Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-06-2021, 11:58 AM   #1021
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
But is it a reach, GioforPM?

Search within your soul. Knowing Treliving, Is it?
I think he’d be eager to divest himself of the Tkachuk headache. Mangiapane would be tougher. It’s still a risky trade.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 11:59 AM   #1022
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
All this talk about the Flames being idiots and morons based off of third/fourth hand knowledge has me wondering who the idiots really are.
Lol there’s the appeal to authority.

Do the Flames have Jack Eichel?

Was that a beatable package that acquired him?

I mean that’s kind of all you need to know, whether Tuch loves the Buffalo area or not- reality is that assets are assets.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:00 PM   #1023
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
That tweet doesn’t even come close to saying Treliving declared either Tkachuk or Mangiapane untouchable. It’s just some guy’s opinion about what might have happened. There’s no inside info there.
It’s just a quote from Friedman’s 32 thoughts podcast which I’m pretty sure has already been posted here.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:00 PM   #1024
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I think he’d be eager to divest himself of the Tkachuk headache. Mangiapane would be tougher. It’s still a risky trade.
And a risk worth taking.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:01 PM   #1025
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Lol there’s the appeal to authority.

Do the Flames have Jack Eichel?

Was that a beatable package that acquired him?
.
Perhaps not. Not if the Sabres considered Krebs the best prospect in either franchise.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:04 PM   #1026
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Lol there’s the appeal to authority.

Do the Flames have Jack Eichel?

Was that a beatable package that acquired him?

I mean that’s kind of all you need to know, whether Tuch loves the Buffalo area or not- reality is that assets are assets.
It's a matter of opinion

Tuch had more points than Mangipane or Monahan last season

They seem to have a Krebs boner
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:07 PM   #1027
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Lol there’s the appeal to authority.

Do the Flames have Jack Eichel?

Was that a beatable package that acquired him?

I mean that’s kind of all you need to know, whether Tuch loves the Buffalo area or not- reality is that assets are assets.
I suppose they could have offered two firsts, Coronato, Zary, and Lindholm.

Honestly, the only roster forwards clearly better than Tuch all things - including contract - considered is Lindholm. Gaudreau and Tkachuk are on expiring contracts and will probably not re-sign in Buffalo (Tkachuk after taking $9M of their money). Monahan is not a sure thing at all. Mangiapane and Tuch are quite similar in numbers but Mangiapane isn’t signed long term.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:12 PM   #1028
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
It's a matter of opinion

Tuch had more points than Mangipane or Monahan last season

They seem to have a Krebs boner
Not disagreeing, but just wanted to say Tuch had one more assist than Mangiapane. That much is well within the realm of standard deviation. I wouldn't be surprised if part of the reason he had that one more point was because the VGK led in more games thanks to Vezina-winning goaltending. Have a lead, other team is bound to make poor pinches or pull their goalie. Don't have a lead, and the other team is trapping you.

Will be interesting to see if Tuch and Mangiapane are in the same tier going forward. I'd wager Eatbread pulls ahead.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:16 PM   #1029
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Not disagreeing, but just wanted to say Tuch had one more assist than Mangiapane. That much is well within the realm of standard deviation. I wouldn't be surprised if part of the reason he had that one more point was because the VGK led in more games thanks to Vezina-winning goaltending. Have a lead, other team is bound to make poor pinches or pull their goalie. Don't have a lead, and the other team is trapping you.

Will be interesting to see if Tuch and Mangiapane are in the same tier going forward. I'd wager Eatbread pulls ahead.
I dunno - Tuch is gonna get premium ice time on that roster and maybe PP1, whereas Sutter rolls his lines and keeps Mangi on PP2. Tuch is similar to Mangiapane in that he’s succeeded down the lineup and without premium powerplay time. The guy has a lot of tools, size, speed and skill. And that contract is just fantastic.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:16 PM   #1030
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Not disagreeing, but just wanted to say Tuch had one more assist than Mangiapane. That much is well within the realm of standard deviation. I wouldn't be surprised if part of the reason he had that one more point was because the VGK led in more games thanks to Vezina-winning goaltending. Have a lead, other team is bound to make poor pinches or pull their goalie. Don't have a lead, and the other team is trapping you.

Will be interesting to see if Tuch and Mangiapane are in the same tier going forward. I'd wager Eatbread pulls ahead.
I think Mangi is better too...but it doesn't matter what I think

people are acting like he was a throw in though, he is around the same value and actually wants to be in Buffalo. That is rare
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2021, 12:18 PM   #1031
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
I think Mangi is better too...but it doesn't matter what I think

people are acting like he was a throw in though, he is around the same value and actually wants to be in Buffalo. That is rare
Yeah this - if you want a package that Buffalo can’t refuse over what they got you can’t say for sure Mangiapane + Zary > Tuch +Krebs. Despite what we think and what the numbers say on each side.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:19 PM   #1032
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Lol there’s the appeal to authority.

Do the Flames have Jack Eichel?

Was that a beatable package that acquired him?

I mean that’s kind of all you need to know, whether Tuch loves the Buffalo area or not- reality is that assets are assets.
That was Buffalo’s decision to make.

If your suggesting the Flames neuter themselves to acquire Eichel, then who knows what it would have taken.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:22 PM   #1033
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
It's a matter of opinion

Tuch had more points than Mangipane or Monahan last season

They seem to have a Krebs boner
Sure but my comments are only put forward if the Flames were refusing to put these guys on the table in the first place. The quote said these guys were not in play, “non-starters” etc. That’s ridiculous if true.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:23 PM   #1034
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I remember saying Tkachuk, Zary, 1st in the summer. It made it really tough to pull the trigger in season with such a core piece but too bad they didn’t make it happen over the summer time. This one still stings I am so disappointed Treliving didn’t overpay here. Huge risk with potential huge reward.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:26 PM   #1035
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I think Tuch is a very comparable asset to Mangiapane. The difference is that Mangianpane is much more consequential to the Flames than Tuch is to Vegas.

This team without Mangiapane for most of the season while waiting for Eichel to be game ready, probably has a much smaller shot at making the playoffs. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing for the long term future until you remember that Buffalo would have certainly been getting our 1st rounder as well.

Vegas is at a point right now where it doesn't even matter. They can afford to lose Tuch because they are rich in top line talent and their playoff hopes are more linked to their injury situation and not Tuch or Eichel.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:33 PM   #1036
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Sure but my comments are only put forward if the Flames were refusing to put these guys on the table in the first place. The quote said these guys were not in play, “non-starters” etc. That’s ridiculous if true.
That’s not really what the quote says. And I find it pretty hard to believe Treliving would not listen to a deal involving Tkachuk.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 12:59 PM   #1037
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

People are still forgetting that the Flames needed to move at least $6 mil in the deal. So let’s say the Sabres wanted Mangiapane, but they didn’t want Monahan (or a cap dump like Zadorov). Where does the other $4 mil in cap come from?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 01:04 PM   #1038
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
That’s not really what the quote says. And I find it pretty hard to believe Treliving would not listen to a deal involving Tkachuk.
"The other thing too is I think Buffalo asked about Tkachuk and I think they asked about Mangiapane and Calgary just wasn't willing to go there"

What does this mean to you (assuming it's true)?

Yes Cliff (and others), I understand the cap is a complication. Roger. Doesn't mean you can't figure something out.

There's always good reasons not to do something.

No first line C for 30 years.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 11-06-2021, 02:19 PM   #1039
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
"The other thing too is I think Buffalo asked about Tkachuk and I think they asked about Mangiapane and Calgary just wasn't willing to go there"

What does this mean to you (assuming it's true)?

Yes Cliff (and others), I understand the cap is a complication. Roger. Doesn't mean you can't figure something out.

There's always good reasons not to do something.

No first line C for 30 years.
Says to me that the Flames weren’t interested in trading Tkachuk or Mangiapane as part of a deal for Jack Eichel. Doesn’t mean the Flames wouldn’t listen for offers on those players otherwise.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2021, 02:21 PM   #1040
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Flames

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
"The other thing too is I think Buffalo asked about Tkachuk and I think they asked about Mangiapane and Calgary just wasn't willing to go there"

What does this mean to you (assuming it's true)?

Yes Cliff (and others), I understand the cap is a complication. Roger. Doesn't mean you can't figure something out.

There's always good reasons not to do something.

No first line C for 30 years.
End of the day the same problem with all this still exists. Buffalo has to say yes. And by all accounts had a Cialis level of hard on for Krebs which simply over rides any offer the Flames could have comfortably (or uncomfortably) offered up.

You can Blame the Flames management all you want, they still can't make the other team agree to a deal.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy