Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-21-2022, 11:41 PM   #3821
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

I don’t expect John to take any discount. He’s earned a long term contract as a UFA. As long as the Flames are negotiating in the range of what he considers a reasonable “fair market value” I am confident he will re-sign here.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 06:18 AM   #3822
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
No, that was what you said. You said this was different because Landeskog and Stamkos wanted to stay in their markets. You took the approach that Gaudreau doesn't. I mean it is right there for everybody to read man.
I said thost players wanted to stay in their markets yes. So? We really don't know if Johnny wants to stay in Calgary or play closer to home. I'm not exactly sure how you can extrapolate that I inferred Gaudreau is a liar out of that. You need a break man.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2022, 06:32 AM   #3823
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Both of those teams were elite and seen as the top teams in the entire league. Bright futures. Great places to live and play. Calgary has a very questionable future and I doubt the majority of players view Calgary as a top lifestyle city. Doesn't mean Gaudreau won't stay but neither of those are good examples.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 07:26 AM   #3824
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Which elite team has money or wanting to sign Johnny?

Calgary is not a bad place to live. It’s not that big of a difference from Denver.
Unless you prefer US taxes.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 07:32 AM   #3825
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Both of those teams were elite and seen as the top teams in the entire league. Bright futures. Great places to live and play. Calgary has a very questionable future and I doubt the majority of players view Calgary as a top lifestyle city. Doesn't mean Gaudreau won't stay but neither of those are good examples.
When Stamkos signed his contract TB was the opposite of a top team - they missed the POs the season after he signed. Maybe he was prescient But they were still thinking Drouin was a future star.

And of course, when Landeskog signed, the Avs were in a similar position as the Flames. Fresh off a second round exit. And it was clear money was the issue for Landeskog anyway.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 07:45 AM   #3826
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
No that's only you. I certainly hope that if he signs elsewhere you don't sulk and call him a liar. He can love it here and still decides he loves it closer to home more.
Yeah, I don’t know why that particular poster gets so caught up on this issue and always has to bring in the narrative of Johnny being a liar. Two things can be true: that Johnny loves Calgary and is happy here and wants to stay AND finds a better fit closer to home and his family, which he also loves. Most people, if they’re lucky, have had to choose between two things they loved, or two things they wanted, but could only have one. It happens, it’s a sign of a good life.

I’m not going to fault the player if he goes, but it seems like some are ready to blow a gasket.

It’s just hockey.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2022, 08:01 AM   #3827
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Yeah, I don’t know why that particular poster gets so caught up on this issue and always has to bring in the narrative of Johnny being a liar. Two things can be true: that Johnny loves Calgary and is happy here and wants to stay AND finds a better fit closer to home and his family, which he also loves. Most people, if they’re lucky, have had to choose between two things they loved, or two things they wanted, but could only have one. It happens, it’s a sign of a good life.

I’m not going to fault the player if he goes, but it seems like some are ready to blow a gasket.

It’s just hockey.
In the event Johnny chooses to play closer to home I really hope fans cut him some slack and don't turn on him as this isn't Tom Erixon or Adam Fox we are talking about. He came to Calgary, has been an all-time great Flame and by all accounts has enjoyed his time being a Flame and playing in this city. I'm sure this decision is one that has not been easy on him at all and whatever decisions he makes will be done in the best interests of himself and his family and we should respect that.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:27 AM   #3828
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
In the event Johnny chooses to play closer to home I really hope fans cut him some slack and don't turn on him as this isn't Tom Erixon or Adam Fox we are talking about. He came to Calgary, has been an all-time great Flame and by all accounts has enjoyed his time being a Flame and playing in this city. I'm sure this decision is one that has not been easy on him at all and whatever decisions he makes will be done in the best interests of himself and his family and we should respect that.

Anger or booing should be directed at management if he leaves.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:38 AM   #3829
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
Anger or booing should be directed at management if he leaves.
Why?

Its HIS decision alone.

If he wants to play here, he will.

If he wants to move on, he will.

Nothing BT or anyone can do about it.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2022, 08:41 AM   #3830
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Why?

Its HIS decision alone.

If he wants to play here, he will.

If he wants to move on, he will.

Nothing BT or anyone can do about it.
From all the reports he was close to signing long term before the start of the season. I'm thinking BT chose to prioritize guys like Coleman over getting him locked up.

It's hindsight but if he leaves that was a huge mistake.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:43 AM   #3831
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
From all the reports he was close to signing long term before the start of the season. I'm thinking BT chose to prioritize guys like Coleman over getting him locked up.

It's hindsight but if he leaves that was a huge mistake.
I don't recall any reports that said he was close to signing.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2022, 08:44 AM   #3832
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

One of the aggravating human behaviors is the need to assign blame. Why must it be Johnny's fault or the team's fault?
It's the same thing when you get divorced. Who's fault was it?
Someone must be blamed for all things.

Sometimes things just happen and no one is to be blamed.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2022, 08:45 AM   #3833
UnitedFlames
Backup Goalie
 
UnitedFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I don't recall any reports that said he was close to signing.
Correct. There were none.
UnitedFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:48 AM   #3834
Krovikan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
From all the reports he was close to signing long term before the start of the season. I'm thinking BT chose to prioritize guys like Coleman over getting him locked up.



It's hindsight but if he leaves that was a huge mistake.
If that was the case you sign him and worry about the cap issues next summer, like the Oilers did with Nurse okay bad example, but still if he was close the Flames would have signed him.
Krovikan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:48 AM   #3835
Cole436
First Line Centre
 
Cole436's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I don't recall any reports that said he was close to signing.
Johnny mentioned in an afterhours during the PO's that his camp tried to get something done last offseason.
__________________
Cole436 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:50 AM   #3836
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole436 View Post
Johnny mentioned in an afterhours during the PO's that his camp tried to get something done last offseason.
Lot of distance between that and 'close to signing'

I'm sure they tried. Why would they not have.
But I think it's reasonable to also assume that Johnny was prepared to bet on himself if he wasn't happy with the offer.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:52 AM   #3837
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I don't recall seeing any such reports. There may have been initial conversations, but I would expect that would happen if anything out of courtesy.

Having said that, if he was in fact ready and willing to sign an extension last year (confirming he likes it here and prioritized staying), then doing so this year should be a relative no brainer. Arguably nothing has negatively changed from a city/lifestyle perspective (ignoring the noise about the new arena), and from a hockey perspective the team had a breakthrough season last year under Sutter (which is way more attractive to come back to compared to last year's team that missed the playoffs).
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 08:53 AM   #3838
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Yeah, I don’t know why that particular poster gets so caught up on this issue and always has to bring in the narrative of Johnny being a liar. Two things can be true: that Johnny loves Calgary and is happy here and wants to stay AND finds a better fit closer to home and his family, which he also loves. Most people, if they’re lucky, have had to choose between two things they loved, or two things they wanted, but could only have one. It happens, it’s a sign of a good life.

I’m not going to fault the player if he goes, but it seems like some are ready to blow a gasket.

It’s just hockey.
He's basically built his personality over the last two years on Johnny will for sure re-sign and anyone that thinks he won't is an idiot. He's way too emotionally invested to see what happening right in front of him.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2022, 09:12 AM   #3839
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole436 View Post
Johnny mentioned in an afterhours during the PO's that his camp tried to get something done last offseason.
Yup, and the guys on 960 have talked about it many times.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2022, 09:14 AM   #3840
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
When Stamkos signed his contract TB was the opposite of a top team - they missed the POs the season after he signed. Maybe he was prescient But they were still thinking Drouin was a future star.

And of course, when Landeskog signed, the Avs were in a similar position as the Flames. Fresh off a second round exit. And it was clear money was the issue for Landeskog anyway.
You're off by a year on Stamkos - they missed the playoffs in year 1 of his deal.

Stamkos
- TBL was coming off G7ECF and G6 SCF in the 2 previous years
- Florida tax advantage (which is generally overblown, but it's not nothing)
- he had the benefit of the courting period - so he could formally satisfy his curiousity without risking year 8


Landeskog
- COL clearly on the cusp of breaking through: 4 straight PO's; out in G7 G7 G6 of the 2nd rd previous 3 years (CGY's best season in JG's tenure doesn't match any of those)
- The expansion draft may have also created a bit of uncertainty and delayed negotiations a bit (losing Donskoi and his 3.9 AAV probably made it more possible to keep him than if they lost a cheaper D or something).
- Makar, MacKinnon, and Rantanen had clearly surpassed him in importance to the team and he probably took a pretty big discount to stay. The Kuemper trader happened the next day, so it seems COL had a lot of balls in the air - they may have wanted to keep flexibility to resolve their goalie issues
- Sweden is far away from anywhere in NA


There aren't really (m)any similarities with Johnny's situation...it could still happen, but this seems much closer to the NYI (Tavares) and CBJ (Panarin+Bob) situations where the teams tried hard to keep the players...
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flames , stanley cup , win


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy