03-15-2022, 09:39 AM
|
#9901
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
^
But who knows how good the team would be with a new player? We know how good the team is with Johnny and Tkachuk as the best players. It's really good.
Why change the plan just because you think something might be better?
I hope if we acquire Chiarot, Pelletier is not involved. But IMO we do have to keep up with Colorado in some respects.
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 09:41 AM
|
#9902
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
I think that no matter what happens, Calgary wants to extend their window for at least another year. Tarasenko + Neighbors + 2023 1st would be the start. Kryou is good but doesn't drive the play like Tarasenko. If they can only keep one of Johnny or Matty, they keep Johnny. Ideally keep both somehow.
|
The whole purpose of moving Tkachuk to get a decent replacement yes, but also to be able to sign the rest of the roster. Only way we get Tarasenko is if St.Louis is willing to retain 50%. I highly doubt they are. If they would then that would be a good move.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 09:44 AM
|
#9903
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Ben Chiarot for Monahan + Kylington
Or Ben Chiarot for Monahan + ...
and Kylington for 3rd line C.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 09:52 AM
|
#9904
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewFan
Ben Chiarot for Monahan + Kylington
Or Ben Chiarot for Monahan + ...
and Kylington for 3rd line C.
|
 
Are you trying to make the team worse?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 09:56 AM
|
#9905
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Are you trying to make the team worse?
|
I just saw "The hockey writers" news "Flames & Canadiens Having Discussions on Chiarot & Pelletier"
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 09:59 AM
|
#9906
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okotoks
|
Dear Ken Holland. Ben Chairot is exactly what your team needs to put it over the top. Swoop in and get him before anyone else can!
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:04 AM
|
#9907
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermexico
Dear Ken Holland. Ben Chairot is exactly what your team needs to put it over the top. Swoop in and get him before anyone else can!
|
Bourgeault + pick for Chiarot is a perfect trade.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:18 AM
|
#9908
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm not against picking up another defenseman - hell, I'm all for it - because you can never have too many during the playoffs.
My issue with it is that I think we need a forward more. And I don't think we have the cap space for both.
Given the choice, I would much rather add a middle-6 forward
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:19 AM
|
#9909
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewFan
I just saw "The hockey writers" news "Flames & Canadiens Having Discussions on Chiarot & Pelletier"
|
And so you thought you would up the offer?
I don't think that's how negotiations are supposed to work
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:19 AM
|
#9910
|
|
Franchise Player
|
It's a buyer's market on D this year, zero chance Chiarot gets Pelletier.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:22 AM
|
#9911
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
If the Flames want rentals, and they want both a forward and defenseman, they can get what they want so long as they are truly prepared to go "all in" and spend 2023 picks and/or a top prospect like Pelletier. If they want to package someone like Monahan on the way out they'll end up paying even more.
Thats the fun of going all in. You can leave with nothing. They could spend the picks, lose a top prospect and get bounced in round 1.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:27 AM
|
#9912
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames GM Treliving ahead of trade deadline: 'We’re certainly looking to add to our roster'
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article...to-our-roster/
Quote:
|
“We’re certainly a team that’s looking to add to our roster, not take off it, so you’re the one who has to be a little more proactive because people aren’t coming for your players,” said Treliving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:31 AM
|
#9914
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Bringing Pelletier up to play would have a more positive impact on the team than trading for Chariot.
You’re taking a good defender out of the lineup to play Chariot. You’re taking a plug forward out to inject Pelletier into the lineup.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
|
8sPOT,
bigrangy,
BigRed,
Cycling76er,
etc,
Flames_F.T.W,
Flamezzz,
howard_the_duck,
Jore,
Mass_nerder,
MrMike,
Poe969,
Roof-Daddy,
Savvy27,
Scroopy Noopers,
Swifty16,
UKflames
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:37 AM
|
#9915
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
What about 1st 2023 + Monahan for Giroux?
Solves allot of off season problems as well as helps go for it this year.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:38 AM
|
#9916
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
What about 1st 2023 + Monahan for Giroux?
Solves allot of off season problems as well as helps go for it this year.
|
I think it’s been publicly stated that Giroux would not waive to come to Calgary.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:49 AM
|
#9918
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
What about 1st 2023 + Monahan for Giroux?
Solves allot of off season problems as well as helps go for it this year.
|
Philly wouldn't do it even if Giroux waived. Prevents them from signing him back next year.
The value of Giroux is likely a 1st+. They may retain, but they won't take a large non-expiring contract back, because they don't have to. They would just keep him before they did that.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:54 AM
|
#9919
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226
Performance wise, yeah absolutely look to move Monahan at the deadline.
I worry what it would do to the dressing room on a reportedly tight knit group.
Almost smells like the Ference for Stuart trade. That reportedly really rocked the room.
|
100% this.
Best post of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
03-15-2022, 10:57 AM
|
#9920
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Philly wouldn't do it even if Giroux waived. Prevents them from signing him back next year.
The value of Giroux is likely a 1st+. They may retain, but they won't take a large non-expiring contract back, because they don't have to. They would just keep him before they did that.
|
I also don't know why people aren't hearing that it's widely believed Giroux won't come to a Canadian team.
Giroux is a non starter for the Flames. It ain't happening.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.
|
|
