Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2022, 06:32 PM   #1141
FacePaint
Powerplay Quarterback
 
FacePaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Well the latest that catches my eye is the fertilizer emissions issue. I mean we're literally talking about food production here...it's kind of important to humans. I can't say whether these kinds of things are sheer incompetence or malice, but it really doesn't matter.
What exactly do you hate about this voluntary initiative?
__________________
FacePaint is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FacePaint For This Useful Post:
Old 08-29-2022, 06:39 PM   #1142
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Well at this point it's basically information gathering for the purpose of formulating a strategy. I suppose that's voluntary, but we all know that legislation is what follows.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 06:50 PM   #1143
cal_guy
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo View Post
Bill C-69, replacing Bill C-38 added significant time and uncertainty to pipeline project approvals.

Example of the additional rigor required is an assessment on the climate impact of the project. At the surface, this sounds great (hence the support it will get from the general public our east).
In reality, it's an extremely subjective assessment that takes time, and being subjective, is open to repeated follow-up requests that also take months at a time. Subjective being, it depends what source the fuel is coming from, and what it's used for. If a natural gas line is being used to offset coal in Asia, it could benefit the environment. But this can't be proven.
The climate assessment is upstream only which greatly simplifies the work the proponent has to.
cal_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 09:30 PM   #1144
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Well the latest that catches my eye is the fertilizer emissions issue. I mean we're literally talking about food production here...it's kind of important to humans. I can't say whether these kinds of things are sheer incompetence or malice, but it really doesn't matter.

I’ll buy arrogance - that they think they are doing the right thing and know better - and callousness - “some of you will suffer but it’s a price I’m willing to pay”

Does anyone seriously believe they make these policies maliciously? “How are we going to screw Alberta today, I know, let’s go after fertilizer!”
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 09:43 PM   #1145
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch View Post
I’ll buy arrogance - that they think they are doing the right thing and know better - and callousness - “some of you will suffer but it’s a price I’m willing to pay”

Does anyone seriously believe they make these policies maliciously? “How are we going to screw Alberta today, I know, let’s go after fertilizer!”
Yeah, that's a good point and I can't say I'd believe it was malice either. Arrogance makes sense and the argument you make there is basically exactly what I'd expect them to say.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 09:59 PM   #1146
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

The fertilizer stuff is interesting as their are real opportunities to reduce cost and improve yields through the latest farming practices. There are a wide variety of adoption levels of science based farming. Some regulation created by local organizations likely has benefits. What if you made farming a self regulated profession like doctors lawyers or engineers and part of their responsibilities were continuous improvement and implementation of best practices.

I suspect the best farmers right now have minimal changes to make whereas the ones who you have to drag to handle chemical properly have a long way to go. Like any profession there is a wide variety of skill level.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 10:53 PM   #1147
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
The fertilizer stuff is interesting as their are real opportunities to reduce cost and improve yields through the latest farming practices. There are a wide variety of adoption levels of science based farming. Some regulation created by local organizations likely has benefits. What if you made farming a self regulated profession like doctors lawyers or engineers and part of their responsibilities were continuous improvement and implementation of best practices.

I suspect the best farmers right now have minimal changes to make whereas the ones who you have to drag to handle chemical properly have a long way to go. Like any profession there is a wide variety of skill level.
I married into a family of farmers and I can tell you straight up that it very much is like a profession that continually seeks improvement in yields, better crops and cheaper inputs… obviously. Less fertilizer and pesticides is less operating costs and more yields is more revenue so absolutely they do this. It’s actually a very complex business if you sit down and get into the nitty gritty details with a farmer. Maybe not as wide ranging in terms of technical skill as oil and gas but I bet you’d be very surprised at how much and how often these farmers are investigating new adaptations into their craft. How much research and science and discussion and strategy goes into their job and crops and farming. It gets highly technical. Of course it does! Think about it… think about all the #### that can go wrong operating a farm, and how many products and operating expenses you’d have. How much there is to know about, literally everything.

My wife’s cousin is an agronomist. Literally a business degree concentration offered out of U of S that focuses on these sciences and is like a consultant for farmers to optimize results and yields based on the least amount of inputs possible. There’s also, like oil and gas, a very complex futures and pricing / marketing component to the business where farmers have to understand which crop to plant based on meteorological forecasting, prior year harvests / crops, ensuring proper rotation to maximize soil efficacy, where crop pricing for various products will be when harvest and sale arrives, which location to haul your #### to to sell into which market (a good friend of ours one year had to go drive semi trucks all winter over 800kms away to get better pricing), etc etc etc. this was a farmer who also flew to India to learn better practices there and to swap farming strategies and is part of a huge farming board wheee workshops and ideas and best practices are all shared. These are not people that are just your run of the mill country bumpkin morons although I’m sure there are a handful of them. But guess what? In my experience there’s more than a handful of them in oil and gas.

It’s actually quite an insult to say farmers should try to be like other professionals and try to be better, and it’s beyond the point of a joke / usual Trudeau insanity to be pushing this height-of-idiocy fertilizer ban especially at this time with massive global food shortages. You know I actually was just reviewing for my work global food shortages and worldwide pricing on key global staple foods. You should take a gander at the FAO worldwide food index and observe that pricing is climbing quite a bit. With Pakistan flooding and Russia / Ukraine set to keep ongoing, plus gas prices in Europe about to skyrocket (and therefore, fertilizer in Europe will skyrocket…), I don’t anticipate food prices dropping anytime soon.

Sounds like the perfect time to install a fertilizer ban in Canada. Climate change or bust, except for Justin Trudeau, who flies from Kelowna to Vernon.

Last edited by Mr.Coffee; 08-29-2022 at 10:56 PM.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 08-29-2022, 11:13 PM   #1148
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Interesting

https://twitter.com/user/status/1564432756465336320

https://twitter.com/user/status/1564435264139063296
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2022, 11:54 PM   #1149
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Alberta really needs the NDP back in.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 08-30-2022, 04:19 AM   #1150
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

UCP leadership hopeful Danielle Smith's 'climate cops' claim called misinformation, dangerous

Quote:
United Conservative Party leadership candidate Danielle Smith is pushing hard on the idea that Justin Trudeau is hiring “climate cops,” but those claims are being called incorrect and dangerous.

“It’s another conspiracy theory that’s being spread,” said Duane Bratt, a political scientist with Mount Royal University.

On Saturday, Smith put out a tweet based on a job posting from Environment and Climate Change Canada.
Quote:
As for Smith’s interpretation of the posting, Bratt said it is a “different version of reality.”

“It’s a mixture of a whole bunch of lies, but if you’re absolutely convinced that there’s nefarious motives behind the federal government, it doesn’t matter what’s in the job ad,” he said.
Quote:
In Smith’s tweet and in a release she sent out on Monday, she brought up the need for an Alberta sovereignty act.

“We need the Alberta Sovereignty Act to stand up to Trudeau for whatever wild idea he has next,” Smith said in the release.

The act would give Alberta powers to ignore federal laws and court rulings deemed not in the province’s interest.

“That’s separatism. Call it what it is,” Bratt said.

He says stopping the spread of misinformation like this won’t be easy.

“It’s got to come from the top, it’s got to come from responsible leaders. Unfortunately, we’re not dealing with responsible leaders. So it’s up to other Albertans to call this out,” Bratt said.
https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/ucp-leade...rous-1.6047766
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
Old 08-30-2022, 05:31 AM   #1151
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I married into a family of farmers and I can tell you straight up that it very much is like a profession that continually seeks improvement in yields, better crops and cheaper inputs… obviously. Less fertilizer and pesticides is less operating costs and more yields is more revenue so absolutely they do this. It’s actually a very complex business if you sit down and get into the nitty gritty details with a farmer. Maybe not as wide ranging in terms of technical skill as oil and gas but I bet you’d be very surprised at how much and how often these farmers are investigating new adaptations into their craft. How much research and science and discussion and strategy goes into their job and crops and farming. It gets highly technical. Of course it does! Think about it… think about all the #### that can go wrong operating a farm, and how many products and operating expenses you’d have. How much there is to know about, literally everything.

My wife’s cousin is an agronomist. Literally a business degree concentration offered out of U of S that focuses on these sciences and is like a consultant for farmers to optimize results and yields based on the least amount of inputs possible. There’s also, like oil and gas, a very complex futures and pricing / marketing component to the business where farmers have to understand which crop to plant based on meteorological forecasting, prior year harvests / crops, ensuring proper rotation to maximize soil efficacy, where crop pricing for various products will be when harvest and sale arrives, which location to haul your #### to to sell into which market (a good friend of ours one year had to go drive semi trucks all winter over 800kms away to get better pricing), etc etc etc. this was a farmer who also flew to India to learn better practices there and to swap farming strategies and is part of a huge farming board wheee workshops and ideas and best practices are all shared. These are not people that are just your run of the mill country bumpkin morons although I’m sure there are a handful of them. But guess what? In my experience there’s more than a handful of them in oil and gas.

It’s actually quite an insult to say farmers should try to be like other professionals and try to be better, and it’s beyond the point of a joke / usual Trudeau insanity to be pushing this height-of-idiocy fertilizer ban especially at this time with massive global food shortages. You know I actually was just reviewing for my work global food shortages and worldwide pricing on key global staple foods. You should take a gander at the FAO worldwide food index and observe that pricing is climbing quite a bit. With Pakistan flooding and Russia / Ukraine set to keep ongoing, plus gas prices in Europe about to skyrocket (and therefore, fertilizer in Europe will skyrocket…), I don’t anticipate food prices dropping anytime soon.

Sounds like the perfect time to install a fertilizer ban in Canada. Climate change or bust, except for Justin Trudeau, who flies from Kelowna to Vernon.
I’m not sure you understood what I was trying to state in either regards to technology used or self regulated professions. Also if you are calling it a fertilizer ban Im not sure you have read anything beyond the headline. It seems much more similar to something like the regulation of Nox emissions than a ban where the implementation is around best practices and commercially viable options. It will come down to specifics of the legislation though.

Yes there are many farmers that have agronomists working for them and marketing specialists and run farms as corporations and there are many that haven’t adopted these types of practices. Rather than waiting for the market to weed them out or for them to die and pass on farms to the next generations you regulate to move things forward faster. One thing here is that the government should treat these modern farms like any other large corporation and that includes environmental regulation. The question is who should be developing and own the practices and requirements.

You also missed the point about self regulated professions. It was not a comment about professionalism but one about regulation. If the federal government wants to add regulation the best people to develop this regulation would be a body of local farmers. If you created a similar professional act that gave power to farmers to regulate themselves under the guidance of the act then you can have the general requirements contained in legislation but the specific application of what is economic and a best practice determined by the members of the profession and not people external too it. I was discussing a method of regulation that pushes it as local as possible and take politics out of it and not making any comment about professionaism.

And if we are playing the I know farmers for credibility I spent summers working on grandparents farms for many years
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 08-30-2022, 05:17 PM   #1152
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1564725864385744897
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2022, 05:39 PM   #1153
DFO
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Albert
Exp:
Default

So the increase in the price of hydrocarbons was the UCP’s doing? Good to know.
DFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2022, 05:46 PM   #1154
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso View Post
Did we become debt free overnight or something?
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2022, 06:14 PM   #1155
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Didn't he de-index it in 2019? Is he patting himself on the back for this?
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 08-30-2022, 07:58 PM   #1156
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1564779133074276353
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2022, 10:15 PM   #1157
Yikes
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Exp:
Default

So I don't know a thing about the realities/legalities of all of this but is there any way Jason can undo the resignation and "back door" his way to staying in power? The UCP leadership candidates are weak at best, varying levels of crazy and incompetence. I'm not a fan of the current version of whatever the UCP has become but it's pretty clear that out of the current pack of morons up for leader, Jason is a better class of moron.

Last edited by Yikes; 08-30-2022 at 10:22 PM.
Yikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2022, 10:27 PM   #1158
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yikes View Post
So I don't know a thing about the realities/legalities of all of this but is there any way Jason can undo the resignation and "back door" his way to staying in power? The UCP leadership candidates are weak at best, varying levels of crazy and incompetence. I'm not a fan of the current version of whatever the UCP has become but it's pretty clear that out of the current pack of morons up for leader, Jason is a better class of moron.
He is Premier until he loses confidence of the house. So if he refused to leave I’d assume there would be a confidence vote which would be interesting if the NDP voted for or against Kenny or obstained. If he survived the confidence vote then he would remain premier. If he didn’t survive then he could ask the LG for an election bit the LG would like reach out to Parliament to form a new government.

Now if an election was called I suspect that Kenny would not be considered to UCP leader.

He could also call an election before the leadership race is done but that might only defer the issue until the next session of parliament
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2022, 10:58 PM   #1159
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Smith bashing the NDP for not supporting the little guy

https://twitter.com/user/status/1564632270476288005
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2022, 06:39 AM   #1160
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Danielle Smith would have overseen the greatest medical disaster in our history. "catering to small restaurants" would have meant a total collapse of our medical system. But you can't tell her that because she'll "well I don't know about that" and follow with some Libertarian bull####, or even some fake cure we didn't investigate further. She's a simpleton unable to realize the complexities of society.

We were in a #### situation with no good answers, but one clearly very bad one. Yet somehow she gets to stand up there and pretend reality was different.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy