Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2021, 09:41 PM   #41
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
No, but short term deals don't go for way less cap hit any more.

Why would he take 3 years at $6M when these guys are getting $9.5M? He would need $11.5M for the next 5 years just to break even.
Yeah, look at Tkachuk. $7M for 3 years.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2021, 09:41 PM   #42
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Well, this is also his first RFA deal. When Werenski came off his ELC he signed for 3x5.9, and that wasn't in a flat cap environment.

I honestly have no idea what anyone's going to sign for. But he's right that Hughes has no leverage. If the Canucks went into the season without him, how much worse would their defense even be? It's going to be really, really bad regardless... might as well squeeze a good deal out of him; he's going to New Jersey eventually.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2021, 10:01 PM   #43
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

BJs lost all leverage after the Jones contract. Would have been an easy negotiation for Werenski's agent to say he's better than Jones so deserves more money.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FireGilbert For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2021, 10:10 PM   #44
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
So the GMs don’t know the cap is flat
There’s still a floor to hit, and Columbus couldn’t really afford to let ANOTHER talented player walk out the door.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2021, 10:15 PM   #45
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireGilbert View Post
BJs lost all leverage after the Jones contract. Would have been an easy negotiation for Werenski's agent to say he's better than Jones so deserves more money.
Yeah, they kept him over Jones - hard to then not ay him more than what Jones got. "we like you better, but we're not paying you as much"
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2021, 10:19 PM   #46
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Yeah, they kept him over Jones - hard to then not ay him more than what Jones got. "we like you better, but we're not paying you as much"

But Jones made it clear that he wasn't going to sign. So it wasn't necessarily a truism that they liked Werenski more, although that's certainly possible.


And after the exodus out of Columbus, from Panarin and Bobrovsky, to Jones, to Dubois, the Blue Jackets needed to keep someone. Werenski's agent clearly knew that.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2021, 11:23 PM   #47
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

CBJ has never really had any bad contracts on the books that I can recall.

Now this and Voracek are higher AAVs, but not necessarily awful.

I don't this deal will ever be the thing that holds them back.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2021, 11:40 PM   #48
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

[MOD EDIT] Gross.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl

Last edited by Textcritic; 07-30-2021 at 09:07 AM.
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2021, 11:45 PM   #49
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
[MOD EDIT] Gross.
Um what
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno

Last edited by Textcritic; 07-30-2021 at 09:08 AM.
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2021, 12:03 AM   #50
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
No, but short term deals don't go for way less cap hit any more.

Why would he take 3 years at $6M when these guys are getting $9.5M? He would need $11.5M for the next 5 years just to break even.
McAvoy was 4.9m
Werenski was 5m

One of the agents they asked, anonymously answered, also said sergachev at 4.8m was a comparable Canucks could use

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Yeah, look at Tkachuk. $7M for 3 years.
The forwards on bridge deals pay has gone way up the last few years, but defensemen haven't

I think it's in hughes best interest to sign a short bridge anyway, if canucks are offering 3 years he should ask for 2. Then sign a longer term deal
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 12:04 AM   #51
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Jeezus, NHL GM's just can't help themselves.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 12:22 AM   #52
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

https://thecanuckway.com/2021/04/13/...-and-hughes/3/

This writer predicts a bridge too. At over $7M.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 12:24 AM   #53
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
https://thecanuckway.com/2021/04/13/...-and-hughes/3/

This writer predicts a bridge too. At over $7M.
Yeah, I would expect a bridge deal, but it is going to be more like $7.5, as this person suggests, not $6.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 03:29 AM   #54
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
I think Werenski is a great defenseman but that is one spicy contract.
!00% worth the contract just to look him up and see his dirty stankin' dirt bag 'stache.

Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 05:59 AM   #55
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Good deal for both sides. Werenski is gonna take another step.
Jarmo is doing really well with re-shaping this team. Columbus guys don't screw around; Dubois wants out? gone for two very good pieces. Jones not re-signing? trade him for a haul. Have money? sign your franchise D to a fair contract.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 07:55 AM   #56
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_phaneuf View Post

I think it's in hughes best interest to sign a short bridge anyway, if canucks are offering 3 years he should ask for 2. Then sign a longer term deal
A lot of factors to consider, but IMO bridge makes more sense when you're on a good team and/or your upside exceeds your downside. I'm not sure either are the case for Hughes.

Obviously speculative numbers (and ignores things like escrow or SB), starting at age 21:

A. 8x9M; (age 29) then 7x8M takes you to 36 = $128M
a lot of risk that you'll still be worth the big deal in 8 years

B. 6x8M; (27) then 7x9M takes you to 34 = $111M
gets you to location control soonest

C. 3x7M; (24)then 8x10M gets you to age 32 = $101M
betting on yourself to get good contracts in your 30s, or you have to go shorter on you first "big" deal to open a better 2nd good UFA window (lots of risk). Though a 3rd year high QO could play out well

D. 2x6M; (23) then 5x9M; (28) then 7x8M takes you to 35 = $113M
a lot of variables, but also opportunities to adapt


Option B seems most appealing to me, but obviously everyone values things differently. Then again, I'm sure Point and Tkachuk have no regrets for taking option C
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 08:08 AM   #57
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Good deal for both sides. Werenski is gonna take another step.
Jarmo is doing really well with re-shaping this team. Columbus guys don't screw around; Dubois wants out? gone for two very good pieces. Jones not re-signing? trade him for a haul. Have money? sign your franchise D to a fair contract.
That’s an opinion.

Mine is that this is encroaching on the worst contract in the NHL. If you were to list the best dmen, too 5, 10, hell… 20? Would this guy crack any of those lists? Because he’s being paid like it.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 08:16 AM   #58
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
That’s an opinion.

Mine is that this is encroaching on the worst contract in the NHL. If you were to list the best dmen, too 5, 10, hell… 20? Would this guy crack any of those lists? Because he’s being paid like it.
He can be top 10, maybe 5
One of the best young dmen but yeah this is at least 1M overpaid
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 08:18 AM   #59
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Who cares about the money? They have to pay someone.

I am happy for Blue Jacket fans. It would be been even more demoralizing to see someone else go.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2021, 08:18 AM   #60
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Top 20 maybe... but reputation isn't really a factor. It's probably going to wind up being better than Jones's deal simply because of the term and their respective ages and the trend of their play. Jones' play was declining a bit, and then completely cratered last season.



__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy