03-02-2022, 01:40 PM
|
#2461
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kn
This scares the crap out of me. My wife and daughter have a flight out on the 8th. I’ve tried to convince her to leave earlier but she’s convinced everything will be fine. I don’t know if she’s delusional or if I’m unnecessarily panicking.
Most of the earlier flights require a transfer or stay in Moscow and she refuses to go there. The only other alternatives are Uzbekistan or Kyrgyzstan.
Not looking forward to watching my family through the internet for the next decade...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Dude, learn from my mistake. Better you argue with her about it and have her hate you for a couple days, but be together sooner than later. This is a very dynamic situation. Don't want to risk it.
Last edited by Huntingwhale; 03-02-2022 at 01:43 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
|
Ace,
afc wimbledon,
bdubbs,
burn_this_city,
Calgary Highlander,
Cycling76er,
DoubleF,
Duruss,
emti,
FLAMESRULE,
Frequitude,
Fuzz,
greyshep,
kipperiggy,
kn,
Maritime Q-Scout,
Mazrim,
Pizza,
prarieboy,
Puppet Guy,
redflamesfan08,
Sliver,
SportsJunky,
stang,
Stillman16,
Thor,
vennegoor of hesselink,
you&me
|
03-02-2022, 01:41 PM
|
#2462
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Frankly, there's at least some question about whether or not NATO would actually respond if, say, Lithuania was attacked as opposed to one of the countries we actually care about, but I think honestly the answer is, if you let them into NATO you have to be prepared to defend them whether they're Romania or Latvia or England. No difference in the required response. So I guess that answers your question about where the red line is.
|
Yes, if NATO isn’t prepared to defend a member nation, then it’s a paper tiger. So member states take Article 5 very seriously.
But that also plays into who gets let in. NATO is a defensive pact meant to make its members more secure. Ukraine has been pleading for admission for years, but the consensus among NATO members has been sorry, but that would make the alliance more likely to get embroiled in a major war with a nuclear power - make members less secure rather than more. So Ukraine’s requests were denied.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:05 PM
|
#2464
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
|
Good, too bad it isn’t higher
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:29 PM
|
#2466
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
All this stuff about NATO actually posing a military threat is Russian propaganda. NATO was not going to start a nuclear war with Russia.
|
I think we can safely make some assumptions:
1. Putin was not at all worried about NATO. If he was actually afraid of NATO, instigating a war would make no sense.
2. Putin attacked Ukraine to annex it. They've already slipped put propaganda articles to be released after the war how Ukraine happily joins Russia.
3. Annexing Ukraine has been a longterm plan, so really it was more about when was this gonna happen, not if.
So why now?
I don't believe that Ukraine making moves to join EU and NATO were a threat to Russia. I think that's just Putins propaganda. It did however threaten to become a barrier to annexing Ukraine. Gotta do the attack before that happens.
Also, NATO was/is a mess after Trump and Brexit, but Biden was working hard to get NATO and US international alliances in general back into shape. Why take the risk that Biden might succeed.
This was the time.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:29 PM
|
#2467
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
https://twitter.com/user/status/1499131565779169287
I'd like to enter a bid of....$13.79. But someone else is going to have to cover the fuel costs.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:33 PM
|
#2468
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by curves2000
Any idea why Ukraine hasn't been able to be offensive and launch rockets into Russia and hit the troops stationed at the border? Taking out vital supplies and equipment?
Obv that would be an escalation and would warrant a response. I am just wondering if it's an equipment and weaponry issue, a tactical issue, an escalation issue or what?
Perhaps Ukraine has been targeting military installations directly in Russia and I am not aware of that.
Thanks
|
Because if they do that then they’re essentially opening up the floodgates for the Russians to retaliate how they see fit. So escalation.
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:48 PM
|
#2469
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by curves2000
Any idea why Ukraine hasn't been able to be offensive and launch rockets into Russia and hit the troops stationed at the border? Taking out vital supplies and equipment?
Obv that would be an escalation and would warrant a response. I am just wondering if it's an equipment and weaponry issue, a tactical issue, an escalation issue or what?
Perhaps Ukraine has been targeting military installations directly in Russia and I am not aware of that.
Thanks
|
Early on there was a report of a rocket attack on a Russian base near Rostov-on-Don and video released of a drone attack of a fuel train supposedly in the Crimea.
Most likely Ukraine doesn't have any long-range weapons capable of striking inside Russian territory left or Russian air defenses are able to stop them.
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:52 PM
|
#2470
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InternationalVillager
Because if they do that then they’re essentially opening up the floodgates for the Russians to retaliate how they see fit. So escalation.
|
I think you couldn't be more wrong.
If Ukraine attacked civilian targets, sure, but fighting back against the troops that have attacked them isn't escalating anything.
I just believe that they're unable to.
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:53 PM
|
#2471
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
|
CP group buy?
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:56 PM
|
#2473
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Sell off all the Oligarch plunder and use it to rebuild Ukraine in the future.
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 02:59 PM
|
#2474
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostandIn
|
It's happening.
Think of Putin and the oligarchs like the mafia. Make him worth more dead than alive and it is only a matter of time until someone in his inner circle takes him out.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 03:05 PM
|
#2475
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut
|
To call Kherson a major city is saying the fall of St Catharines is a major city
Both rank at 17th most populated in Ukraine and Canada and similar populations.
Even should Kyiv fall over upcoming days / weeks, Ukraine is not capitulating anytime soon. Kharkhiv despite being on the border and highest at risk will continue to have some heavy battling as well
Ukraine has a ton of fight left, and each day that Ukraine fights is another day that Putin's noose is getting tighter in Russia.
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 03:14 PM
|
#2477
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Let's remember that Putin's leaked pre-written propaganda news was declaring the fall of Kyiv on day 2.
|
|
|
03-02-2022, 03:15 PM
|
#2478
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
|
They should part it out and provide the proceeds to Ukraine.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Firebot For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 03:19 PM
|
#2479
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
To call Kherson a major city is saying the fall of St Catharines is a major city
Both rank at 17th most populated in Ukraine and Canada and similar populations.
Even should Kyiv fall over upcoming days / weeks, Ukraine is not capitulating anytime soon. Kharkhiv despite being on the border and highest at risk will continue to have some heavy battling as well
Ukraine has a ton of fight left, and each day that Ukraine fights is another day that Putin's noose is getting tighter in Russia.
|
If the video posted by InternationalVillager is to be taken at face value into why Putin's regime is doing what it is going, Kherson is a major city for the Russians beyond taking Ukraine's population to annex the entire country. It would be a significant strategic point in terms of resolving the blocked fresh water supply from Ukraine to Crimea.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DoubleF For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-02-2022, 03:20 PM
|
#2480
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
They should part it out and provide the proceeds to Ukraine.
|
I think it's probably worth a lot more in one piece. boats aren't something you really re-use parts from. Maybe one of America's super-villians would like it?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 PM.
|
|