Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2022, 09:58 AM   #21
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD View Post
For me, the cap space is exactly the reason I didn’t want to sign anyone else, not just Evan specifically. $1-2 million in cap space at the start of the season Is going to become $3-6million player at the deadline, which to me will be much more valuable than signing a 1-2 million player now for the whole season.

This team is good enough to challenge for the division as it stands right now. I’d rather use a larger amount of space at the deadline than fill the role now personally.
Maybe. But by the deadline there are more teams willing to take on dead cap because their seasons didn't pan out - right now it's basically just Arizona.

And I think right now you're getting that 3-4 million dollar player for 2 million. Pre-covid, Rodrigues probably gets a Matt Belesky type of deal out of someone (and of course at that price or anything like it, I would balk). Bargain bin shopping at the end of free agency has become one of the best uses of cap space during this post-Covid-cap-crunch period. You can get really efficient, short term deals if you just wait and clean up the scraps, even waiting for PTOs. Zach Aston Reese should cost someone $2.5-3 million for multiple seasons, and he might sign for something around 1. Kessel is going to score 50 points or something and cost no money. Then there's the added benefit of having that player in the lineup right from camp (which I hope we're about to see the benefit of re: Tyler Toffoli).

I understand where you're coming from, but personally I'd rather spend the money now, if you can get one of the half dozen or so bargain guys out there.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 09-12-2022, 10:11 AM   #22
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

I assume flames need cap space so they can trade a defenseman for a quality roster player before the season starts.

They just don't know which defenseman they want to trade yet lol.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 10:15 AM   #23
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
I assume flames need cap space so they can trade a defenseman for a quality roster player before the season starts.



They just don't know which defenseman they want to trade yet lol.
I continue to believe that the Flames are not trading a defenseman.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 10:40 AM   #24
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD View Post
For me, the cap space is exactly the reason I didn’t want to sign anyone else, not just Evan specifically. $1-2 million in cap space at the start of the season Is going to become $3-6million player at the deadline, which to me will be much more valuable than signing a 1-2 million player now for the whole season.

This team is good enough to challenge for the division as it stands right now. I’d rather use a larger amount of space at the deadline than fill the role now personally.
This is where I am at too. There is an opportunity cost to consider if we completely cap out early.

First, I think there is a really good chance that Rodrigues will be a one-hit wonder given his age and previous production before last season. The pros of waiting to see if there is a better opportunity during the season intrigue me more than adding a player right now that I think would be largely inconsequential. If it was a really good player with fewer question marks, fine, spend it all now. I just don't think Rodrigues is the guy.

Second, there could be holes that appear during the season due to injury or other players not performing up to snuff. There have been several times over the years where players become available during the season and the Flames have been handcuffed by the cap so couldn't take advantage. The extra couple of million now could easily be the difference in being able to make bigger improvements later or just having some flexibility.

Right now, it reminds me of the old Wheel of Fortune when contestants would have to spend their money on items in a showcase. They'd be down to their last few hundred dollars and would have to buy things like ceramic cats. Rodrigues is a ceramic cat. Take the gift certificate and get something you really want in the future. Don't just take the ceramic cat because it is there.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 09-12-2022, 10:45 AM   #25
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Glad this shook out like it did. The Flames will be able to find a much better player in a mid-season trade than Rodrigues actually is.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:00 AM   #26
Jore
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Good signing for player and team
Jore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:08 AM   #27
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

They could have had plenty of space for Rodrigues if they didnt foolishly give a sub-replacement level player in Rooney 1+ mill.

That signing was absolutely stupid.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Wastedyouth For This Useful Post:
Old 09-12-2022, 11:10 AM   #28
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
They could have had plenty of space for Rodrigues if they didnt foolishly give a sub-replacement level player in Rooney 1+ mill.

That signing was absolutely stupid.
Disagree, he is going to end up being an important piece for us and will end up good value.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:11 AM   #29
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
I assume flames need cap space so they can trade a defenseman for a quality roster player before the season starts.

They just don't know which defenseman they want to trade yet lol.
I think the issue is the Dmen they are selling (Valimaki, Mackey) just aren’t valuable enough to other teams to trade a good forward for.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:16 AM   #30
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Glad this shook out like it did. The Flames will be able to find a much better player in a mid-season trade than Rodrigues actually is.
Yeah but it won’t be free
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:19 AM   #31
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
I think the issue is the Dmen they are selling (Valimaki, Mackey) just aren’t valuable enough to other teams to trade a good forward for.
Those 2 won’t get anything better than the prospects they already have, Pelletier and Ruzicka
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:20 AM   #32
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Disagree, he is going to end up being an important piece for us and will end up good value.
Sutter is going to overuse him for sure
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 11:50 AM   #33
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
I assume flames need cap space so they can trade a defenseman for a quality roster player before the season starts.

They just don't know which defenseman they want to trade yet lol.

Treliving is on record saying the defense was an area they wanted to address and improve. I really doubt they are looking at trading any of the top 6
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 12:03 PM   #34
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Damn that's the 2nd top 6 right shot RW to sign a one year deal with an AAV that would fit the Flames cap perfectly.

Too bad. Would have really improved the depth up front without giving any assets up or committing long term.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 12:49 PM   #35
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
Just say no to these guys with the baseball names.
What, pray tell are “baseball names”.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 01:33 PM   #36
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
Treliving is on record saying the defense was an area they wanted to address and improve. I really doubt they are looking at trading any of the top 6
I think this too. Who's in their top-6?
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 01:36 PM   #37
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Juan Carlos Rodregues Sanchez Sandoval
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 01:38 PM   #38
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
I continue to believe that the Flames are not trading a defenseman.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
Depends, right? What if Valimaki impresses in camp. Then you have a real problem, because probability he gets claimed in waivers increases. And then if you're the flames, you have to go through the excersice of who is better:

1) Kylington + probability of unclaimed Valimaki

2) Kylington + return for Valimaki

3) Valimaki + return for Kylington

If the probability of Valimaki being claimed is 50%+, I think the flames will take Option 2 or Option 3.

If someone offers a young, top-6 forward for Kylington and Valimaki looks great in camp, then why wouldn't the flames go that route?
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 01:45 PM   #39
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

I'm not holding my breath for Valimaki to recover the mobility that he lost due to major injuries.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2022, 02:07 PM   #40
camm13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Damn that's the 2nd top 6 right shot RW to sign a one year deal with an AAV that would fit the Flames cap perfectly.

Too bad. Would have really improved the depth up front without giving any assets up or committing long term.

Except not, cause Ruzika still needs to be signed and at least one more depth forward.
camm13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy