Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2022, 08:41 AM   #6941
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1546503494256889856

Apparently the ‘latest’ from Friedman according to Nault is the Flames are still at 8x9.5 and not crazy about the ask from Gaudreaus camp being higher than that… this conflicts greatly with the reporting from Seravalli who said the Flames were reportedly prepared to back up the brinks truck. If the flames position is still 8x9.5 this late into the game (I don’t think it is, I think they’ve come up from that) then Gaudreau is as good as gone. Honestly I’m just looking forward to wte the answer is at this point because im tired of the all over the place reporting from all these ‘insiders’.
Heavy Jack is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:43 AM   #6942
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Hard to know what to believe at this point. I really wish Treliving could have moved Lucic at the deadline to free up UFA possibilities if Gaudreau doesn't sign.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:43 AM   #6943
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Sounds like Friedman hasn’t heard anything new

Highly doubt the Flames are sticking to that 8x9.5 number this far into the negotiation, if it’s even true (remember Treliving saying there’s a lot of incorrect speculation right now)
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:44 AM   #6944
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1546503494256889856

Apparently the ‘latest’ from Friedman according to Nault is the Flames are still at 8x9.5 and not crazy about the ask from Gaudreaus camp being higher than that… this conflicts greatly with the reporting from Seravalli who said the Flames were reportedly prepared to back up the brinks truck. If the flames position is still 8x9.5 this late into the game (I don’t think it is, I think they’ve come up from that) then Gaudreau is as good as gone. Honestly I’m just looking forward to wte the answer is at this point because im tired of the all over the place reporting from all these ‘insiders’.
I have a hard time believing that the flames are still at 9.5.

If I had to guess, Gaudreau will be signing at no lower than 10.5 and no higher than 11 for an 8 year deal.

9.5 is just unrealistic.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames1217 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:45 AM   #6945
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1546503494256889856

The Calgary Flames: totally okay with spending $5.25M on a 4th line LW, $6.375M on a centre who can’t play defence, and nearly $6M on their bottom pairing - but refusing to pay elite talent what they deserve.
Or you know...trying to negotiate the best deal possible.

There have been indications from others that the offer is already at $10M now and the sides continue to talk.

They seem more than willing to pay Gaudreau but I do get why they aren't just giving him asking price and are trying to get the best deal possible.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:45 AM   #6946
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

^^^ totally agree, that reporting from Friedman is laughable IMO. If it is true this is why we can’t have anything nice lol.
Heavy Jack is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Heavy Jack For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:47 AM   #6947
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'm not crazy about signing Johnny to a 10+ mill per deal. The whole team makeup changes with a deal like that, I'm not saying he isn't worth it but is it right for the team right now?

Some are going to say that the team is very close and they just need a little more time or something but having a career year on a contract year always kind of scares me. Is this the new norm? Is that line going to always be like this? If they pay their top 2 wingers 10+ will they be able to afford to build a team around them? If something happens and they have to trade him, will his contract be moveable?

To me it's not as simple as "he's our best player so pay him whatever he wants" weather he's worth it or not, I think that's why a deal hasn't been made yet. But that's just me.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:47 AM   #6948
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1546503494256889856

The Calgary Flames: totally okay with spending $5.25M on a 4th line LW, $6.375M on a centre who can’t play defence, and nearly $6M on their bottom pairing - but refusing to pay elite talent what they deserve.
Calgary Flames fans: finding a new thing to lose it about every time an insider tweets.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:48 AM   #6949
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I have not seen this? Where has Jersey admitted that there was a deal for Tkachuk on the table?
The Devils admitted there was a deal on the table for the 2nd pick overall. They never admitted who the deal was for, but the two teams and players connected to the Devils for this pick were Vancouver and TJ Miller and Calgary and Matthew Tkachuk. The buzz the hours before the draft was all related to Tkachuk. You can ignore that if you wish, but that was the word on the street from multiple people at the draft. You know, kind of like the word has been Johnny was going to listen to other offers and consider a move to the east coast. Ignore these things at your peril.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:50 AM   #6950
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Ignore these things at your peril.
There’s actually no risk of peril, I’m just drinking a coffee.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:50 AM   #6951
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Calgary Flames fans: finding a new thing to lose it about every time an insider tweets.
Yeah, how dare we point out salary inefficiencies on a team we love when we can look at recent Stanley Cup champions and see how well they manage the salary cap. Madness I say!

All we have to talk about right now is what the insiders are tweeting.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:52 AM   #6952
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

nah, I don't buy this one bit. I mean, we'd all love to have Johnny at $9.5m, but that's just unrealistic and the Flames know it. No way they are that daft.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:52 AM   #6953
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
If Gaudreau is gone, the exodus will be interesting to watch develop. Tkachuk will not re-sign with the team long-term (I don't think he re-signs long-term regardless of Gaudreau, but that's just a gut feel). Coleman, who came here on Gaudreau's recommendation, will be demanding a trade. Lindholm will see his linemates both go and will likely make it abundantly clear he has no interest in re-upping when his contract ends as he will see the lack of future for this team. Same with Hanifin. With the top players all gone how long will Markstrom want to hang around? Dominoes are there ready to fall. Gaudreau is the most important player to this team and it is critical they get him under contract, otherwise the consequences will be severe and widespread. I think the Flames know this and will pay up to $11M. That would be all the potential savings from Lucic disappearing being dumped into Gaudreau's salary. They just have to sell Gaudreau on Calgary being the best place for his growing family and future children.
I actually think that Tkachuk is more likely to sign a long term deal this summer if Gaudreau is gone. In fact I’m pretty sure he’d want to cash in on the 100 point season, because he won’t be hitting close to the same numbers without Gaudreau. Think about how much money he would lose on a long term contract as a 70pt player compared to a 100!
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:53 AM   #6954
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
The Devils admitted there was a deal on the table for the 2nd pick overall. They never admitted who the deal was for, but the two teams and players connected to the Devils for this pick were Vancouver and TJ Miller and Calgary and Matthew Tkachuk. The buzz the hours before the draft was all related to Tkachuk. You can ignore that if you wish, but that was the word on the street from multiple people at the draft. You know, kind of like the word has been Johnny was going to listen to other offers and consider a move to the east coast. Ignore these things at your peril.

Do you have anything substantial that says Tkachuk to NJ? I just don’t buy that was in the cards. I saw they were in talks with Chicago about Debrincat.

I also don’t think the Devils said there was a deal on the table. They said they had discussions about the pick. It’s anyone’s guess how close those discussions actually got to materializing into anything.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:54 AM   #6955
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I'm not crazy about signing Johnny to a 10+ mill per deal. The whole team makeup changes with a deal like that, I'm not saying he isn't worth it but is it right for the team right now?

Some are going to say that the team is very close and they just need a little more time or something but having a career year on a contract year always kind of scares me. Is this the new norm? Is that line going to always be like this? If they pay their top 2 wingers 10+ will they be able to afford to build a team around them? If something happens and they have to trade him, will his contract be moveable?

To me it's not as simple as "he's our best player so pay him whatever he wants" weather he's worth it or not, I think that's why a deal hasn't been made yet. But that's just me.
The team must consider downstream effects of losing a player like Gaudreau. What is the domino effect? Imagine what would happen in Edmonton if the Oilers lost McDavid or Pittsburgh lost Crosby? The ability to attract and retain players goes down dramatically. I think the Flames have to sign Gaudreau and then have to move Tkachuk for younger cost-controlled players. That should keep the band mostly together.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:54 AM   #6956
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1546503494256889856

The Calgary Flames: totally okay with spending $5.25M on a 4th line LW, $6.375M on a centre who can’t play defence, and nearly $6M on their bottom pairing - but refusing to pay elite talent what they deserve.
I'm having a brain fart. Who is this?
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:55 AM   #6957
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I'm not crazy about signing Johnny to a 10+ mill per deal. The whole team makeup changes with a deal like that, I'm not saying he isn't worth it but is it right for the team right now?

Some are going to say that the team is very close and they just need a little more time or something but having a career year on a contract year always kind of scares me. Is this the new norm? Is that line going to always be like this? If they pay their top 2 wingers 10+ will they be able to afford to build a team around them? If something happens and they have to trade him, will his contract be moveable?

To me it's not as simple as "he's our best player so pay him whatever he wants" weather he's worth it or not, I think that's why a deal hasn't been made yet. But that's just me.
Yeah and the big thing is Tkachuk is likely to come within $500k of whatever Gaudreau signs for (if he wants to stay).

So you need to be prudent with that.

The rumored delta in this thread is Flames are at $10M, and Gaudreau's camp is at $11.5M. Really at this point in negotiations that isn't a very big gap.

But the Flames can't just jump right to $11.5M here - that likely means that Tkachuk want's at least $11M and the Flames have $22.5M tied up in two LWs.

However if they can get Gaudreau for $10.5M, then maybe that means Tkahuk is closer to $10M...and now you have $2M more cap space to work with than you would if you just give Gaudreau exactly what he is asking for.

You will see all the "insiders" talking about Gaudreau's ask, and how he's going to look at what's available on the open market today, because his side will be leaking info to try to put pressure on the Flames.

But in the end both sides have until 10PM tomorrow to work out a deal, and they are going to use all of that time to try and get the best deal possible. This was always going to be the outcome.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:56 AM   #6958
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
The Devils admitted there was a deal on the table for the 2nd pick overall. They never admitted who the deal was for, but the two teams and players connected to the Devils for this pick were Vancouver and TJ Miller and Calgary and Matthew Tkachuk. The buzz the hours before the draft was all related to Tkachuk. You can ignore that if you wish, but that was the word on the street from multiple people at the draft. You know, kind of like the word has been Johnny was going to listen to other offers and consider a move to the east coast. Ignore these things at your peril.
I was just looking for clarification as your original post was confusing.
I'm actually not to fussed about it either way. Just fascinated to see what happens next.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2022, 08:56 AM   #6959
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I'm having a brain fart. Who is this?
It was just me taking a shot at Monahan’s inability to be an effective 200 foot player, and the team not willing to trade him for “50 cents on the dollar” in previous off-seasons.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2022, 08:56 AM   #6960
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I'm having a brain fart. Who is this?
I believe that’s mony’s cap hit
Heavy Jack is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flames , stanley cup , win


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy