Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2022, 09:26 AM   #401
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
I hate whataboutism arguments, but anyone annoyed by the dumb $100k against Quebec idea should be at least 300 times more outraged by the continued existence of PEAS - the Provincial Embezzlement Agency, Sasquatch!
The annoyance wasn’t about the money, it was about the mayor dedicating time and energy to an issue totally outside the remit of Calgary governance. Traditionally, voters want their elected municipal governments to focus on practical, local matters, and leave the ideological grandstanding to provincial and federal politicians.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2022, 09:33 AM   #402
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
I'm willing to cut this council some slack just because we knew ahead of time that this was going to be a very tough stretch for the city. Not a coincidence a lot of the former council left when they did
That's fair. But much of the stuff with Gondek (ie Quebec nonsense, inability to use Twitter like an adult) are self inflicted issues.

Since this is CP: you can be playing the top team in the league, but everyone will still be upset at a defenseman if he takes lazy offensive zone penalties and scores an own goal.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2022, 10:37 AM   #403
The Fisher Account
Scoring Winger
 
The Fisher Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy View Post
Speaking of Nenshi, what is doing these days for employment or do we know what he’s going to do? I imagine he has opportunities.
Meeting with party suitors? Practicing his conversational french more? Strategizing?
The Fisher Account is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2022, 01:29 PM   #404
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy View Post
Speaking of Nenshi, what is doing these days for employment or do we know what he’s going to do? I imagine he has opportunities.
Taking a well-deserved break, I hope.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 08:47 AM   #405
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

I probably heard about this previously and I just don't remember but some communities in Calgary will have private garbage collection now instead of the city service. What seems odd to me is that this is a 7 year trial program. 7 years seems like a really long term for a trial program.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/local...box=1649025729
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 10:07 AM   #406
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
I probably heard about this previously and I just don't remember but some communities in Calgary will have private garbage collection now instead of the city service. What seems odd to me is that this is a 7 year trial program. 7 years seems like a really long term for a trial program.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/local...box=1649025729
I don't understand the point of privatizing essential public sector jobs other than making a few people more wealthy. Pay less to a private company to pick up garbage, residents receive a worst quality of service due to said company cutting corners to make a profit, residents complain to the city who end up having to send their own trucks back out to resolve issues, and more money gets spent than the original setup. Why the hell would the council approve this?
Hemi-Cuda is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Hemi-Cuda For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 10:11 AM   #407
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
I probably heard about this previously and I just don't remember but some communities in Calgary will have private garbage collection now instead of the city service. What seems odd to me is that this is a 7 year trial program. 7 years seems like a really long term for a trial program.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/local...box=1649025729
I understood it is a seven year trial because no waste disposal company had sufficient (spare) fleet capacity/availability to undertake the pilot for a shorter period.
para transit fellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 10:32 AM   #408
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
I don't understand the point of privatizing essential public sector jobs other than making a few people more wealthy. Pay less to a private company to pick up garbage, residents receive a worst quality of service due to said company cutting corners to make a profit, residents complain to the city who end up having to send their own trucks back out to resolve issues, and more money gets spent than the original setup. Why the hell would the council approve this?
Pure speculation but pensions might be becoming an issue for municipalities. DB pensions are expensive, there's a reason many private (non government) businesses have moved away from them.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lubicon For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 10:39 AM   #409
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Pure speculation but pensions might be becoming an issue for municipalities. DB pensions are expensive, there's a reason many private (non government) businesses have moved away from them.
Lobbying from private industry is more likely to be the reason. It’s not as if the policy makers are giving up their DB pensions.
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to iggy_oi For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 10:51 AM   #410
WhiteTiger
Franchise Player
 
WhiteTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
I don't understand the point of privatizing essential public sector jobs
Answer:

Quote:
other than making a few people more wealthy.
WhiteTiger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WhiteTiger For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 11:26 AM   #411
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
I don't understand the point of privatizing essential public sector jobs other than making a few people more wealthy. Pay less to a private company to pick up garbage, residents receive a worst quality of service due to said company cutting corners to make a profit, residents complain to the city who end up having to send their own trucks back out to resolve issues, and more money gets spent than the original setup. Why the hell would the council approve this?
It's only been a failure anywhere else that's tried it, but hell, why don't we try it too!
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 12:33 PM   #412
Ironhorse
Franchise Player
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
It's only been a failure anywhere else that's tried it, but hell, why don't we try it too!
*Citation needed.
Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 01:02 PM   #413
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironhorse View Post
*Citation needed.
It's been studied a lot over the decades, but I'll just copy and paste my post from the last time this got brought up

Quote:
What normally happens is it's cheaper the first few years to make everyone happy. Then companies start increasing their prices (if allowed in the contract, usually a set % each year if at all) and lowering their service levels the absolute most they can get away with (Which is a lot). Then before you know it you're paying more for less, and have no control over addressing it without very expensive lawsuits. Manage to get out of the contract? Companies already know what the other guy was getting paid, they aren't giving you an honest bid. Plus what company has several hundred trucks just sitting around hoping a city calls them? Rinse and repeat. By then you can't go back because you sold off all your own equipment and can't do it yourself without the same massive start up cost that prevented more companies even bidding in the first place. Simply isn't going to happen within a city budget.

Governments like the idea because it gives them a very simple flat rate fee, one less massive headache to worry about, in theory. It makes sense for small cities and towns, but not big cities.

Edit: Plus, privitization usually means the bulk of the money leaves the province

It's just a pilot at least, maybe the whole thing flops and we go back to how it was. Trouble is, companies aren't dumb, they're on their best behaviour during a pilot

Here's one study, I'll just copy and paste part of the conclusion


Quote:
The idea of private waste collection may sound appealing to some. But in
reality, it has proven to have limited success and, given the amount of monitoring associated with trying to make private waste collection work for the
public good, it may be more of a headache than it’s worth. In general, local governments are primarily seeking to reduce their costs by contracting
out service delivery. In residential waste collection specifically, these sav-
ings are far from guaranteed. Decades of empirical research from jurisdictions across North America and Europe show no clear connection between
private waste collection and cost reductions. Moreover, cost savings appear
to be increasingly less likely.
The two main reasons why private waste collection fails to reduce municipal costs: (1) a widespread lack of competition, and (2) large and often
unaccounted for transaction costs. Research shows, for instance, a broad
trend in the waste collection market toward private oligopolies, where markets are heavily dominated by just a few firms.
https://policyalternatives.ca/sites/...;s%20Worth.pdf



What I personally like is the city offers limited service (Like every other week) to save a bit of $, then if you personally need more garbage collection then that you can pay for another private service to come on those off weeks. I know that exists in Edmonton and it's like an extra $25 a month.

Last edited by btimbit; 04-04-2022 at 01:12 PM.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 01:04 PM   #414
The Fisher Account
Scoring Winger
 
The Fisher Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Imagine the audacity of paying a Calgarian a living wage instead of privatizing that job, outsourcing the work to the lowest bidder and sending the profits out of the province.
The Fisher Account is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to The Fisher Account For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 01:10 PM   #415
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Imagine the audacity of paying a Calgarian a living wage instead of privatizing that job, outsourcing the work to the lowest bidder and sending the profits out of the province.
Screw those entitled city workers, my dad's cousin's son's dog used to be a city worker and he said they do nothing all day! Meanwhile these foreign company owners are struggling to get by, some even had to downsize their yachts!

Last edited by btimbit; 04-04-2022 at 01:17 PM.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 01:24 PM   #416
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Imagine the audacity of paying a Calgarian a living wage instead of privatizing that job, outsourcing the work to the lowest bidder and sending the profits out of the province.
Surely there is a gap between a poverty level wage and a living wage with a DB pension though? I mean there is nothing wrong with a decent wage, benefits and even a DC pension for a non-skilled worker?

While we don't see a lot of examples in this thread about municipalities that have tried and failed to use private waste collection, we all know of entities with a lot of DB pension exposure that have suffered through the years.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2022, 01:36 PM   #417
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
It's only been a failure anywhere else that's tried it, but hell, why don't we try it too!
In Calgary most, maybe all, multi-family residence and business garbage collection is done by private companies isn't it? I don't know a lot about that stuff but is it successful or a failure?

Last edited by calgarygeologist; 04-04-2022 at 01:51 PM.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 01:42 PM   #418
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
In Calgary most, maybe all, multi-family residence and business garbage collection is done by private companies isn't it? I don't know a lot of about that stuff but is it successful or a failure?
I live in a condo building and up until about a year and a half ago, our dumpster was done by the city and most of the others that share our alley were as well.

GFL gave us a great deal that beat the city, so we switched.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 01:47 PM   #419
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
In Calgary most, maybe all, multi-family residence and business garbage collection is done by private companies isn't it? I don't know a lot of about that stuff but is it successful or a failure?
The city will do multi family garbage but not compost or recycle.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 02:24 PM   #420
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Surely there is a gap between a poverty level wage and a living wage with a DB pension though? I mean there is nothing wrong with a decent wage, benefits and even a DC pension for a non-skilled worker?
I’m sure it’s easy for you to say there’s nothing wrong with it when you’re not the one having to retire on it. There’s little to no guarantees with a DC plan.

Quote:
While we don't see a lot of examples in this thread about municipalities that have tried and failed to use private waste collection, we all know of entities with a lot of DB pension exposure that have suffered through the years.
Outsourcing or switching to a DC plan will increase the burden by leaving the plan with less employees paying into it, increasing the likelihood of insolvency.
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy