Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2022, 09:05 PM   #261
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
I'm far too drunk for all of your rebuttals, so I concede.
You just about missed out on your natural clowntrick post if it was not Strange-ley broken up.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 09:12 PM   #262
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreal View Post
You just about missed out on your natural clowntrick post if it was not Strange-ley broken up.
By two other posts?
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2022, 04:06 PM   #263
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
No, not comparable. You can't go back the 80's. I mean many teams in the league were playing in 11-13k arenas back then. So the direct comparison would be a team playing in a 14-15k arena while everyone else plays in 18-21k.

The Islanders just finished playing in an 11k (actual viable seats) at Barclay and the revamped Nassau Coliseum (13k). Winnipeg plays in a 15k arena permanently.

Maple Leaf gardens was 12k capacity for perspective.
Ha, some interesting facts and math going on here. I'll deconstruct your argument, even though it's entirely irrelevant to the comparison that was being made, and then I'll wrap back around to the overarching point you glossed over.

First of all nobody in the '80s was playing in "11-13k arenas". In 1980 the smallest capacity arena in the league (other than the Corral) was the Colisée de Québec, which was undergoing renovations. Official capacity that '80-'81 season was 10,012 but for '81-'82 it was expanded to 15,250. Next smallest was the Met Center in the Twin Cities, which was ~14,400. Biggest was Joe Louis Arena in Detroit, at 19,275. Median was Maple Leaf Gardens @ 16,316 seats, and mean (ignoring the Colisée and Corral) was 16,097 (16,359 including the expanded Colisée).

As such your "direct comparison" to today of "a team playing in a 14-15k arena while everyone else plays in 18-21k" is way off-base. The Corral was about 6,500 seats in a league where the average was over 16,000. Not "everyone plays in 18-21k" arenas today either; only about half of teams do. In point of fact the average capacity in the NHL today (ignoring Arizona) is 18,276, and mean is the 18,437-seat Rogers Place in Edmonton. And capacity continues to trend downward, as the average capacities of new arenas opened in the last 20 years (NYI, DET, EDM, VGK, PIT, NJD & WPG) is 17,510. (Little Caesars Arena is far and away the largest of these seven @ 19,515, and Rogers Place and PPG Paints Arena are the only other ones >17,368.)

Restated the way you'd phrased it in the first place, the Flames were "a team playing in a 6.5k arena while everyone else plays in 16-19k".


The overarching point was that the Corral was temporary, was always intended to be temporary, and whether the plan for the Coyotes to play at ASU is 5,000 seats or the 7,350-seat 'league-average-capacity-adjusted' analogue to the Corral, the precise numbers are irrelevant. You wrote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
It was an Arizona special in terms of helping them out that's for sure. Imagine if the Flames said they'd play in the Centrium in Red Deer (7k seats) for 3-5 years while an arena deal is finalized and then built?

You think the league steps in and okays that?
And the answer to that question is a categorical "yes": the League okayed such a scenario in Calgary 40 years ago. The Flames played an entire season in a rinky-dink temporary venue before construction of the Saddledome was approved, and another two seasons before it was built and finished.
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to timun For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2022, 12:47 AM   #264
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timun View Post
And the answer to that question is a categorical "yes": the League okayed such a scenario in Calgary 40 years ago. The Flames played an entire season in a rinky-dink temporary venue before construction of the Saddledome was approved, and another two seasons before it was built and finished.
Not only that, the league authorized a franchise to relocate to Calgary under those conditions. In this case, they're doing it to prevent a franchise from relocating.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2022, 10:12 AM   #265
Playfair
Scoring Winger
 
Playfair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Virtual Seat Map Of Tiny Arena Where Coyotes Will Play Shows It Could Have Serious Potential
https://brobible.com/sports/article/...EqduGW_2DHTsvM
Playfair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2022, 10:37 AM   #266
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

New arena news per Tempe City Council:

-Tempe Staff will report to Council August 18th
-Council would like to have a decision by Halloween and an agreement before the Holidays w/ the Coyotes
-Land remediation to begin early 2023

Source: Me
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jordan! For This Useful Post:
Old 08-23-2022, 04:51 PM   #267
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Just when you thought it couldn't get any better...

https://twitter.com/user/status/1562200232326074370



https://twitter.com/user/status/1562204518770544640
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2022, 10:02 PM   #268
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Came for Mullett reference. Found business taken care of up front. Leaving satisfied
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2022, 10:08 PM   #269
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

$82million salary cap and you have a team playing in a 5,000 seat arena. lol

Just fold them.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 04:12 AM   #270
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
$82million salary cap and you have a team playing in a 5,000 seat arena. lol

Just fold them.
Then who will pay Meruelo the $650 million to buy his franchise back from him? That's the going price, as established by the Kraken.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 08:09 AM   #271
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
$82million salary cap and you have a team playing in a 5,000 seat arena. lol

Just fold them.
For the record, I think it's ridiculous, but the math isn't wildly out of whack. 41 games x 5000 = 205,0000 seats. To make $82,500,000, the average ticket price needs to be $402.44. Obviously over simplistic, but if it was any team other than the Coyotes, one could probably get away with that kind of ticket price for that kind of intimate experience.
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 08:13 AM   #272
Mull
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
For the record, I think it's ridiculous, but the math isn't wildly out of whack. 41 games x 5000 = 205,0000 seats. To make $82,500,000, the average ticket price needs to be $402.44. Obviously over simplistic, but if it was any team other than the Coyotes, one could probably get away with that kind of ticket price for that kind of intimate experience.

+General staff Fees
+Rental Fees
+Travel expenses (unless included in cap calculation already, like players benefits are)
+Other Expenses
+?

-Don't the players pay back a % of their income (or income is withheld so the true player expenses is less - held in escrow)?
-TV contract
-NHL Revenue sharing
-Merchandise and other sales
-?



I don't know why I am posting this other then to highlight your overly simplistic comment- I assume those other income buckets are not just a rounding error but matter. What would the expenses go for $6-9M? How much are the coaches paid? I imagine they are the biggest % of other expenses along with travel

Last edited by Mull; 08-24-2022 at 08:23 AM.
Mull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 08:22 AM   #273
SutterBrother
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
For the record, I think it's ridiculous, but the math isn't wildly out of whack. 41 games x 5000 = 205,0000 seats. To make $82,500,000, the average ticket price needs to be $402.44. Obviously over simplistic, but if it was any team other than the Coyotes, one could probably get away with that kind of ticket price for that kind of intimate experience.
Saving millions on AC with a smaller space though.
SutterBrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SutterBrother For This Useful Post:
Old 08-24-2022, 08:25 AM   #274
Icantwhisper
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I have a feeling going to an NHL game in a 5000 person arena would be awesome, as long a there are at least 4000 people there
__________________
I have Strong opinions about things I know very little about.
Icantwhisper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Icantwhisper For This Useful Post:
Old 08-24-2022, 08:26 AM   #275
Mull
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SutterBrother View Post
Saving millions on AC with a smaller space though.

This is absolutely hilarious that an the building operating expenses of an NHL team are likely meaningful enough that the franchise could feasibly do BETTER in a 5,000 person arena.



I mean that is likely a stretch, but god it makes me laugh when people talk about the Flames relocating.
Mull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 10:20 AM   #276
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Then who will pay Meruelo the $650 million to buy his franchise back from him? That's the going price, as established by the Kraken.
No, it absolutely isn't.

$650M was the [reported*] price to cut the pie into 32 pieces instead of 31.

Meruelo could probably get 3-400M - another $200(ish)M would go to the league as a relocation fee.


*Everyone has a vested interest in presenting high franchise values...I'm sure there is a way to arrive at the $650M number, but I'm skeptical that it is all direct flow of cash from the new owners to the league...

It could be as simple as including unrealized things like revenue sharing/league partnerships that the Kraken do not receive a cut of for the first few years; or I wouldn't be surprised if a new franchise has to prove their financial strength by fronting their first 10 years of revenue sharing contributions - essentially future operational costs that they can roll into the purchase price.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 10:22 AM   #277
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
For the record, I think it's ridiculous, but the math isn't wildly out of whack. 41 games x 5000 = 205,0000 seats. To make $82,500,000, the average ticket price needs to be $402.44. Obviously over simplistic, but if it was any team other than the Coyotes, one could probably get away with that kind of ticket price for that kind of intimate experience.
Also, their payroll is not $82.5 million.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 11:04 AM   #278
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull View Post
+General staff Fees
+Rental Fees
+Travel expenses (unless included in cap calculation already, like players benefits are)
+Other Expenses
+?

-Don't the players pay back a % of their income (or income is withheld so the true player expenses is less - held in escrow)?
-TV contract
-NHL Revenue sharing
-Merchandise and other sales
-?



I don't know why I am posting this other then to highlight your overly simplistic comment- I assume those other income buckets are not just a rounding error but matter. What would the expenses go for $6-9M? How much are the coaches paid? I imagine they are the biggest % of other expenses along with travel
Yup. I didn't do a deep dive. Clearly. Nor, will I. I'm just saying it's hypothetically feasible to make money in a tiny arena.

Imagine the opposite of a stadium experience. Set up a 5000 person arena for a Maple Leafs vs Canadiens game. Or a BoA? How much could you sell those tickets for? The Corral was just over 7000 people. I'm old enough, but unfortunately never got to attend a game there. Must have been glorious. If I get the opportunity to attend a Coyotes game in that venue, I might take it. It's a novelty that will wear off, but will be interesting for a short time.
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 11:33 AM   #279
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

It would be great if this sort of thing became a model that could work. It would be a lot easier for cities to build new arenas if they only had to be 25-30% of the size they currently are.

It does seem like gate driven model of packing 18,000 people into an arena might not be the future for pro-sports in general.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2022, 11:35 AM   #280
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

I can’t wait for these games to be attended by 1000 people a night.

#### the Arizona Coyotes.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy