Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-14-2022, 09:38 AM   #1821
shutout
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Most likely you see a player like Nyquist from CBJ coming in for a fifth or sixth round pick.
They will put him on the top line left side and see if they have enough depth to be competitive.
If the season goes sideways or he is not enough of an impact player than they can move him at the deadline for more than the acquisition cost.
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
shutout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 09:42 AM   #1822
shutout
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

If you could get a package from the Blues for Tkachuk for Tarasenko, Neighbors, and 2023 first round pick than thats what the Flames should do.

If you bring in Nyquist for a late pick from CBJ and JVR from the Flyers for a late pick than if the team is not highly competitive at the trade deadline you can move out Tarasenko, Nyquist, and JVR at 50% retained along with Toffoli and Tanev and end up with possibly five more first round picks in 2013.

Gives the team a shot at competing for Sutters last year and gives a foundation for a rebuild/retool after the season. Granted they will be top third draft picks, but they all have value.
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska

Last edited by shutout; 07-14-2022 at 09:52 AM.
shutout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 09:45 AM   #1823
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
It would be so Flames though. The 2023 draft is one that could be a big fortune changer for the team as there appears to be a consensus this is the best draft in years. So the Flames will put together a plan where they hope for the best, then begin a forced selloff to leverage the 2024 draft! So Calgary Flames.

I don’t disagree, but unfortunately the Flames have too many good pieces locked up (including Sutter behind the bench) to keep them from being in the bottom half of the league.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 09:47 AM   #1824
Jore
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Icon45

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
I don’t disagree, but unfortunately the Flames have too many good pieces locked up (including Sutter behind the bench) to keep them from being in the bottom half of the league.
If the management showed some foresight and planning for once, they can (including from now!) move those good pieces for good returns and time their build proactively.
Jore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jore For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 09:50 AM   #1825
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shutout View Post
If you could get a package from the Blues for Tkachuk for Tarasenko, Neighbors, and 2013 first round pick than thats what the Flames should do.

If you bring in Nyquist for a late pick from CBJ and JVR from the Flyers for a late pick than if the team is not highly competitive at the trade deadline you can move out Tarasenko, Nyquist, and JVR at 50% retained along with Toffoli and Tanev and end up with possibly five more first round picks in 2013.

Gives the team a shot at competing for Sutters last year and gives a foundation for a rebuild/retool after the season. Granted they will be top third draft picks, but they all have value.
Treliving has already been collecting 2013 first rounders. Might be wise to start looking toward 2023?
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 09:52 AM   #1826
shutout
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Treliving has already been collecting 2013 first rounders. Might be wise to start looking toward 2023?
sorry I was feeling ten years younger this morning
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
shutout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 09:53 AM   #1827
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
I mean, it’s basically the same team they had last season minus Gaudreau and add Kadri.

Not a Stanley cup winner in my opinion, but I wouldn’t call it depressing either
I'd say that team is a step up from last year. Our bottom 6 sucked and that is a significant improvement.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 09:53 AM   #1828
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

No worries man, the typo made me laugh, only because Treliving has loved that 2013 draft class!
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 09:54 AM   #1829
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jore View Post
If the management showed some foresight and planning for once, they can (including from now!) move those good pieces for good returns and time their build proactively.

It’s hard to trade guys at the deadline that have multiple years on their deals though. Teams just don’t have the cap to accommodate.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 10:05 AM   #1830
Jore
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
It’s hard to trade guys at the deadline that have multiple years on their deals though. Teams just don’t have the cap to accommodate.
True, but there are workarounds esp if executed as part of planned rebuilding years - taking bad contracts back, retaining (I realize the org has never done this). Building a championship team is hard, but continuing to make easy choices means continuing to follow the reactive path this org has been on for some time.
Jore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jore For This Useful Post:
bax
Old 07-14-2022, 10:06 AM   #1831
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I see some rumblings Kadri could be returning to the Avs. I think they will need to trade Sam Girard to make the cap work 3.9M left to work with
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 10:07 AM   #1832
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shutout View Post
If you could get a package from the Blues for Tkachuk for Tarasenko, Neighbors, and 2013 first round pick than thats what the Flames should do.

If you bring in Nyquist for a late pick from CBJ and JVR from the Flyers for a late pick than if the team is not highly competitive at the trade deadline you can move out Tarasenko, Nyquist, and JVR at 50% retained along with Toffoli and Tanev and end up with possibly five more first round picks in 2013.

Gives the team a shot at competing for Sutters last year and gives a foundation for a rebuild/retool after the season. Granted they will be top third draft picks, but they all have value.
I’m so sick of hearing this.

Why the hell would we trade Tkachuk for an old winger a late 1st and a middling prospect?
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SeanCharles For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 10:08 AM   #1833
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I see some rumblings Kadri could be returning to the Avs. I think they will need to trade Sam Girard to make the cap work 3.9M left to work with

Would gladly take Girard off their hands
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 10:08 AM   #1834
DinnerDog
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
I’m so sick of hearing this.

Why the hell would we trade Tkachuk for an old winger a late 1st and a middling prospect?
Because it's better than losing him for nothing?
DinnerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DinnerDog For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 10:10 AM   #1835
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
I’m so sick of hearing this.

Why the hell would we trade Tkachuk for an old winger a late 1st and a middling prospect?
Kickstart a rebuild. The top 2 players this team has/had have been linked to going home. Time to build a new core.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to memphusk For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 10:10 AM   #1836
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
Would gladly take Girard off their hands
I feel like so would another 30 teams.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 10:13 AM   #1837
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Who's onboard-


Huberdeau for Tkachuck?
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2022, 10:14 AM   #1838
NegativeSpace
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Exp:
Default

I read some of these posts and don't understand. This team is not finishing last overall or close to that without Gaudreau on the roster. I am curiously optimistic that the Flames could surprise many people without Gaudreau. This year had more to do with Sutter than a star player elevating the rest of the team.



Worse teams just looking at the standings from last year include: Arizona, Buffalo, Chicago, Seattle, Montreal, Anaheim, San Jose, Philadelphia, Seattle ... That is nearly the top ten picks right there. If the Flames were to tank for the 2023 draft they needed to start last year while they were winning the division.



There is also no cap room on most teams available to sell off every player on the roster, unless you think the Flames should take on every bad contract in the league - and why would teams just give away players whose bad contracts expire. They very likely won't be at 111 points or division winner but the same roster is fighting for a division playoff spot or wild card spot at the least, in my opinion.
NegativeSpace is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NegativeSpace For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 10:14 AM   #1839
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe View Post
Who's onboard-


Huberdeau for Tkachuck?
Not Florida
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Wolfman For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2022, 10:16 AM   #1840
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
Not Florida

Well Huberdeau may not sign there or may ask something ridiculous.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy