Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2022, 12:09 PM   #61
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
OK. But Monahan and Backlund have made equally great passes this year, and did so in their rookie years too, and no one would ever think they are elite playmakers.
That's fair. Time will tell I guess.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 12:26 PM   #62
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Its a ridiculously small sample size, but Ruzicka has the hands to be an elite playmaker IMO. ...
I do like Ruzicka, but the "elite playmaker" part is a bit on the edmontonesque side of expectations... He seems to be a tweener: inconsistent level of effort, frequent irresponsible plays, lack of effort and energy. They guy's only 22 and he chooses when to play hard and when to cruise along. These are not the tell signs of an elite NHL'er. There is a reason Sutter shrugs all media questions about Ruzicka with short "needs consistency" responses.
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 12:30 PM   #63
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Alright I'm taking a beating. Let's change that to "has the potential to be an exceptional player"

Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 12:33 PM   #64
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I could see Chris Tierney being a guy we add.

Played C in San Jose, playing more LW for Ottawa, so has some versitility. Strong underlying defensive metrics. Really fits with what Sutter / Treliving have added to the team this season.

Also was very strong for San Jose in 2015-2016 playoffs, and Darryl Sutter had a front row seat for that.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 03-15-2022 at 12:37 PM.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 12:36 PM   #65
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
...
Callie Jarnkrok...
Paul Stastny...
Andrew Copp...
Jack Roslovic, Colombus Blue Jacks
Rickard Rakell, Anaheim Ducks
Vladislav Namestnikov, Detroit Red Wings
Sam Gagner, Detroit Red Wings

Who is your preference?
...
On the OP's question, Jarnkrok is by far our best option in so many respects, but many other contenders see it too, want him too and the ask will be very high. I doubt Treliving will pay. So, likely, a pipe dream; not gonna happen.

I also like Getzlaf/Stastny/Staal/Rakell - in that order - as possible rental options for a reasonable cost. How awesome would it be to have Getzlaf centering Toffoli and Mangiapane in the playoffs???

Sam Gagner is just so NOT a Sutter's kind of a player. I recall a hilarious gif of him trying to hit Glencross and just ricocheting back.
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 12:45 PM   #66
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

The Flames really are in a bit of a conundrum as a contender. Backlund really shouldn't be you second best centre. The Flames have "depth" at center but the drop off after Lindolm is pretty steep. I think they make up for with depth and quality in other areas, but the centre depth for this group is a bit of a concern.

So what do you do? I firmly believe an in season Monahan move just isn't on the table. He wears an A, he makes too much, he has a limited NTC and he's not performing. If that move is made its better made in the offseason. Heck if he performs well in the Playoffs, perhaps his stock goes up.

So then what? With limited cap you try to upgrade the 3C spot. The interesting thing is that the Flames have 3 legitimate options for that spot. Ruzicka, Dube and Richardson. A rotation of those 3 in a playoff series isn't the worst thing in the world. You'd like an upgrade there, but a healthy competition for that spot wouldn't be the worst thing.

On paper you'd want to see an upgrade at centre, but when you hash it all out is the net benefit really worth it.
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 01:24 PM   #67
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
On the OP's question, Jarnkrok is by far our best option in so many respects, but many other contenders see it too, want him too and the ask will be very high. I doubt Treliving will pay. So, likely, a pipe dream; not gonna happen.

I also like Getzlaf/Stastny/Staal/Rakell - in that order - as possible rental options for a reasonable cost. How awesome would it be to have Getzlaf centering Toffoli and Mangiapane in the playoffs???

Sam Gagner is just so NOT a Sutter's kind of a player. I recall a hilarious gif of him trying to hit Glencross and just ricocheting back.
Lucic - Getzalf - Lewis. The California gated community line.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 02:51 PM   #68
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Does my cap logic make sense:

So Flames will have $865,210 in cap space at the trade deadline per CapFriendly

You could send down Ruzicka if you make a trade to give an extra $800k to get to $1.665m.

You could also waive one of Richardson and Ritchie to get to ~$2.5m. If you get a defenseman - could also add Stone to that list to get up to ~$3.2m.

Anything more than that - and you'd have to route a guy through one of the bottom feeders to eat up cap space.

Last edited by PeteMoss; 03-15-2022 at 02:54 PM.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 03:09 PM   #69
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Does my cap logic make sense:

So Flames will have $865,210 in cap space at the trade deadline per CapFriendly

You could send down Ruzicka if you make a trade to give an extra $800k to get to $1.665m.

You could also waive one of Richardson and Ritchie to get to ~$2.5m. If you get a defenseman - could also add Stone to that list to get up to ~$3.2m.

Anything more than that - and you'd have to route a guy through one of the bottom feeders to eat up cap space.
If you send down Ruzicka, don't you just save his pro-rated cap hit until the end of the season? 200k ish?
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 03:51 PM   #70
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
I do like Ruzicka, but the "elite playmaker" part is a bit on the edmontonesque side of expectations... He seems to be a tweener: inconsistent level of effort, frequent irresponsible plays, lack of effort and energy. They guy's only 22 and he chooses when to play hard and when to cruise along. These are not the tell signs of an elite NHL'er. There is a reason Sutter shrugs all media questions about Ruzicka with short "needs consistency" responses.
I often wonder how much of the bolded for young players is from thinking/overthinking. Charging like a bull at the wrong-time/wrong-place is a great way to get burned or take a penalty.

The game is so much faster...some times less is more.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 05:15 PM   #71
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

I like to think of Ruzicka as "composed". Just look at his goal celebrations; very ho-hum, no biggie.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2022, 05:52 PM   #72
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
I often wonder how much of the bolded for young players is from thinking/overthinking. Charging like a bull at the wrong-time/wrong-place is a great way to get burned or take a penalty.

The game is so much faster...some times less is more.
This is Dube IMO. He plays with energy most nights, but a lot of the time it’s ill spent, along the boards, and he does take a few penalties along the way.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 06:08 PM   #73
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
This is Dube IMO. He plays with energy most nights, but a lot of the time it’s ill spent, along the boards, and he does take a few penalties along the way.
Yup; sometimes it's better to get to the same place unimpeded a quarter second slower than fighting the long way through an opponent and maybe ending up on your ass. There's a time and place for both...it usually takes a few hundred NHL games to figure it out.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 06:51 PM   #74
indes
First Line Centre
 
indes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Exp:
Default

Surprised the flames haven't played the LTIR card with Monahan yet. Or since it's the Flames this is probably the first season of his career that he has no ailments lol.
indes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 07:17 PM   #75
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indes View Post
Surprised the flames haven't played the LTIR card with Monahan yet. Or since it's the Flames this is probably the first season of his career that he has no ailments lol.
Unless they need cap room there’s no reason to play any card.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2022, 08:12 PM   #76
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Hey Winnipeg, you can stop winning games anytime now. We'd like to poach your roster.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy