07-06-2022, 02:53 PM
|
#5641
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole436
I want to believe no news is good news. If Johnny was determined to hit the FA market, I don't think Treliving would be sitting on his hands like this.
|
What else can he do? FA is not open yet
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 02:54 PM
|
#5642
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
According to several reports on twitter (labrun). They have not replied to the Flames offer. Treliving is trying to meet them this week to clarify.
That’s not holding then I don’t know what is
|
I don't see anything like that on LeBrun's twitter feed.
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 02:55 PM
|
#5643
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
What else can he do? FA is not open yet
|
He would likely trade his rights to one of the teams Johnny has shown interest in.
__________________
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 02:56 PM
|
#5644
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Yeah Eichel is probably the best recent comparison.
Tkachuk the better on ice results and less health uncertainty
But Tkachuk has more question marks with the contract uncertainty.
Really if the Flames shop him they have to allow him to talk contract with the team trading for him for a better return. Similar to Fiala.
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:00 PM
|
#5647
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole436
He would likely trade his rights to one of the teams Johnny has shown interest in.
|
Johnny hasn’t decided one way or the other . That’s why we are here
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:00 PM
|
#5648
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
If Johnny walks, do you think Tkachuk will want to stay long term??? If he wants to win, he'll go somewhere else. If we want him to stay, it'll be a HUGE contract...and do you think he'll be as good without Gaudreau?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:03 PM
|
#5649
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
If Johnny walks, do you think Tkachuk will want to stay long term??? If he wants to win, he'll go somewhere else. If we want him to stay, it'll be a HUGE contract...and do you think he'll be as good without Gaudreau?
|
He ain’t going to be as good without Johnny or another star to help him
He’ll get more money but who knows what he wants to do
Tkachuk will get a big offer in the FA market. Maybe even bigger than Johnny’s
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:08 PM
|
#5650
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
Easily replaceable or somewhat easily replaceable - what’s the difference? Tkachuk is neither of those things.
If you’re worried about how much Tkachuk contributes to his lines dominance there are plenty of metrics that show he contributes a lot.
You’re worried about him getting a big contract? Yeah top players typically earn top dollar - that isn’t a problem. Cap issues arise when you have 5-6 million dollar guys taking up space on the bottom half of your roster.
Bottom line is there no comparable player to Tkachuk available in free agency and heck even if there were what are the odds of Calgary actually landing him? Calgary typically isn’t a top pick for high profile free agents.
If your solution to replacing Tkachuk is signing an older, less productive, and equally as expensive player then you’re not making out ahead.
|
Less productive? Do you honestly believe that Tkachuk is a legit 100 point winger, without Gaudreau pumping him up? In the playoffs he was on pace for 68 points, which is much closer to his typical career production of 70ish points. Tkachuk is fantastic, but how excited are people going to be about him when he's making 10 million/year and only producing 70ish points.
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:13 PM
|
#5651
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
|
Yesterday on Fan960, Ryan Pinder was talking about this topic.
he mentioned, this type of signing likely won't occur until they are in the final hours before free agency (his opinion only)
he used the example of Landeskog, who when he resigned with the Av's it was not done until hours before the deadline
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:20 PM
|
#5652
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Less productive? Do you honestly believe that Tkachuk is a legit 100 point winger, without Gaudreau pumping him up? In the playoffs he was on pace for 68 points, which is much closer to his typical career production of 70ish points. Tkachuk is fantastic, but how excited are people going to be about him when he's making 10 million/year and only producing 70ish points.
|
Which you can also attribute to playing an extremely locked down series against Dallas where scoring was hard to come by for everyone.
He was fine in the Edmonton series and is likely going to fall in between last season and his typical seasons previously, which point to him in the 80-85 point range. It's easy to forget he has had some very productive seasons without Gaudreau and without dedicated #1 PP unit time.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:23 PM
|
#5653
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Teams are welcome to approach about Tkachuk even if Johnny stays.
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:25 PM
|
#5654
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
Which you can also attribute to playing an extremely locked down series against Dallas where scoring was hard to come by for everyone.
He was fine in the Edmonton series and is likely going to fall in between last season and his typical seasons previously, which point to him in the 80-85 point range. It's easy to forget he has had some very productive seasons without Gaudreau and without dedicated #1 PP unit time.
|
Tkachuk also had an injured hand for the majority of the playoffs.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:26 PM
|
#5655
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I don't see anything like that on LeBrun's twitter feed.
|
I've heard something to this effect from Seravelli on various podcasts and radio shows as well. This is scary as a Flames fan because if things outside of money are things Johnny is struggling with (climate, competitiveness, location) then the Flames are not going to win against a lot of teams that may be willing to go to extreme's to try to land him.
This is a very concerning period to be in the dark as a fan and even more so as the GM. You just have to hope Tre doesn't go off the deep end to retain him with a ludacris AAV, or worse, lose him and attempt to spend every dollar on poor FA players to replace him by committee.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:26 PM
|
#5656
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
the decision about Tkachuk, in my mind, is completely isolated from Gaudreaus decision. If you can re-sign Chucky long-term, you do it. If you can't, you simply have to trade him, even if Johnny stays. Can't have yet another "will he, won't he" waiting game next year.
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:26 PM
|
#5657
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Less productive? Do you honestly believe that Tkachuk is a legit 100 point winger, without Gaudreau pumping him up? In the playoffs he was on pace for 68 points, which is much closer to his typical career production of 70ish points. Tkachuk is fantastic, but how excited are people going to be about him when he's making 10 million/year and only producing 70ish points.
|
I would be way happier with a 10 million dollar 24 year old Matthew Tkachuk than I would be with a 9 million dollar 28 year old Filip Forsberg. I would think 99% of fans would be too.
Points don’t even have anything to do with it. Tkachuk boasts elite metrics in all 3 zones. He’s a rare and valuable player.
One player is just entering their prime (and is already better) while the other player is on the verge of exiting their prime.
It’s laughable that you think we can just grab a player from free agency on a whim that is anywhere near the caliber of player Tkachuk is.
The only way the Flames should consider moving him is if he let’s them know he’s accepting his QO and not willing to negotiate a long term deal.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:28 PM
|
#5658
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
The only way the Flames should consider moving him is if he let’s them know he’s accepting his QO and not willing to negotiate a long term deal.
|
I assume that's what most are saying here. Or at least I hope so.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:31 PM
|
#5659
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
I would be way happier with a 10 million dollar 24 year old Matthew Tkachuk than I would be with a 9 million dollar 28 year old Filip Forsberg. I would think 99% of fans would be too.
Points don’t even have anything to do with it. Tkachuk boasts elite metrics in all 3 zones. He’s a rare and valuable player.
One player is just entering their prime (and is already better) while the other player is on the verge of exiting their prime.
It’s laughable that you think we can just grab a player from free agency on a whim that is anywhere near the caliber of player Tkachuk is.
The only way the Flames should consider moving him is if he let’s them know he’s accepting his QO and not willing to negotiate a long term deal.
|
The problem then is not a lot of teams can take on a $9M salary. This limits your return and potential trading partners significantly.
This previous Tkachuk deal was one of Trelivings biggest mistakes as GM. Had he drawn a harder line at a more workable term this current situation would be non-existent or much more manageable.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
07-06-2022, 03:35 PM
|
#5660
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
I would be way happier with a 10 million dollar 24 year old Matthew Tkachuk than I would be with a 9 million dollar 28 year old Filip Forsberg. I would think 99% of fans would be too.
Points don’t even have anything to do with it. Tkachuk boasts elite metrics in all 3 zones. He’s a rare and valuable player.
One player is just entering their prime (and is already better) while the other player is on the verge of exiting their prime.
It’s laughable that you think we can just grab a player from free agency on a whim that is anywhere near the caliber of player Tkachuk is.
The only way the Flames should consider moving him is if he let’s them know he’s accepting his QO and not willing to negotiate a long term deal.
|
I think Tkachuk needs to be signed or traded prior to July 11th. The moment that QO goes to Tkachuk, the game changes because all he has to do is sign it.
Trade him or sign him by Monday.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.
|
|