Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2021, 08:10 PM   #201
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning View Post
Thank you for this.

This is very realistic. The city is 90% bureaucratic, not responsive to small business and always involved in Ascent of taxes.

When it comes to any issue they are involved they employ the top law firm in Calgary at taxpayer expense. So you cannot hire a better team to combat them.

People are blind.
I...don't think kermitology was making the point you think he was making.
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:10 PM   #202
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214 View Post
13500 BTC to buy the Flames, that should do it.
Will they accept Dogecoin?
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:13 PM   #203
calgarywinning
First Line Centre
 
calgarywinning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
I...don't think kermitology was making the point you think he was making.
No that is the point.
calgarywinning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:16 PM   #204
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Pike gets a mention in Friedman's 32 thoughts about his coverage. Well done sir! That's bucket list sh** right there.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:17 PM   #205
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

I like how those who consistently tell CSEC to f off (like White Out and others) assume the owners are moving forward without risk.

Who knows what the landscape will look like in Calgary post-pandemic given inflation, the downtown vacancy rate (actual near 50%) and a much changed energy sector? And on top of very little playoff success for this franchise.

Hell with 25 year plus STHs like me sitting out the season because of COVID and not sure I will even renew given the uncertainty regarding seat locations and sight lines in the new building (btw the Saddledome is excellent in that regard), the future of NHL hockey in this town is very suspect to begin with.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Manhattanboy For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:20 PM   #206
Deegee
First Line Centre
 
Deegee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Exp:
Default

It's bad enough I have to live in Edmonton for work, but if I have to live in Edmonton and have the Flames move over egos I'll be right pissed off.
Deegee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:20 PM   #207
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning View Post
Thank you for this.

This is very realistic. The city is 90% bureaucratic, not responsive to small business and always involved in Ascent of taxes.

When it comes to any issue they are involved they employ the top law firm in Calgary at taxpayer expense. So you cannot hire a better team to combat them.

People are blind.
Yeah Murray Edwards and CSEC are such a mom & pop operation. Support small business!
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:20 PM   #208
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
The City has a climate resiliency strategy, part of which includes ways in which buildings can reduce their environmental footprint. A lot of those measures are not mandatory, including rooftop solar. Here’s what happened here, since the rooftop is a large surface we asked if they could include rooftop solar. They said they could, but not as a condition of approval, could do if it was a condition of occupancy. This would allow the time to seek a potential partner. We said, ok, that’s reasonable. If they had said no, there is nothing in policy that could enable to us to force them, and we wouldn’t.
What does this mean? Flames will put solar if they feel like it? Someone kindly explain.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:21 PM   #209
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

I thought I would be pissed off.

But kinda idgaf anymore. It’s a weird feeling. If Murray is so proud and thinks the NHL will let him relocate the club, then honestly #### right off and good riddance.

I can watch pro sports on TV, and I can attend tons of amateur sports in Calgary as well. Plus there is pro soccer in Calgary and CFL (for a while anyway).
__________________
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:24 PM   #210
iloveicedhockey
First Line Centre
 
iloveicedhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Unless people in here are privy to the detailed contract information, which is probably under an iron clad NDC for the most part, the definitive rulings being made about who's at fault for the breakdown are utter nonsense.

Sad that it's broken down but this won't be the end of it. We all want a shiny new building but let's not pretend one side is holier than thou here.
iloveicedhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to iloveicedhockey For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:26 PM   #211
calgarywinning
First Line Centre
 
calgarywinning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iloveicedhockey View Post
Unless people in here are privy to the detailed contract information, which is probably under an iron clad NDC for the most part, the definitive rulings being made about who's at fault for the breakdown are utter nonsense.

Sad that it's broken down but this won't be the end of it. We all want a shiny new building but let's not pretend one side is holier than thou here.
Did you not see the Mayor on the news? How is that NDC and code of conduct for contract negotiation.
calgarywinning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:26 PM   #212
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I thought I would be pissed off.

But kinda idgaf anymore. It’s a weird feeling. If Murray is so proud and thinks the NHL will let him relocate the club, then honestly #### right off and good riddance.

I can watch pro sports on TV, and I can attend tons of amateur sports in Calgary as well. Plus there is pro soccer in Calgary and CFL (for a while anyway).
Stamps wouldn't survive without CSEC I think. CFL is drowning anyways.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:27 PM   #213
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Mayor's comments in her availability were so much clearer than her tweets.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:28 PM   #214
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp View Post
Thanks for the detail. What's the difference between a condition of approval and a condition of occupancy? Why would the Flames agree to one and not the other.
A condition of approval needs to be met prior to City recommending approval. For example, the panels would have to be reflected in the plan. Prior to release is another option, not required prior to approval, but prior to DP release has to be satisfied. Prior to occupancy means that nothing needs to be provided at time of approval or release, but when the City grants occupancy permits, the applicant will have to have satisfied the condition by then. This is a mechanism to buy time if the precise solution is not known at time of approval.

Edit: I’ll just note that Ryan Pike deleted his tweet about the agreement related to cost obligations. I understand referenced transportation costs were not related to the event management plan (City obligation).
__________________
Trust the snake.

Last edited by Bunk; 12-21-2021 at 08:30 PM.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:33 PM   #215
AFireInside
First Line Centre
 
AFireInside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy View Post
I like how those who consistently tell CSEC to f off (like White Out and others) assume the owners are moving forward without risk.

Who knows what the landscape will look like in Calgary post-pandemic given inflation, the downtown vacancy rate (actual near 50%) and a much changed energy sector? And on top of very little playoff success for this franchise.

Hell with 25 year plus STHs like me sitting out the season because of COVID and not sure I will even renew given the uncertainty regarding seat locations and sight lines in the new building (btw the Saddledome is excellent in that regard), the future of NHL hockey in this town is very suspect to begin with.
Running a business is a risk. No one is making them run it, and citizens shouldn't be on the hook for their business. They got way more than a fair deal from the city. Small businesses are taking risks, why aren't they getting nice deals from the city?
AFireInside is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to AFireInside For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:36 PM   #216
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Bye Bye Flames
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:38 PM   #217
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Could CP crowdfund ownership of the flames?? You guys want to own the team?
I have a PlayStation 5. Could I exchange that for the Flames?
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:39 PM   #218
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Bye Bye Flames

You understand that owners can’t just unilaterally decide to move their team, right?

The NHL has to let them.
__________________
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 08:40 PM   #219
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Could CP crowdfund ownership of the flames?? You guys want to own the team?

I've got some NFTs I can trade. Basically losing money on the deal, but that's how much I support the team.
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roughneck For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 08:40 PM   #220
calgarywinning
First Line Centre
 
calgarywinning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
A condition of approval needs to be met prior to City recommending approval. For example, the panels would have to be reflected in the plan. Prior to release is another option, not required prior to approval, but prior to DP release has to be satisfied. Prior to occupancy means that nothing needs to be provided at time of approval or release, but when the City grants occupancy permits, the applicant will have to have satisfied the condition by then. This is a mechanism to buy time if the precise solution is not known at time of approval.

Edit: I’ll just note that Ryan Pike deleted his tweet about the agreement related to cost obligations. I understand referenced transportation costs were not related to the event management plan (City obligation).
How can anything be built? We will find out.
calgarywinning is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
e=ng , edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy