Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
well start by considering the quality of chance. Expecting him to stop a deflected shot is silly. The second goal was perfectly placed with a partial screen in one of the tough locations for a goalie to stop. Yes he was deep in his net, but that's in part because of blown coverage that led to the chance.
So evaluate it in context and not something silly like "3 goals on 10 shots".
|
Among goalies who have played 30+ games Markstrom is:
- 25th in high danger save percentage above expected;
- 15th in goals saved above expected per 60;
- 9th in low danger save percentage above expected:
- 13th in medium danger save percentage above expected;
- 3rd in goals against average;
- 5th in save percentage;
- 1st in shutouts
Flames are:
- 1st in expected goals percentage
- 2nd in Corsi
- 3rd in expected goal differential
- 1st in expected goals against (lowest)
- 1st in high danger shots allowed (fewest)
In the statistics which are meant to isolate the goalie performance from the team performance Markstrom is average. In the metrics which are are more team dependant Markstrom looks elite.
In terms of defensive play the Flames are elite.
There is certainly an argument to be made that Markstrom's elite numbers are the result of elite defensive team play.