Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-08-2021, 12:45 AM   #2761
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Just heard Hoven's interview. Also says Ducks ownership is patient and knows their rebuild will probably last two/three more years. They remain very interested in Eichel and will circle back when the asking price comes down. Have no interest in including Drysdale, Zegras, or McTavish.

So they were offering Gibson and maybe one of Steel, Terry, or Jones? I doubt they would include Comtois.

Still think Eichel doesn't make much sense for the Ducks. Young players still early in their development, Eakins is still coach, and if they were trying to make a hockey trade that probably means they don't want to give up their 1st round pick or prospects. Gibson out, Eichel in seems like a lateral move at best. Changing their offer to include prospects and a likely high pick seems like a waste for a team still rebuilding. I also think Buffalo will always look at Drysdale, Zegras, and McTavish and demand that one of them has to be in the offer.

Other rumored offers I've seen out there:
Vegas: Smith, Krebs, Hague, 1st
NYR: Georgiev, Kravtsov, Jones, 1st


Not great offers out there.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 12:49 AM   #2762
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Boucher IMO is an excellent prospect-he might not make it as a first-liner, but he'll be an impact player in the league. He's big, he can skate, and he's uber mean and physical-he can impact the game in many ways, and he has some offensive skill. Some players get 2-3 hits in a game, but Boucher can get that often in one shift. That said, I would not have taken him 10th overall as the Sens did. I think they really loved this kid, and they knew he wouldn't make it past the late first/ early second. I like the team they are building though-big, mean, and fast.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 05:55 AM   #2763
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

The Sens have drafted better than the Flames so I would not laugh at their drafting as a Flames fan
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2021, 06:00 AM   #2764
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
The Sens have drafted better than the Flames so I would not laugh at their drafting as a Flames fan

Have they? They committed to a rebuild and acquired a ton of picks, but most of the big prospect writers come away after every draft saying Ottawa dropped the ball
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2021, 06:12 AM   #2765
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
The Sens have drafted better than the Flames so I would not laugh at their drafting as a Flames fan
They have? How do you qualify this? How long have they been drafting better than the Flames? I don’t think your comment means much. In what context are you making this statement?

Of course the Sens have drafted better, look where they are drafting. Selling off assets (Stone, Karlson) to bottom out, start a rebuild, and then picking high in the first round for multiple years is the easiest time a GM will have.

@bax, beat me to it

Last edited by TOfan; 09-08-2021 at 06:21 AM.
TOfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 06:35 AM   #2766
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
They remain very interested in Eichel and will circle back when the asking price comes down. Have no interest in including Drysdale, Zegras, or McTavish.
I just don't see the asking price dropping that much as if they aren't going to include one of those players I can't ever see negotiations going very far.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 06:43 AM   #2767
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

The Ducks trading for Eichel made little sense but including Gibson in the deal makes even less. I would assume getting Eichel they would want their goalie who can steal games helping accelerate their performance
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 07:51 AM   #2768
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
The Ducks trading for Eichel made little sense but including Gibson in the deal makes even less. I would assume getting Eichel they would want their goalie who can steal games helping accelerate their performance

Exactly. Trading Gibson only makes sense if the ducks are trying to bottom out in a rebuild since a good goalie can steal games during the season - hurting your chances at a high pick. And if the ducks are acquiring eichel… they would have to include their first round pick. So Gibson for eichel does not make sense for the ducks. Also, Buffalo is going after finishing dead last this season… Gibson is probably the worst player to trade for if you want to do that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 07:56 AM   #2769
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

If it’s true Gibson is available snd he isn’t used to get eichel, I could see Anaheim getting a king’s ransom for him from teams like Carolina or Edmonton if their goalie experiments start to let them down early in the season. Those teams will be desperate if things go off the rails early.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:01 AM   #2770
Knightslayer
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Exp:
Default

If I'm Edmonton I'm calling and offering whatever they want not named McDavid and Draisatl.
Knightslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:05 AM   #2771
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Gibson is probably only available for Eichel
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:07 AM   #2772
Knightslayer
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
Gibson is probably only available for Eichel
That would be ridiculous on Anaheim's part. Plenty of great packages can be had for Gibson. Don't know why they'd only want Eichel or nothing.

Besides, don't think Eichel moves the needle much for them. They're at least 3 to 5 years away from being competitive.
Knightslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:13 AM   #2773
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I realize the Ducks have been a bad team over the past few seasons but Gibson's save percentage has nosedived over the past few seasons to below average. He's was a mirror image to David Rittich last season and that's not where you want to be.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:14 AM   #2774
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
Just heard Hoven's interview. Also says Ducks ownership is patient and knows their rebuild will probably last two/three more years. They remain very interested in Eichel and will circle back when the asking price comes down. Have no interest in including Drysdale, Zegras, or McTavish.

So they were offering Gibson and maybe one of Steel, Terry, or Jones? I doubt they would include Comtois.

Still think Eichel doesn't make much sense for the Ducks. Young players still early in their development, Eakins is still coach, and if they were trying to make a hockey trade that probably means they don't want to give up their 1st round pick or prospects. Gibson out, Eichel in seems like a lateral move at best. Changing their offer to include prospects and a likely high pick seems like a waste for a team still rebuilding. I also think Buffalo will always look at Drysdale, Zegras, and McTavish and demand that one of them has to be in the offer.

Other rumored offers I've seen out there:
Vegas: Smith, Krebs, Hague, 1st
NYR: Georgiev, Kravtsov, Jones, 1st


Not great offers out there.
I agree, if those are the type of offers that the Sabres have been offered I am not surprised at all that this is dragging on.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:16 AM   #2775
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
Boucher IMO is an excellent prospect-he might not make it as a first-liner, but he'll be an impact player in the league. He's big, he can skate, and he's uber mean and physical-he can impact the game in many ways, and he has some offensive skill. Some players get 2-3 hits in a game, but Boucher can get that often in one shift. That said, I would not have taken him 10th overall as the Sens did. I think they really loved this kid, and they knew he wouldn't make it past the late first/ early second. I like the team they are building though-big, mean, and fast.
That's a fair summary. I think they think they are getting their Tom Wilson. I just see him as a bottom 6 forward, and not great value for that spot.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2021, 08:33 AM   #2776
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
That's a fair summary. I think they think they are getting their Tom Wilson. I just see him as a bottom 6 forward, and not great value for that spot.

As much as I hate Tom Wilson, I think in a redraft he would go first round, and it Boucher turns out that way, the Sens will be thrilled. Not that I think it was a good pick. Their whole draft was kind of iffy.


As for Gibson, his last 2 seasons have been sub-par. Not sure the idea of trading him is all that outlandish.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:37 AM   #2777
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

So Ducks are holding out on the "hockey trade" for Eichel.

Rangers have the prospects and young guns Sabers want but they won't deal the Rangers.

Flames if I had to guess are on the "hockey trade" side of things too. Almost too much like the ducks where they'd be too hesitant to offer up their best prospects.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:41 AM   #2778
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
So Ducks are holding out on the "hockey trade" for Eichel.

Rangers have the prospects and young guns Sabers want but they won't deal the Rangers.

Flames if I had to guess are on the "hockey trade" side of things too. Almost too much like the ducks where they'd be too hesitant to offer up their best prospects.
The difference between the Ducks top prospects and ours is significant. If BT is hesitant to give up any of our top prospects in a trade for a top 5 young C in the NHL he is not doing his job.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2021, 08:54 AM   #2779
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
The difference between the Ducks top prospects and ours is significant. If BT is hesitant to give up any of our top prospects in a trade for a top 5 young C in the NHL he is not doing his job.

Yeah. My assumption is that Brad has included top prospect(s) in the offer. In fact, I would not be surprised if the flames’ offer is the closest to what Buffalo is asking for (equivalent of four first round picks) but Buffalo is holding out for better prospects from other teams and for less/no protections on first round picks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-08-2021, 08:55 AM   #2780
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
As much as I hate Tom Wilson, I think in a redraft he would go first round, and it Boucher turns out that way, the Sens will be thrilled. Not that I think it was a good pick. Their whole draft was kind of iffy.


As for Gibson, his last 2 seasons have been sub-par. Not sure the idea of trading him is all that outlandish.

Tom Wilson did go in the first round. 16th overall.

Wilson is a legitimately great top six forward in addition to all the physical stuff. 33 points in 47 games last year.

Boucher has a very long way to go to get there.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy