Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-2022, 05:10 PM   #841
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Please list the Canadian markets that have followed that strategy and won long-term.

Name ANY strategy that a Canadian market has followed that has resulted in winning long term.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2022, 05:11 PM   #842
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
What is most surprising about today's news for me is the lack of actual rumours now. I would have expected some a few local media types from different markets in the NHL to be reporting about offers from their respective markets, or at least rumours of interest. I have seen nothing.


Makes me think that Treliving and Tkachuk are working on a deal. Maybe? Maybe not. Calgary is tight-lipped, but many other organizations aren't.



I guess we will find out soon enough.
Yeah, I find it interesting that there aren't any rumours about him being shopped from any of the major insiders.


I think there is a chance that if there has been an indication that Tkachuk is willing to sign long-term, the Flames want to get it done sooner than later (it could potentially be holding up some UFA negotiations).

We know that Oster is willing to let these things drag out as long as possible to exert maximum pressure on the GM. Matthew's last contract was signed halfway through training camp, and Brady missed Ottawa's first three games last season after signing the day of their first game.

This forces them to get serious and sit down to negotiate if that's what he wants... and lets the Flames work on moving him if it isn't. Either way, it will be settled well over a month before training camp.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2022, 05:14 PM   #843
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danny darko View Post
Has there been any actual indication that he isn't interested in signing long term here? At first it sounded like the arbitration was being viewed as a positive, because it gave them more time to work out a deal. Is all the Tkachuk wants out talk stemming from Eric Francis 's thoughts, or is there more that I haven't seen?
No indication that I can see.

I think it buys time either way. If the Flames want more time to negotiate a contract before he just accepts his QO. It buys them a minimum of 5 days more to keep talks going and avoiding that scenario.

Same thing if the Flames want to trade him. If he accepts his QO, then you are trying to trade a pending UFA player on a 1 year deal as opposed to a player still unsigned, which has a little more value.

I would like to know what happens if Tkachuk was traded after the July 22nd deadline to accept his QO, but before a hearing. Does the team acquiring him inherit the club arbitration, or can he just immediately accept his QO upon being traded? Or does he just stay an RFA as if his QO was just never accepted?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:15 PM   #844
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Almost all of the major insiders are in vacation mode right now. So lack of rumors and speculation from them is not surprising.

Last edited by sureLoss; 07-19-2022 at 05:17 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2022, 05:32 PM   #845
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I hope other GMs think Tkachuk is a top 5 player in the NHL (he isn't) like some media do

This could be a grand slam home run... Tkachuk is going to want the 8 or 9 years...he knows he stock will only go down after last season. He will sign it somewhere this isn't a rental deal IMO.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:33 PM   #846
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Tkachuk is unlikely to put up a better season next year than this year. This is the time for him to decide what to do, as his bargaining power is as good as it could ever be. I don't see him as a victim at all. He's actually been giving a massive opportunity. Career year with Gaudreau. Now the team is desperate to sign him.

If he's still unsure now about whether he wants to commit, what would change in a year?
I agree on his bargaining power.
Perhaps victim isn't the right word, but I'm saying his negotiation is being heavily influenced by what happened with Gaudreau (so beyond his control).

If Gaudreau had signed, no one would be panicking right now that we must sign him right now or trade him right now. That would still be the preference, but there's an extra urgency to his negotiation now that came from external circumstances.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:33 PM   #847
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I fully expect the award to be higher than QO, but not by that much.

However, they could still trade him. He'd be a rental. Same as if they trade him today.
Please don't let accuracy or common sense get in the way of hand wringing, wailing and gnashing of teeth.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:33 PM   #848
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Almost all of the major insiders are in vacation mode right now. So lack of rumors and speculation from them is not surprising.
Vacations!?
Don't they know the dire straights Flames fans are in right now
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:34 PM   #849
Steve Macfarlane
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Exp:
Default

One of the selling points on Gaudreau sticking around was that Tkachuk indicated he's eager to sign with Calgary long-term and do some damage with his linemate.

Did Gaudreau's decision change Tkachuk's mind? Are the Flames really going to lose two 100-point players in the same offseason?

https://calgaryhockeynow.com/calgary...hnny-gaudreau/
Steve Macfarlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:44 PM   #850
flamesrule_kipper34
Franchise Player
 
flamesrule_kipper34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1549519990843445249

Interesting if true, if that's not even the offer then I can see why Tre would want additional time because that was paltry to begin with.
flamesrule_kipper34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:45 PM   #851
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Almost all of the major insiders are in vacation mode right now. So lack of rumors and speculation from them is not surprising.
You'd better not go away on vacation.
MoneyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:46 PM   #852
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
So, despite Gaudreau and Tkachuk both saying the opposite, despite them both negotiating, and despite Gaudreau actually giving a number he'd sign at and then not doing it, you'd have known. Send your resume in.
Put a deadline on it. Gaudreau says he’s staying, there Best be ink drying on paper by the time Gary stepped to the podium.

Especially once a top-2 pick enters the conversation.

Do the best thing for the team.

It’s not a coincidence that the rare times they actually do this, it works out.

Nieuwendyk became Iginla.

Fleury became Regehr.

Hamilton/Fox became Lindholm/Hanifin.

They would’ve bumped Kevin Costner for Treliving at the head of the parade if he’d turned Tkachuk and Gaudreau into Wright ++.

Last edited by GreenLantern2814; 07-19-2022 at 05:48 PM.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:46 PM   #853
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
With all due respect, BS.

"I would have known" is not a plan.
Are you for real? Managers are paid to "know" what is happening in their organizations, especially when it comes to direction and strategy of those interests. Treliving is paid to know what his players are likely to do and make decisions to maintain the long-term viability of the team. Not being able to recognize that there is a huge potential for your best player to walk is a major failing, let alone not understanding that TWO of your best players are prepared to leave at the same time. Again, this isn't like some surprise thing. People on this site, people in our media, people in other teams' media, have been convinced for over two years that Gaudreau was preparing to bolt. How the #### does the General Manager miss something this obvious? It is his job to know and take appropriate measures. He buried his head in the sand and hoped this would all go away if he could just offer enough cash. That was a gross miscalculation. The warning signs were there two years ago and the appropriate response was to be proactive and get something before being left with nothing but your pants around the team's collective ankles. He should have recognized what the player's motivations were, especially when he couldn't get a deal negotiated before the NTC kicked in, but he ignored all the warning signs. This in on the general manager. Plain and simple.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2022, 05:47 PM   #854
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Almost all of the major insiders are in vacation mode right now. So lack of rumors and speculation from them is not surprising.
The world is truly lost if hockey media guys get holidays.

Whats next? The NHL Reporters Union??

Madness!!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:52 PM   #855
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Name ANY strategy that a Canadian market has followed that has resulted in winning long term.
If there isn't one, then it's pretty silly to say one strategy will work and another won't, isn't it?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 05:57 PM   #856
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Are you for real? Managers are paid to "know" what is happening in their organizations, especially when it comes to direction and strategy of those interests. Treliving is paid to know what his players are likely to do and make decisions to maintain the long-term viability of the team. Not being able to recognize that there is a huge potential for your best player to walk is a major failing, let alone not understanding that TWO of your best players are prepared to leave at the same time. Again, this isn't like some surprise thing. People on this site, people in our media, people in other teams' media, have been convinced for over two years that Gaudreau was preparing to bolt. How the #### does the General Manager miss something this obvious? It is his job to know and take appropriate measures. He buried his head in the sand and hoped this would all go away if he could just offer enough cash. That was a gross miscalculation. The warning signs were there two years ago and the appropriate response was to be proactive and get something before being left with nothing but your pants around the team's collective ankles. He should have recognized what the player's motivations were, especially when he couldn't get a deal negotiated before the NTC kicked in, but he ignored all the warning signs. This in on the general manager. Plain and simple.
Why are we still carrying on with the fantasy that Treliving had no idea of the risks of taking either of these guys to the wire with their contract negotiations?

We say the warning signs were there but the actual signs right to the end and the information come out since makes pretty clear Gaudreau made his call at the last minute. And you can even see a pattern, considering he then did the same thing with NJ before signing with Columbus at the last minute.

This is just so over dramatic compared to anything we actually know. I don’t know why making stuff up and painting this entirely bogus picture of Treliving’s incompetence is something worth doing. What do we get out of this?

I get that some of you guys have never even been in proximity to a proper business deal in your life, but risk is sometimes involved. You hope you minimised the risk as much as possible, but as long as the risk is there it remains a completely possible outcome. And, I know it’s a shock, but sometimes you still go after something with big risk because the payoff if it works is that worth it.

The risk didn’t pay off with Gaudreau. It happens. They don’t seem to be willing to take that risk with Tkachuk. Why? Could be a number of reasons.

You can blame Treliving for going for it with what they had if you want, but I think it was the smart play.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2022, 06:01 PM   #857
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesrule_kipper34 View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1549519990843445249



Interesting if true, if that's not even the offer then I can see why Tre would want additional time because that was paltry to begin with.
STLs 1st isn't a lottery pick.

Do not want.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 06:04 PM   #858
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2022, 06:04 PM   #859
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
STLs 1st isn't a lottery pick.

Do not want.
If you're waiting for a lottery pick, then Chucky ain't being traded. What non contending team would trade for 1 year of Matthew Tkatchuk for their 1st round pick?
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
Old 07-19-2022, 06:05 PM   #860
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesrule_kipper34 View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1549519990843445249

Interesting if true, if that's not even the offer then I can see why Tre would want additional time because that was paltry to begin with.
No, it isn’t.

Kyrou: young, RFA, can be sold for a premium.

Krug: top-4 D - someone has to play for us.

1st: obviously.

It’s not far off, but it wouldn’t happen because St Louis weakens themselves and they fancy themselves contenders.

They need Krug and Kyrou. Taking them out and replacing them with Tkachuk is a lateral move at best.

I don’t want any active NHL players part of a trade from St Louis who aren’t pure cap dumps. I want their prospect capital.

Any offer that doesn’t include Zachary Bolduc is a non-starter.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy