Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-05-2007, 02:18 PM   #1
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default Bad News for Internet Radio (US)

http://www.kurthanson.com/archive/ne...07/index.shtml

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) has announced its decision on Internet radio royalty rates, rejecting all of the arguments made by Webcasters and instead adopting the "per play" rate proposal put forth by SoundExchange(a digital music fee collection body created by the RIAA).

Radio Paradise's Bill Goldsmith notes, "This royalty structure would wipe out an entire class of business: Small independent webcasters such as myself & my wife, who operate Radio Paradise. Our obligation under this rate structure would be equal to over 125% of our total income. There is no practical way for us to increase our income so dramatically as to render that affordable."

Although this is undeniably a huge victory for the legal departments of record labels (or at least for the lawyers at their industry trade association, the RIAA), I doubt that the heads of the record labels and their marketing executives actually want to see Internet radio driven out of business. (This may be a case of "Be careful what you wish for, you may get it.")

Last summer, there were rumors of seemingly productive negotiations going on between Sound Exchange and webcasters regarding a voluntary (i.e., not statuatory) percentage-of-revenues royalty rate. Everyone's best hope, I believe — for webcasters, labels, musicians, and consumers alike — would be if those negotiations could resume.



troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 02:36 PM   #2
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Heck of a way to kill a low budget/low revenue industry.

This will remove a lot of stations that would cater to niche markets. I'm guessing that this will hurt sales for newer acts.

I wonder if many of these stations may migrate out of the US? Perhaps an opportunity here created by short-sightedness? A lot of internet radio listeners will be looking for replacement internet stations.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 02:38 PM   #3
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

RP had a funding drive last month and last I saw they were about 50% target on the last day.
DuffMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 02:58 PM   #4
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Do I ever hate everything about the RIAA and MPAA. I'd imagine non-RIAA labels will not be subject to this.

If everything works out well in the universe, there will be a whole infrastructure dedicated to non-RIAA bands, including sites selling non-drm music, and internet radio stations paying non-RIAA bands a fair royalty. Who knows, the artists themselves may actually make more money when the obsolete labels are not involved.

Hopefully, one day the only "artists" represented by RIAA are American Idol graduates, and Britney/Nickelback wannabes.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 03:01 PM   #5
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
Do I ever hate everything about the RIAA and MPAA. I'd imagine non-RIAA labels will not be subject to this.

If everything works out well in the universe, there will be a whole infrastructure dedicated to non-RIAA bands, including sites selling non-drm music, and internet radio stations paying non-RIAA bands a fair royalty. Who knows, the artists themselves may actually make more money when the obsolete labels are not involved.

Hopefully, one day the only "artists" represented by RIAA are American Idol graduates, and Britney/Nickelback wannabes.
I think this will apply to everything. It isn't the RIAA who are deciding this, it is just the RIAA's recommendation that has been used.

The decision came from a sub-committee of the Library of Congress.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 03:59 PM   #6
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

I'm waiting for my RockRap email to come out about this. I wonder how this is going to affect places like MySpace. I think that is RIAA's big fish.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:48 PM   #7
blayn
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Default

wow that sucks, i love finding new bands that way, i doubt myspace will go down without putting up a big fight
blayn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 08:08 AM   #8
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

On the other side of things, anyone try the music site Amie Street?

Artists upload their music (DRM free), and the music is initally free to download. But as downloads increase (and is there for "popular") the price automatically begins to increase. The maximum price for a song is 98 cents (US$).

It sounds like an interesting concept.


(BTW, the site just made the front page of Digg.com and, as a result, is getting hammered with traffic right now)
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 08:20 AM   #9
ericschand
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blayn View Post
wow that sucks, i love finding new bands that way, ....
And that's the whole point. If you can find bands/music that way, then
you will not buy the advertised-overly-hyped music from the RIAA members.
So, RIAA makes it tough for you to find other avenues for music, they
gain because other competition is gone.

ers
ericschand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 10:20 AM   #10
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I wonder if this has anything to do with XM Canada's decision to increase service charges by 8$/year by September 2008.

On the XM boards its labeled as an Internet radio price hike yet you cannot opt out of being able to listen online.

MYK
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 10:25 AM   #11
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
I wonder if this has anything to do with XM Canada's decision to increase service charges by 8$/year by September 2008.

On the XM boards its labeled as an Internet radio price hike yet you cannot opt out of being able to listen online.

MYK

I'm not sure. I know the new fees do NOT apply to terrestrial radio stations that stream their signal on the net, but I don't know what category XM falls into.

But this is a US fee, Canadian web casts are not affected by this (other than the impending American pressure on the Cdn gov't to adopt similar rules).
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 11:28 AM   #12
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Bill Goldsmith from Radio Paradise wrote a good article on this, and it is posted here.

PS
His wife looks like Edie Brickell's younger sister.
DuffMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 01:22 PM   #13
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan View Post
Bill Goldsmith from Radio Paradise wrote a good article on this, and it is posted here.

PS
His wife looks like Edie Brickell's younger sister.
Is Edie Brickwell's younger sister a coke addict dating a much slimmer Santa Clause

MYK
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 12:33 PM   #14
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

New hope for internet radio:

http://www3.capwiz.com/saveinternetr...679516&type=TA

There is a bill just introduced in Congress that will save Internet radio from the devastating royalty fee increases that will put thousands of Internet webcasters out of business on May 15th. Please call your Representative in Congress as soon as possible and urge them to co-sponsor H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 03:21 PM   #15
Titan
First Line Centre
 
Titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Is Edie Brickwell's younger sister a coke addict dating a much slimmer Santa Clause

MYK
Or THE santa clause. (unless of course you were actually refering to Tim Allen in your post and in that case I think he was a coke seller not a coke addict? May be wrong)

Also I was going to say that saying someone looks like Edie Brickell is a guarantee to get click throughs!! At least i think she is nummy!!
Titan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 07:51 PM   #16
La Flames Fan
THE Chuck Storm
 
La Flames Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Diaf Riaa.
__________________
Mediapop Films
La Flames Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy