Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2021, 04:29 PM   #101
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
It’s also made harder by the fact he is likely not on the trade market.

In any event, assuming he is traded, the likely winning bidder will include a premium piece that is young, relatively cheap and with term. Calgary does not have that piece.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Tkachuk, Monahan, Zary, 1st.

Four 1st round picks - two Bonafide NHL players with leadership, a fine centre prospect and a lottery ticket.

We get a #1C under contract through his prime for 5 years.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 04:39 PM   #102
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Tkachuk, Monahan, Zary, 1st.

Four 1st round picks - two Bonafide NHL players with leadership, a fine centre prospect and a lottery ticket.

We get a #1C under contract through his prime for 5 years.

That’s a decent offer for sure. But “leadership”?

I think Calgary’s biggest problem is their complete lack of leadership on the ice. I don’t think Monny has any leadership qualities. Tkachuk might eventually. But it’s hard for us outsiders to really know.

I expect t that the player that Buffalo would insist be part of the package is Lindholm. Based on his contract and skills.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 05:23 PM   #103
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I suspect they will much rather have a D than Bennett. One of Hanifin, Valimaki or Andersson.
I think Valimaki will still be a good player, but he would be my pick.

I think Hanifin is entering a new level and Andersson still has sky high potential despite a rough season defensively.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 05:25 PM   #104
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
You either have to go for Eichel or scorch the team for Wright or Bedard. Those are all top end centers that the Flames desperately need.

With Sutter at helm, our option is to go for someone like Eichel or go for a three way trade with Buffalo and New York, where we acquire Zibanejad (or some crazy trade like that). But, those trades don't happen in the NHL, so we revert back to Eichel.

Buffalo is a tire fire, and arguably a worse run organization than the Oilers. Yes, the organization up north is actually doing slightly better than Buffalo. We haven't seen Jack's potential. It's been him without much help. I suppose you can say that he has had help, and also pieces that SHOULD be helping him, but they aren't. We have better ownership, better GM, and now better coaching. And I would argue that we would have a better supporting cast. I don't think Jack is fit to be captain of our team, but we would emphasize that he is our key to getting success beyond the regular season. He hasn't had that chance yet, you bet your ass he would be fired up. He also didn't like getting picked after McDavid in the 2015 draft, I'm sure he would love to play his best every time went up against Edmonton.

Monahan for sure would have to be traded, and it would either have to be Gaudreau or Tkachuk also going the other way. I think with the direction of this team under coach Sutter, I would be more comfortable keeping Tkachuk over Gaudreau, as I think Tkachuk's style fits more of what Sutter wants from this team. Gaudreau wouldn't extend in Buffalo, so I think we'd have to find another suitor who would take him. Philadelphia is the ideal choice.

To Calgary: Eichel, Okposo @ 50% retention
To Buffalo: Monahan, Gostisbehere, Frost, JVR, 2021/22 1st (CGY), 2022 1st (PHI), Patrick
To Philadelphia: Gaudreau, Ristolainen

Basically comes down to: Monahan, Gaudreau, and 2021 1st for Eichel and Okposo (50% retained),

Then Philly trading for Gaudreau and Ristolainen in exchange for JVR, Ghost, 2021 1st, Patrick, Frost

Like I said, three way trades are rare. I think if I am Buffalo I ask for Tkachuk and Monahan, and if that were to happen then I hope we try to land Reinhart and Eichel and add to Tkachuk and Monahan.
PHI is giving up an insane amount there for 1.25 seasons of JG and RR.

Okposo also has a 15 team NTC. I'm sure at this point he'd waive for most places, but if BUF is trading away Eichel then his 2 more years of bad money don't really matter to them (and his buyout wouldn't be that bad).

I do agree that any chance CGY has at Eichel would likely involve a 3rd team. Unless maybe we did Lindholm+Andersson+. I think they'd have zero interest in SM, JG, or MT given their contract terms.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 05:43 PM   #105
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky View Post
Eichel is a game changer. Can you imagine him playing with Gaudreau or Tkachuk on his wing?
Gotta start with Monahan, I think. I'd add Hanifin and Zary plus a 1st. Maybe a defenseman like Miller comes back to even things out.
Would love it to be Monahan but I suspect they know what we know

I would be ok with Lindholm and moving Monahan elsewhere.

Lindholm, Hanifin, top prospect and a 1st

for

Eichel and a 2nd
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 05:44 PM   #106
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
PHI is giving up an insane amount there for 1.25 seasons of JG and RR.

Okposo also has a 15 team NTC. I'm sure at this point he'd waive for most places, but if BUF is trading away Eichel then his 2 more years of bad money don't really matter to them (and his buyout wouldn't be that bad).

I do agree that any chance CGY has at Eichel would likely involve a 3rd team. Unless maybe we did Lindholm+Andersson+. I think they'd have zero interest in SM, JG, or MT given their contract terms.
How do you figure that is 1 25 seasons of Gaudreau? Is there any doubt whatsoever he would re-sign there? Like none.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 07:01 PM   #107
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

If it's that certain, they might as well wait a year and get him for nothing but cash.

The Flyers would still need to decide they 100% want him, and they would both have to agree to terms.

2022 is an insane UFA year (including their own Couturier and Giroux), and PHI can be in on whoever they want (that makes it to UFA, which certainly won't be all of even most of the following):

Barkov
Zibanejad
F Forsberg
Hertl
Gaudreau
Malkin
Bergeron

(even decent options a step or two down; non comprehensive):
Kadri
Kessel
R Strome
Burakovsky
Trocheck
Domi


Seth Jones
Pulock
Ekholm
Nurse
Letang
Rielly
Klingberg
Parayko
H Lindholm
Ristolainen
Subban


If I'm PHI, I'm waiting for the ED to play out and keeping maximum flexibility. I'd only move those assets out to guarantee I get Seth Jones (or maybe Pulock/Parayko) - solving the biggest need.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 07:07 PM   #108
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
This is complete bs. Monahan does not play defense. Johnny actually backchecks more than Monahan. The Monahan apologists need to stop fabricating this supposed 200 foot game that is entirely non existent. I have not seen anything you claim from the above, just a slow soft perimeter player who is a liability when he isn't scoring.
I don't know about Johnny back checking more but it is complete BS that Sean has this stellar 200 foot game. He's still hands it off to opposition, he still seems to come off worse in any physical encounter. Honestly if "improved" from nothing is the basis for a 1st or hell a 2nd line C we're in trouble.
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flame On For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 07:13 PM   #109
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
PHI is giving up an insane amount there for 1.25 seasons of JG and RR.

Okposo also has a 15 team NTC. I'm sure at this point he'd waive for most places, but if BUF is trading away Eichel then his 2 more years of bad money don't really matter to them (and his buyout wouldn't be that bad).

I do agree that any chance CGY has at Eichel would likely involve a 3rd team. Unless maybe we did Lindholm+Andersson+. I think they'd have zero interest in SM, JG, or MT given their contract terms.
I probably should have clarified that this would be an offseason trade. And the Flyers aren't just acquiring Johnny, they're also acquiring Ristolainen from Buffalo. Patrick needs a change of scenery, Frost is still a question mark.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 07:16 PM   #110
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post

Monahan had a 2 goal game, but aside from that he's done other things than score, especially in the zone Sutter cares the most about. Well enough that Sutter's put him on some PKs. 17 SOG as well. 9 hits (Lindholm had 7, Backlund had 5).

Tell me what Gaudreau has done that should impress a guy like Sutter. 1 goal (when getting blown out) and no assists. 7 SOG. No hits obviously.
Monahan has 17 shots on goal and Gaudreau has no assists.
Connect the dots here please....

Monahan isn't creating those 17 shots by himself.
Gaudreau can't get an assist when his linemates can't finish.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 08:51 PM   #111
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame On View Post
I don't know about Johnny back checking more but it is complete BS that Sean has this stellar 200 foot game. He's still hands it off to opposition, he still seems to come off worse in any physical encounter. Honestly if "improved" from nothing is the basis for a 1st or hell a 2nd line C we're in trouble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Monahan has 17 shots on goal and Gaudreau has no assists.
Connect the dots here please....

Monahan isn't creating those 17 shots by himself.
Gaudreau can't get an assist when his linemates can't finish.
You both are missing the point, and misquoting me as well. I said Sutter probably is liking Monahan’s game more right now than Gaudreau’s and I stick with that, based on what I said. Maybe you have some data to contradict it.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 10:05 PM   #112
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
You both are missing the point, and misquoting me as well. I said Sutter probably is liking Monahan’s game more right now than Gaudreau’s and I stick with that, based on what I said. Maybe you have some data to contradict it.
I'm simply pointing out your interpretation of your own data is flawed.
Monahan has 17 shots largely because he plays with Gaudreau.
Gaudreau has zero assists largely because he passes to Monahan & Ritchie.

If Sutter is happy with Monahan's 17 shots, he'll also be happy with the guy who sets up 95% if those shots.

If he's unhappy with Gaudreau's zero assists, he'll also be unhappy with the guys who can't finish any of his setups.

Sutter is likely happy or unhappy with both Monahan & Gaudreau. He'd understand the interconnectedness of this data.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 10:21 PM   #113
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 10:28 PM   #114
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
I'm simply pointing out your interpretation of your own data is flawed.
Monahan has 17 shots largely because he plays with Gaudreau.
Gaudreau has zero assists largely because he passes to Monahan & Ritchie.

If Sutter is happy with Monahan's 17 shots, he'll also be happy with the guy who sets up 95% if those shots.

If he's unhappy with Gaudreau's zero assists, he'll also be unhappy with the guys who can't finish any of his setups.

Sutter is likely happy or unhappy with both Monahan & Gaudreau. He'd understand the interconnectedness of this data.
Monahan has 2 goals. Gaudreau assisted on neither. And the point is that Sutter is defence first, and he seems happy enough with Monahan in his own zone to give him faceoffs there, and, more importantly, put him on PK. Anyone not noticing Monahan’s defensive effort these days is simply ignoring it.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 11:15 PM   #115
Flame On
Franchise Player
 
Flame On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Monahan has 2 goals. Gaudreau assisted on neither. And the point is that Sutter is defence first, and he seems happy enough with Monahan in his own zone to give him faceoffs there, and, more importantly, put him on PK. Anyone not noticing Monahan’s defensive effort these days is simply ignoring it.
Wrong I simply disagree with your observation entirely. I see him overwhelmed making decisions and turning the puck over, not winning battles, certainly not physical ones. Your argument seems to be "he tries" and I don't think that's good enough.
__________________
Canuck insulter and proud of it.
Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)
Don't insult other members; even if they are Canuck fans.
Flame On is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 11:25 PM   #116
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flame On View Post
Wrong I simply disagree with your observation entirely. I see him overwhelmed making decisions and turning the puck over, not winning battles, certainly not physical ones. Your argument seems to be "he tries" and I don't think that's good enough.
He arguably had one turnover in the D zone last game, but it was more on the D and Ritchie. But he won a fair number of puck battles, stopped a number of plays in the D and NZs, covered for pinching D, and normally got the puck out, only to see Gaudreau pass to Ritchie up ice, who then lost it.

My argument is that Sutter likes him in the D zone. And my argument is that he likely likes his game a lot more than what he’s seen out of Johnny.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-22-2021, 02:52 AM   #117
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Until we get Eichel I think Sutter needs a sit down meeting with Monahan and Gaudreau with a clip show when they played their best, Give them Mangiapane at RW who can somewhat replace the skill of Hudler with the forechecking and puck retrieval needed.

Ritchie isn't as bad as I thought but lets face it he has the vision of a bat and is a 3rd/4th liner.

Last edited by Snuffleupagus; 03-22-2021 at 02:54 AM.
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2021, 02:59 AM   #118
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Monahan is not a power guy, he doesn't crash and bang, and generally doesn't grind it out like a Mike Peca. This makes him a lot less noticeable, but there's more to good defense than those things. Mony plays a pretty sound positional defensive game-he takes away passes and shots with his positioning, and his stick. When he gets possession, the puck goes the other way. He'll probably never win a Selke, but he's fine. Jere Lehtinen, and Joe Nieuwendyk were examples of players that were great defensively, but a bit soft physically. And if there's any doubt, look at his ice time under Sutter.

And I'm not a huge Mony fan, I've argued before about my belief that we could use an upgrade at C.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 03-22-2021, 04:51 AM   #119
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Monahan has 17 shots on goal and Gaudreau has no assists.
Connect the dots here please....

Monahan isn't creating those 17 shots by himself.
Gaudreau can't get an assist when his linemates can't finish.
I don't disagree, because Monahan has looked largely useless. But Gaudreau has been pretty terrible lately even when it comes to his passing.

I just went through last game to pull the few highlights (Tanev mostly) and these 2 botched passes by Gaudreau to Monahan stood out, knee and chest high:

Link

Link

The pair's ineffectiveness is definitely a result of both players struggling, compounded by having a 4th liner on their wing.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 03-22-2021, 08:12 AM   #120
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
I don't disagree, because Monahan has looked largely useless. But Gaudreau has been pretty terrible lately even when it comes to his passing.

I just went through last game to pull the few highlights (Tanev mostly) and these 2 botched passes by Gaudreau to Monahan stood out, knee and chest high:
..

The pair's ineffectiveness is definitely a result of both players struggling, compounded by having a 4th liner on their wing.

The first one, you could see Monny in a good place, stick on the ice giving Johnny a target. Backhand sauce by Johnny missed by a bit for sure, not great, and Monny couldn’t knock it down

The second one I recall watching and thought Mikheyev got a stick on it. Tough to tell from the replay
DeluxeMoustache is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy