Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-11-2021, 06:16 AM   #141
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra View Post
You did not respond to the top part of the post?

With Brodie he should have dealt with his contract situation in the summer. If he is not in your plans then move on and get some assets. A talented player like Brodie should have gotten you something good.

Waited too long and then the Flames were chasing a playoff spot so no trade.

Same thing with Johnny.
Should have dealt with him this summer.
If you are in the hunt for the playoffs this year at the trade deadline then according to you cannot trade him.

Tre gets second place in most trades.
Hate for him to lose Johhny in Free Agency as our offer will just miss out.

Do you want to potentially lose Johnny in Free Agency?
They did try to trade Brodie for Kadri.

Then being included in the trade made Brodie more inclined to go to UFA.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 06:37 AM   #142
Cobra
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Exp:
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach View Post
They did try to trade Brodie for Kadri.

Then being included in the trade made Brodie more inclined to go to UFA.
So once again Tre tried but failed to make a trade.

Alienated the player who then went to Free Agency and left.
This is doing a good job as GM?
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 06:44 AM   #143
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra View Post
You did not respond to the top part of the post?

With Brodie he should have dealt with his contract situation in the summer. If he is not in your plans then move on and get some assets. A talented player like Brodie should have gotten you something good.

Waited too long and then the Flames were chasing a playoff spot so no trade.

Same thing with Johnny.
Should have dealt with him this summer.
If you are in the hunt for the playoffs this year at the trade deadline then according to you cannot trade him.

Tre gets second place in most trades.
Hate for him to lose Johhny in Free Agency as our offer will just miss out.

Do you want to potentially lose Johnny in Free Agency?

Do any teams operate this way? Trading away every upcoming UFA even when they have a full season on their deal? You have to try and win some games at some point. There’s more to being a successful franchise than asset management
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 07:38 AM   #144
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra View Post
So once again Tre tried but failed to make a trade.

Alienated the player who then went to Free Agency and left.
This is doing a good job as GM?
Kadri turned down the trade because Calgary was on his no-trade list.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 08:11 AM   #145
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
Do any teams operate this way? Trading away every upcoming UFA even when they have a full season on their deal? You have to try and win some games at some point. There’s more to being a successful franchise than asset management

I doubt there is any team that trades away every UFA to be, especially those in contention.

Especially since in a cap world, even when one of your players leaves as a UFA, you clear that cap space, which may be just as valuable, especially if you are a sought after destination.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 08:38 AM   #146
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Kadri turned down the trade because Calgary was on his no-trade list.
No. He turned down the deal because he didn’t want to leave Toronto, and he could potentially avoid being traded.

The Flames still got Tanev with the cap space so what’s the big deal? If we were sitting with Brodie’s money in empty cap space then yeah Treliving isn’t doing his job, but that isn’t what is happening.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Boreal For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 08:40 AM   #147
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Kadri turned down the trade because Calgary was on his no-trade list.
Strategic play to stay in his hometown. Calgary was the most well known “need a centre” destinations in the league.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 09:35 AM   #148
Cobra
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Exp:
Icon48

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
Do any teams operate this way? Trading away every upcoming UFA even when they have a full season on their deal? You have to try and win some games at some point. There’s more to being a successful franchise than asset management
But we are not a successful franchise under Tre.

Yes you let some UFA walk....I agree with you.

But when you have a top 4 Defenceman and no realistic chance at playoff success or wanting to re-sign him then get a package to help in the future.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 11:48 AM   #149
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra View Post
But we are not a successful franchise under Tre.

Yes you let some UFA walk....I agree with you.

But when you have a top 4 Defenceman and no realistic chance at playoff success or wanting to re-sign him then get a package to help in the future.

Teams generally never admit they have no realistic chance in the playoffs. Exhibit A is last years Montreal Canadians.

And Calgary had a desire to re-sign Brodie.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 12:31 PM   #150
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobra View Post
But we are not a successful franchise under Tre.

Yes you let some UFA walk....I agree with you.

But when you have a top 4 Defenceman and no realistic chance at playoff success or wanting to re-sign him then get a package to help in the future.
They let Brodie walk because of his poor playoff performance.

He wasn't trusted late in games and we gave up a bunch of leads in the playoffs.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 12:39 PM   #151
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Now Brodie is overpaid and we have Tanev...seems like a win
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 12:41 PM   #152
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
They let Brodie walk because of his poor playoff performance.
They did not LET Brodie walk. He was a free agent and chose where he wanted to sign. That is what ‘free agent’ means. It seems to be a hard term for some hockey fans to grasp.

Unless, of course, you're one of those people who think the GM of the Calgary Flames has a mind-control ray that he can use to make players do his bidding. In that case, yes, Treliving was a complete idiot for not using it on Brodie.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 12:56 PM   #153
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
They did not LET Brodie walk. He was a free agent and chose where he wanted to sign. That is what ‘free agent’ means. It seems to be a hard term for some hockey fans to grasp.

Unless, of course, you're one of those people who think the GM of the Calgary Flames has a mind-control ray that he can use to make players do his bidding. In that case, yes, Treliving was a complete idiot for not using it on Brodie.
yes I think if Treliving would have offered Brodie that contract he would have signed.

They didn't want both of them

And on the flip side, Vancouver let Tanev walk and they are morons for it.

Last edited by DJones; 11-11-2021 at 12:59 PM.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 12:59 PM   #154
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
Do any teams operate this way? Trading away every upcoming UFA even when they have a full season on their deal? You have to try and win some games at some point. There’s more to being a successful franchise than asset management


Copied from another post of mine, in another thread:

Quote:
The obsession with "getting a return" for players is asinine and hilarious to me. Every player becomes a hot potato that you don't want to end up with, but somehow you have to bring yourself to ice a roster. I suppose it is inherently true that it is better to "sell high", but if you look at it from a reductionist point of view it becomes absurd.
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to timun For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 01:03 PM   #155
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
yes I think if Treliving would have offered Brodie that contract he would have signed.
If you overpay a player enough, he will nearly always sign. So what? Treliving replaced Brodie with a player who was better and cheaper, and the Leafs bought themselves another cap problem. How the hell is this a failure on Treliving's part?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 01:05 PM   #156
Knightslayer
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Exp:
Default

Brodie has played well in Toronto. Why are people calling him a "problem " he was +23 in 56 games last year and is providing solid D. Both Flames and Leafs happy. Doesn't have to be one or the other.
Knightslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knightslayer For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2021, 02:25 PM   #157
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
If you overpay a player enough, he will nearly always sign. So what? Treliving replaced Brodie with a player who was better and cheaper, and the Leafs bought themselves another cap problem. How the hell is this a failure on Treliving's part?
How did I say anything bad about Treliving? I said they could have signed Brodie and chose not too.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 02:29 PM   #158
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
How did I say anything bad about Treliving? I said they could have signed Brodie and chose not too.
I could be remembering this wrong, but I thought it was revealed that Treliving did offer Brodie an extension and he turned it down opting to become a free agent. Brodie knew that Toronto was interested in him after the failed Kadri was leaked.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 02:35 PM   #159
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Now Brodie is overpaid and we have Tanev...seems like a win
Brodie isn’t overpaid in Toronto, they’re paying him all of $400k more than we paid him. And he was never overpaid here.

Tanev + Kylington combine to bring what Brodie brought, and they can be in two places at once.


Everybody wins.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2021, 02:36 PM   #160
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I could be remembering this wrong, but I thought it was revealed that Treliving did offer Brodie an extension and he turned it down opting to become a free agent. Brodie knew that Toronto was interested in him after the failed Kadri was leaked.
An extension before UFA day? Nope. He said he hoped to re-sign him but he prioritized Markstrom.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flames , stanley cup , win


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy