaxxed second?

Vaxxed blood. Free protection right away. Plus, blood is life, so whatever is first!

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

So if you were in that situation and had a choice between vaxxed or unvaxxed blood you would tell them to grab the first bag? Or would you choose the vaxxed blood first and unvaxxed second?

Is this a serious question? Like, really? Why would it matter? Grab the first ####ing bag and start pumping!

[DFO]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

So if you were in that situation and had a choice between vaxxed or unvaxxed blood you would tell them to grab the first bag? Or would you choose the vaxxed blood first and unvaxxed second?

You take the first bag up. Because it DOES NOT MATTER!

[TheIronMaiden]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

So if you were in that situation and had a choice between vaxxed or unvaxxed blood you would tell them to grab the first bag? Or would you choose the vaxxed blood first and unvaxxed second?

Grab the first ####ing bag. No ####. What harm could unvaxxed blood do? that's not how it works.

[opendoor]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

So if you were in that situation and had a choice between vaxxed or unvaxxed blood you would tell them to grab the first bag? Or would you choose the vaxxed blood first and unvaxxed second?

Who gives a ****? As long as the blood is properly screened and the right type, that's all anyone should be concerned with.

[Ozy_Flame]

Nosferatu wasn't picky, and he knows a thing or two about blood.

[Muta]

Dying in the desert, your f'ing parched and lying on the ground, someone comes along and offers you a bottle of water, but they want to know if you want filtered or unfiltered first...

... WHO THE F CARES, JUST GIMME THE WATER

[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

So if you were in that situation and had a choice between vaxxed or unvaxxed blood you would tell them to grab the first bag? Or would you choose the vaxxed blood first and unvaxxed second?

Originally Posted by Muta

Vaxxed blood. Free protection right away. Plus, blood is life, so whatever is first!

Originally Posted by Fuzz

Is this a serious question? Like, really? Why would it matter? Grab the first ####ing bag and start pumping!

Originally Posted by DFO

You take the first bag up. Because it DOES NOT MATTER!

Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden

Grab the first ####ing bag. No ####. What harm could unvaxxed blood do? that's not how it works.

Originally Posted by opendoor

Who gives a ****? As long as the blood is properly screened and the right type, that's all anyone should be concerned with.

You guys are all wrong.
The correct answer is that if given the choice you 100% take the unvaccinated blood.
Because you care?
No.
Because then there will be less unvaccinated blood for the dumb dumbs who actually do care.

Time to own the covidiots!

[Ozy_Flame]

The hell

[TheIronMaiden]

It amazes me how entitled people are about healthcare.

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

I don't see a response to the "why not" part? We can get our own police force, ignore federal gun laws, have our own pension plan, what exactly is preventing her from setting up our own blood services? Healthcare, after all, is a provincial responsibility.

I guess she could opt out of the Canadian Blood Services agreement, that would be something.

[Looch City]

Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden

It amazes me how entitled people are about healthcare.

Do your OWN research before listening to the MSM “doctors” bro. Don’t you know??

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by GirlySports

I guess she could opt out of the Canadian Blood Services agreement, that would be something.

I don't think it is a stretch at all, coming from the person who said this:

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Tuesday that she will amend the Alberta Human Rights Act to add vaccination status as a grounds subject to protection from discrimination, calling individuals who chose not to get vaccinated against COVID in the past year 'the most discriminated-against group that I've ever witnessed in my lifetime.'

[14Roman14]

This is good that most would not care. I also would not.It just seems odd to me that for so long so many were intolerant of even being in the same restaurant as someone who had made different medical decisions as them but would have no problem accepting their bodily fluids. Maybe we are getting back to being accepting of all again.

[powderjunkie]

I'd demand some latin blood. My temperament is far too calm...I wanna live a little and gesticulate more!

[powderjunkie]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

This is good that most would not care. I also would not.It just seems odd to me that for so long so many were intolerant of even being in the same restaurant as someone who had made different medical decisions as them but would have no problem accepting their bodily fluids. Maybe we are getting back to being accepting of all again.

No. Both are just sensible risk management decisions.

[Sliver]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

This is good that most would not care. I also would not.It just seems odd to me that for so long so many were intolerant of even being in the same restaurant as someone who had made different medical decisions as them but would have no problem accepting their bodily fluids. Maybe we are getting back to being accepting of all again.

There was a period during the pandemic where that 'different medical decision' was putting lives, livelihoods and our healthcare system at risk.

[MarchHare]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

This is good that most would not care. I also would not.It just seems odd to me that for so long so many were intolerant of even being in the same restaurant as someone who had made different medical decisions as them but would have no problem accepting their bodily fluids. Maybe we are getting back to being accepting of all again.

Tell me you don't understand anything about medical science without telling me you don't understand anything about medical science.

[Knut]

You can make an argument that the restrictions on unvaccinated people lasted too long, but there was a time where the restrictions were completely necessary. Those restrictions likely saved thousands of lives in Alberta.

The biggest problem here is that most people I know, Vaccinated or Unvaccinated, had moved past these conversations and are getting back to living a normal life. This has just thrown a grenade back into the division.

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

This is good that most would not care. I also would not.It just seems odd to me that for so long so many were intolerant of even being in the same restaurant as someone who had made different medical decisions as them but would have no problem accepting their bodily fluids. Maybe we are getting back to being accepting of all again.

The situation was different before. It's still dumb and damaging to society as a whole to not get vaccinated, as you have a greater risk for severe disease, which can lead to needlessly depleting our incredibly stressed healthcare system.

I think what you are reading in this thread is that reasonable people who understand science can change positions as the situation and science changes. Unreasonable ones want to change the Alberta Human Rights act to coddle those who have been brainwashed.