Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2022, 01:10 AM   #81
AT77
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
28 goals in 52 games last season, 7th in the NHL
and then 14 points in 22 playoff games
12 seasons in his career and only 1 30 goal season, 2 if you count the 28 goals in 52 games two seasons ago now with Montreal and consider it over an 82 game pace. Last season was 20 goals in 74 games split with Montreal and Calgary. You keep mentioning his 28 goals in 52 games every time I talk about Toffoli like he does that every season lol. That was literally one season, and as I mentioned earlier, one 31 goal season...7 years ago lmao. He has a whopping 193 goals in 651 career games, damn what a sniper eh? Ovechkin better watch out, or Toffoli might break Gretzky's record goal record first! That's 24 goals over an 82 games average in his career. How that translates to a "pure goal scorer" that he's been labelled as is beyond me. The only reason I can think of why he's considered that is because he sucks at everything else even more than scoring goals.

I can tell you're one of those homer fans that simply cannot criticize anything the Flames do as negative or wrong, such as the Toffoli trade, and think everything they do is right. He ####ing sucks man, just accept and admit it. Nice try though, I'll give you an A for effort just to keep your spirits and hopes up.
AT77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 01:25 AM   #82
cam_wmh
Franchise Player
 
cam_wmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Have you considered, debating your points with unbridled, gratuitous, hyperbole?



Quote:
Originally Posted by AT77 View Post
12 seasons in his career and only 1 30 goal season, 2 if you count the 28 goals in 52 games two seasons ago now with Montreal and consider it over an 82 game pace. Last season was 20 goals in 74 games split with Montreal and Calgary. You keep mentioning his 28 goals in 52 games every time I talk about Toffoli like he does that every season lol. That was literally one season, and as I mentioned earlier, one 31 goal season...7 years ago lmao. He has a whopping 193 goals in 651 career games, damn what a sniper eh? Ovechkin better watch out, or Toffoli might break Gretzky's record goal record first! That's 24 goals over an 82 games average in his career. How that translates to a "pure goal scorer" that he's been labelled as is beyond me. The only reason I can think of why he's considered that is because he sucks at everything else even more than scoring goals.

I can tell you're one of those homer fans that simply cannot criticize anything the Flames do as negative or wrong, such as the Toffoli trade, and think everything they do is right. He ####ing sucks man, just accept and admit it. Nice try though, I'll give you an A for effort just to keep your spirits and hopes up.



oh good.
cam_wmh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to cam_wmh For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 01:26 AM   #83
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AT77 View Post
12 seasons in his career and only 1 30 goal season, 2 if you count the 28 goals in 52 games two seasons ago now with Montreal and consider it over an 82 game pace. Last season was 20 goals in 74 games split with Montreal and Calgary. You keep mentioning his 28 goals in 52 games every time I talk about Toffoli like he does that every season lol. That was literally one season, and as I mentioned earlier, one 31 goal season...7 years ago lmao. He has a whopping 193 goals in 651 career games, damn what a sniper eh? Ovechkin better watch out, or Toffoli might break Gretzky's record goal record first! That's 24 goals over an 82 games average in his career. How that translates to a "pure goal scorer" that he's been labelled as is beyond me. The only reason I can think of why he's considered that is because he sucks at everything else even more than scoring goals.

I can tell you're one of those homer fans that simply cannot criticize anything the Flames do as negative or wrong, such as the Toffoli trade, and think everything they do is right. He ####ing sucks man, just accept and admit it. Nice try though, I'll give you an A for effort just to keep your spirits and hopes up.
So let me get this straight. Because he's not Ovechkin, he sucks? A player who scored 28 in 52 the last year before being traded, and 193 in his career, is simply useless? And anyone who finds any use in him at all is a blind Flames homer, including the GMs who traded for him previously? Good to know.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 01:38 AM   #84
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AT77 View Post
12 seasons in his career and only 1 30 goal season, 2 if you count the 28 goals in 52 games two seasons ago now with Montreal and consider it over an 82 game pace. Last season was 20 goals in 74 games split with Montreal and Calgary. You keep mentioning his 28 goals in 52 games every time I talk about Toffoli like he does that every season lol. That was literally one season, and as I mentioned earlier, one 31 goal season...7 years ago lmao. He has a whopping 193 goals in 651 career games, damn what a sniper eh? Ovechkin better watch out, or Toffoli might break Gretzky's record goal record first! That's 24 goals over an 82 games average in his career. How that translates to a "pure goal scorer" that he's been labelled as is beyond me. The only reason I can think of why he's considered that is because he sucks at everything else even more than scoring goals.

I can tell you're one of those homer fans that simply cannot criticize anything the Flames do as negative or wrong, such as the Toffoli trade, and think everything they do is right. He ####ing sucks man, just accept and admit it. Nice try though, I'll give you an A for effort just to keep your spirits and hopes up.
I agree with you that he is massively overrated however I would say he is a solid / very good 3rd liner but maybe a middling to iffy 2nd liner. He was incredibly disappointing over his Calgary tenure and anyone arguing the alternative is being disengenuous.

Toffoli’s problem is conditioning and overall laziness (as usual, like most people that get paid big NHL contracts). Toffoli just isn’t interested in putting forth the CONSISTENT work ethic needed over a season. 82 games, Toffoli will come to work about 1/4 of them. Because his talent level is insane, he gets away with it. It’s pretty obvious he’s just one of those guys that won’t compete when you need them to.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 01:39 AM   #85
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
So let me get this straight. Because he's not Ovechkin, he sucks? A player who scored 28 in 52 the last year before being traded, and 193 in his career, is simply useless? And anyone who finds any use in him at all is a blind Flames homer, including the GMs who traded for him previously? Good to know.
He does kinda suck for the acquisition cost.

Sorry, just true. You need more from those picks than the stats you’re trotting out if you wanna win.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 01:45 AM   #86
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
He does kinda suck for the acquisition cost.
That wasn't the argument being made, though, was it? Apparently we're supposed to believe he is no use at all.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 06:25 AM   #87
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I agree with you that he is massively overrated however I would say he is a solid / very good 3rd liner but maybe a middling to iffy 2nd liner. He was incredibly disappointing over his Calgary tenure and anyone arguing the alternative is being disengenuous.

Toffoli’s problem is conditioning and overall laziness (as usual, like most people that get paid big NHL contracts). Toffoli just isn’t interested in putting forth the CONSISTENT work ethic needed over a season. 82 games, Toffoli will come to work about 1/4 of them. Because his talent level is insane, he gets away with it. It’s pretty obvious he’s just one of those guys that won’t compete when you need them to.
Toffoli and Jarnkrok turned out to be massive failure by Treliving. It’s not even debatable. You can argue that he had to make some deals to go for it but that’s about it. Now shut up or you get labeled as being negative. It’s never a Flames fault.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 07:10 AM   #88
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Toffoli and Jarnkrok turned out to be massive failure by Treliving. It’s not even debatable. You can argue that he had to make some deals to go for it but that’s about it. Now shut up or you get labeled as being negative. It’s never a Flames fault.
Labeled as negative?
Surely you must have some level of self awareness to see that you ARE negative

For instance you chose to make the point in this thread that BT gave up must as much for Toffoli which is off-topic, and a poor comparison given one was acquired at the deadline and the other in the off-season.

That's the type of unnecessary negativity you bring to every thread.

So yeah. Wear the label man. It is earned.

Last edited by Jiri Hrdina; 06-30-2022 at 07:27 AM.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 07:22 AM   #89
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Toffoli is a 25G 50pt winger who plays both ends of the ice effectively and costs 4.25 a year.

And people are whining about HIM?

Wut?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 07:28 AM   #90
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Toffoli is a 25G 50pt winger who plays both ends of the ice effectively and costs 4.25 a year.

And people are whining about HIM?

Wut?
It's what people on here do. Most days it's a negativity contest on here.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Burning Beard For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 07:29 AM   #91
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

I can appreciate the disappointment in Toffoli in the last month of the season and playoffs, but he is a Sutter player and was lights out in Montreal the previous season.

Always easy to play hindsight armchair GM.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 07:47 AM   #92
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Toffoli and Jarnkrok turned out to be massive failure by Treliving. It’s not even debatable. You can argue that he had to make some deals to go for it but that’s about it. Now shut up or you get labeled as being negative. It’s never a Flames fault.
I see Toffoli and Jarnkrok as being massive failures by Toffoli and Jarnrock.

There was no logical reason to expect them to play as poor as they did, IMO.

It's on them.
The Cobra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 07:52 AM   #93
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Toffoli generated a ton of chances against Dallas, just didn't finish.
Similarly I thought Jarnkrok was generally good except for the total lack of produciton.

But yeah at some point the GM brings in players and they are the ones that have to perform.

Not everything is the GM's fault.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 08:00 AM   #94
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Why we’re talking about them, I don’t know, but both Toffoli and Jarnkrok were fine, just unlucky. Jarnkrok’s was less noticeable because his game was really great away from the puck and that’s what he was brought in for, while Toffoli was brought in for offense and just didn’t contribute much of it even if the rest of his game was sound.

Criticism of Toffoli is fair, but usually seems hyperbolic. Criticism of Jarnkrok makes no sense to me. Either you didn’t watch any games or your expectations of him were wildly inconsistent with any possible reality.

But you know… something something Fiala.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 08:15 AM   #95
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

If you were to have made a list of quality available players at last year's deadline Toffoli and Jarnkrok would have been near top of list. Flames acquired both. Both sucked. It happens
The alternative was to do nothing, which was not an option.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 08:28 AM   #96
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
If you were to have made a list of quality available players at last year's deadline Toffoli and Jarnkrok would have been near top of list. Flames acquired both. Both sucked. It happens
The alternative was to do nothing, which was not an option.
And Toffolli has 2 years left at 4.25 mil. When free agent frenzy starts and similar players get $6 mil or more we will be ok having Toffolli. Lots of players of his caliber struggling on new teams post trade deadline. Let’s give him next year before we say he sucks
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 08:39 AM   #97
Sidney Crosby's Hat
Franchise Player
 
Sidney Crosby's Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay random View Post
by way of comparison, does anybody have a jfresh card for toffoli? I'd like to have some data other than ‘y'all, he ####ing sucks’.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1493279689103880195
Sidney Crosby's Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sidney Crosby's Hat For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2022, 08:44 AM   #98
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
And Toffolli has 2 years left at 4.25 mil. When free agent frenzy starts and similar players get $6 mil or more we will be ok having Toffolli. Lots of players of his caliber struggling on new teams post trade deadline. Let’s give him next year before we say he sucks
Yeah the saving grace is that his contract is decent for the goal production he can provide. My major beef with the acquisition is that his skating is so bad and this is a team that needs to get faster not slower. Also it seems like they really didn't take a good look at where he was going to fit on their roster as the coach didn't play him top 6 and he's one of those players where you aren't going to get value out of him in a bottom 6 role.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 09:02 AM   #99
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Clear and simple Tofolli has become a cheaper Mangiapane replacement in the top 6.


Mangiapane has been undervalued at each step in his contract dealings with the Flames and is likely looking at getting paid far more to stay in Calgary than the Flames have in their cap if they keep Gaudreau and Tkachuk.

The Flames have played hard ball on contracts with him (first non-elc contract was a 2-way with 70K in minors) In a very similar situation the Flames gave Dube a 3x 2.3 M rather than a $715K/70K slap in the face they gave Mangiapane.

The Flames likely don't want to take a chance with their tight cap letting Mangiapane go to arbitration.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2022, 09:12 AM   #100
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Back on topic. The Athletic has Corey Pronman, Dom Luszczyszyn and Sean Gentille all liking what the trade does for LA.

NHL trade grades: Wild send Kevin Fiala to Kings for first-round pick and a prospect

I found the sub-text of the article setting up that the Pacific might have 4 teams that might be contenders.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy