Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2022, 05:51 PM   #1901
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Does his injury prevent a simple buyout?
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2022, 05:59 PM   #1902
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaErtz View Post
What would it take to get Monahan's contract off the books? A first round pick?
He will be on LTIR until the Flames have another injury and activate him

We will be the cheaters next season
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2022, 06:31 PM   #1903
cam_wmh
Franchise Player
 
cam_wmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati View Post
I believe they did away with that in the last CBA signed in 2020.
You mean, they have all summer to sign him to 8 years?
cam_wmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2022, 06:37 PM   #1904
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_wmh View Post
You mean, they have all summer to sign him to 8 years?
Well they have as long as it takes for him to sign any sort of contract, with any team. For 8 years, I think the deadline is July 1st (or first day of free agency) I believe.

Just that the pre-FA courting period is legally not part of the CBA. I’m sure conversations are had, though. There is no way so many free agents are announced as signings minutes into the free agency, if that didn’t happen
agulati is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2022, 07:22 PM   #1905
cam_wmh
Franchise Player
 
cam_wmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati View Post
Well they have as long as it takes for him to sign any sort of contract, with any team.

Just that the pre-FA courting period is legally not part of the CBA. I’m sure conversations are had, though. There is no way so many free agents are announced as signings minutes into the free agency, if that didn’t happen
Yeah I understood that part.

Quote:
For 8 years, I think the deadline is July 1st (or first day of free agency) I believe.
It should be a rule tho'; Having the team that owned the players rights pre-TDL, to have the right to offer 8 years all summer. Basically, providing time into actual Free Agency, so the player can come back to his home club's offer. vs the rushed courting period.
cam_wmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2022, 11:07 PM   #1906
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_wmh View Post
Yeah I understood that part.



It should be a rule tho'; Having the team that owned the players rights pre-TDL, to have the right to offer 8 years all summer. Basically, providing time into actual Free Agency, so the player can come back to his home club's offer. vs the rushed courting period.
Yes this does seems strange to me. Why can’t a player go, explore other options and decide to sign with their prior team? Doesn’t really seem to favour players teams or agents so I don’t understand why not.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2022, 11:57 PM   #1907
BigRed
#1 Goaltender
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati View Post
Tkachuk did have 77 points on Backlund’s wing back in 2018-19. Though he probably did see PP time with Johnny

Yes for sure, he’s a great player. But they are both that much better together. Finding that kind of chemistry at any time your career is pretty rare. These guys have it in hand. Have to think that is a motivating factor for a number of reasons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User View Post
I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again
BigRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 04:23 AM   #1908
Britflamesfan
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

To me a lot comes down to how JG performs in the playoffs. If he disappears again then you have to think long and hard about committing such large sums to a player who does not play well when the playing gets tough. So with both players getting paid very large sums of money we will be losing probably half our defence and maybe Eat Bread as well. Its going to be a very different team next year, one way or another.
Britflamesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 05:11 AM   #1909
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britflamesfan View Post
To me a lot comes down to how JG performs in the playoffs. If he disappears again then you have to think long and hard about committing such large sums to a player who does not play well when the playing gets tough. So with both players getting paid very large sums of money we will be losing probably half our defence and maybe Eat Bread as well. Its going to be a very different team next year, one way or another.
Lets see what Johnny does with healthy line mates this time around, the only time he did he had 9 points in 11 games, being saddled to a broken Monahan and double teamed doesn't mean he disappeared.
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2022, 07:23 AM   #1910
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

1) Pinder doesn't know what the Flames are willing to offer, and

2) He doesn't even know if they're willing to offer 8 years.

So for him to use the word 'undoubtedly' is a bit of a stretch. The point he was trying to make is valid, in that an 8 year offer would probably be a bigger total amount than any 7 year year deal, but there is no certainty here.

As JayRandom pointed out however, there are advantages to being able to offer an 8 year deal, which gives them more flexibility than other teams.

So I'll say this: if Gaudreau signs with Calgary (and I think he will), I think it is very likely to be an 8 year deal. Because for any other term, it is too easy to get outbid.

Conversely, I think it's quite possible Tkachuk signs a shorter term. I could even see something like a 3 year deal. Lots of cross currents here.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2022, 08:12 AM   #1911
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Depending on how the playoffs go, I bet they package the “C” with Tkachuk’s extension. Keith wore the C, Brady has the C — don’t think that isn’t lost on Matthew…
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 11:01 AM   #1912
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
1) Pinder doesn't know what the Flames are willing to offer, and

2) He doesn't even know if they're willing to offer 8 years.

So for him to use the word 'undoubtedly' is a bit of a stretch. The point he was trying to make is valid, in that an 8 year offer would probably be a bigger total amount than any 7 year year deal, but there is no certainty here.

As JayRandom pointed out however, there are advantages to being able to offer an 8 year deal, which gives them more flexibility than other teams.

So I'll say this: if Gaudreau signs with Calgary (and I think he will), I think it is very likely to be an 8 year deal. Because for any other term, it is too easy to get outbid.

Conversely, I think it's quite possible Tkachuk signs a shorter term. I could even see something like a 3 year deal. Lots of cross currents here.

If the Flames are not willing to offer Johnny 8 years, they may as well sell the team, as they obviously aren't willing to do what is necessary to keep elite talent.

Whether 8 years will age well with Johnny is really meaningless. It's the cost of contending. You need to be prepared to plug your nose and sign these deals or be a forever bubble team.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2022, 11:03 AM   #1913
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Johnny is going to win the Conn Smythe trophy.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 11:59 AM   #1914
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy View Post
Johnny is going to win the Conn Smythe trophy.
That's way better than the Hart. I know a goalie has won in a losing cause on occasion, but has a non-goalie ever won after losing? It can't be often.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2022, 12:01 PM   #1915
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
That's way better than the Hart. I know a goalie has won in a losing cause on occasion, but has a non-goalie ever won after losing? It can't be often.
Reggie Leach in 1976 is the only time
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2022, 12:21 PM   #1916
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Reggie Leach in 1976 is the only time
There was a lot of talk about the possibility of Peter Forsberg winning the Conn Smythe in 2002, even though Colorado was eliminated in the third round. He had missed the entire offseason, preseason and regular season recovering from a ruptured spleen and multiple foot surgeries, but came back in time for the playoffs... and was the leading scorer in the playoffs without his team even playing in the Finals. It ended up going to Lidstrom.

FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FanIn80 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-21-2022, 03:20 PM   #1917
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
If the Flames are not willing to offer Johnny 8 years, they may as well sell the team, as they obviously aren't willing to do what is necessary to keep elite talent.

Whether 8 years will age well with Johnny is really meaningless. It's the cost of contending. You need to be prepared to plug your nose and sign these deals or be a forever bubble team.
The Flames are certainly prepared to offer 8 years. The intersection of $ and those 8 years is the question. as with most long term deals you have to understand that the last couple years are not going to be "value" years. And for JG the question will be - is that 8 year deal more than I can get on 7 or less in FA? Counting taxes.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 03:55 PM   #1918
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau can get 8 years with another team if they offer the Flames something worth their while to accommodate prior to the start of free agency.

I recall last offseason the Oilers were trying to do that with the Leafs and Hyman but whatever the Oilers offered Toronto wasn’t worth it to them
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 04:34 PM   #1919
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Gaudreau can get 8 years with another team if they offer the Flames something worth their while to accommodate prior to the start of free agency.

I recall last offseason the Oilers were trying to do that with the Leafs and Hyman but whatever the Oilers offered Toronto wasn’t worth it to them
It would have to be a sign and trade. Only Calgary can now sign him to a 8 year deal once the trade deadline has passed.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2022, 06:05 PM   #1920
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
It would have to be a sign and trade. Only Calgary can now sign him to a 8 year deal once the trade deadline has passed.
Exactly. Toronto let Hyman negotiate with other teams and once he came to terms with the Oilers they planned to negotiate a trade on an 8 year deal. Toronto wanted a 2nd/3rd and the Oilers wanted to send a 6th/7th and when they couldn’t agree Hyman signed for 7 years at the same total $ he was going to sign the 8 year deal for.

If a team wants to give Johnny $84M the Flames could ask for a decent return as the difference in cap from $12M to 10.5M is significant. Hopefully he just signs for that deal in Calgary
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flames , stanley cup , win


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy