Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2007, 08:03 AM   #1
I_H8_Crawford
Franchise Player
 
I_H8_Crawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Does Pearson seriously charge $20 for improvement fees?

That airport is TERRIBLE. They have no decent restaurants, nowhere to really wait past security, and have nowhere in the general terminal either. (Terminal 1)

At least Calgary has places like montana's and chilis on the premises.

I hate Pearson.
I_H8_Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 08:32 AM   #2
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Fotze, I wasn't very good at math in school but $5 -> $20 seems more than 30%...
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 08:44 AM   #3
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I_H8_Crawford View Post
Does Pearson seriously charge $20 for improvement fees?

That airport is TERRIBLE. They have no decent restaurants, nowhere to really wait past security, and have nowhere in the general terminal either. (Terminal 1)

At least Calgary has places like montana's and chilis on the premises.

I hate Pearson.
I thought Terminal 1 has been under reconstruction for a number of years and was recently completed?
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 08:45 AM   #4
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredr123 View Post
Fotze, I wasn't very good at math in school but $5 -> $20 seems more than 30%...
OK then. 33.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333%

(Would have made for a bad subject line IMHO)
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 09:15 AM   #5
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Isn't this like a 300% increase?

If the fees had doubled, it would be a 100% jump.
Since they increased by 3 times that amount, wouldn't is be 300% (3 x 100% increase)?

A 30% increase would be $5 to $6.50.

That headline from the Herald is screwed. Send Lisa Schmidt back to math class.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 09:19 AM   #6
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

33% of $15 is $5.

The fee went from $15 to $20. So up by $5; and 33% of $15 is $5.

(Am I the only one who can understand Fotze?)
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 09:25 AM   #7
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
33% of $15 is $5.

The fee went from $15 to $20. So up by $5; and 33% of $15 is $5.

(Am I the only one who can understand Fotze?)
I'm in the Bobblehead camp on this one. Going from $5 to $20 would be a 300% jump. However, after reading the quote in the paper about 8 times I see what they're getting at. The fee is going from $15 to $20. It's increasing by $5. Not fotze's fault, that is just a really poorly worded sentence IMHO.
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 09:28 AM   #8
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Yeah, it could be that I had heard this on the news this morning, so I already knew what they were talking about.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 09:29 AM   #9
RedHot25
Franchise Player
 
RedHot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Probably stuck driving someone somewhere
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
33% of $15 is $5.

The fee went from $15 to $20. So up by $5; and 33% of $15 is $5.

(Am I the only one who can understand Fotze?)
Ha I think so...I had to re-read it twice before I got it .

I think most people got "confused" by the first bolded part (below)...when you do a skimming read, it gives you the impression that the rate went up from 5 bucks to $20:

Starting June 1, the Calgary Airport Authority will raise its improvement fee by $5 to $20 for domestic and international flights. The charge for trips to Edmonton, Lethbridge, Medicine Hat and Lloydminster will rise $5 to $15 a ticket.

But if you have to stop and read it the first part is $15 to $20. same with the 2nd bolded part (from $10 to $15). Its right, but the way that it is written I could see causing some confusion... (not fotze, but the article).


Fredr -- beat me to it and in a much more concise way.
RedHot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 09:56 AM   #10
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHot25 View Post
Ha I think so...I had to re-read it twice before I got it .

I think most people got "confused" by the first bolded part (below)...when you do a skimming read, it gives you the impression that the rate went up from 5 bucks to $20:

Starting June 1, the Calgary Airport Authority will raise its improvement fee by $5 to $20 for domestic and international flights. The charge for trips to Edmonton, Lethbridge, Medicine Hat and Lloydminster will rise $5 to $15 a ticket.

But if you have to stop and read it the first part is $15 to $20. same with the 2nd bolded part (from $10 to $15). Its right, but the way that it is written I could see causing some confusion... (not fotze, but the article).


Fredr -- beat me to it and in a much more concise way.
By $5, not from $5 (D'oh! Reading comprehension is not my friend this morning. This has already turned into "One of THOSE days". *sigh*))
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 10:09 AM   #11
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

My problem isn't with the fees. Fine, that's a cost of doing business.

Just make it part of the cost of the ticket. Don't sell me a ticket to Winnipeg for $40, and the total cost return trip ends up being $250.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 10:41 AM   #12
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Exactly, when did it become the norm for businesses to break down the costs of a product into a series of fees so as to attempt to mislead the public.

Are we going to start seeing chocolate bars for 15 cents....plus the 20 cent peanut fee, 30 cent chocolate fee, 25 cent nougat fee, 15 cent quality control (wrapper) fee.

I know this isn't really related to this airport fee but it still peeves me.
I'm with you. Tell me how much I need to shell out. Your advertising of an artificially low amount just ****es me off when I find out the real cost.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 10:45 AM   #13
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Hidden fees are sadly becoming the norm. About a decade ago I started to see "Fuel tax" on top of shipping fees whenever we shipped something from our shop. Now it's the norm. When I get a quote, I get a rate "Plus tax", meaning "Plus a charge that we can throw on top so if we quote too low I'll add a whack of fees on top so we make more money".

Gone are the days of a single quote for what you pay. I think we can thank the auto makers for that one.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 10:47 AM   #14
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Exactly, when did it become the norm for businesses to break down the costs of a product into a series of fees so as to attempt to mislead the public.
Cell phone providers have been doing this since time immemorial. Your Rogers family plan is only $45/month! Act now! What they don't tell you is that there is a (bogus) system access fee for each phone, plus 911 charges, etc. Eerily similar to airline tickets.
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 11:10 AM   #15
eazyduzzit
Crash and Bang Winger
 
eazyduzzit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

I hate flying through Toronto with a passion. When i have to fly, I deliberately make sure i book a flight that connects somewhere else, even if it means paying $70 more or taking an extra hour. Anything beats going through customs at Pearson.

As for Calgary, as someone pointed out, they make massive customs rooms with about 7 detectors yet they only man 1-2.

Quite pathetic really.
eazyduzzit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 11:29 AM   #16
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Eh? I've been at YYC with all detectors manned. Now that's a zoo.

Still better than Pearson. The only airport where you have to change floors to catch a connecting flight!
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 01:36 PM   #17
eazyduzzit
Crash and Bang Winger
 
eazyduzzit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
Eh? I've been at YYC with all detectors manned. Now that's a zoo.

Still better than Pearson. The only airport where you have to change floors to catch a connecting flight!
That's not what bothers me.

It's the fact you have to wait and claim your baggage, line up at customs then get rid of your baggage again and THEN make your way accross the airport to your connecting flight.

If I fly international, I make sure I clear customs here by flying directly into the states for a connecting flight.
eazyduzzit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 01:41 PM   #18
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

I'm amazed at how sterile the new T1 is at YYZ. Clinical white everwhere the eye can see. It's like trying to make a sensory deprivation tank for 12,000 people.

At least we don't have to line up and actually pay those AIF fees seperately, like how YVR made you in about 2000. Then you got really mad....
I-Hate-Hulse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 07:15 PM   #19
T I M
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
Eh? I've been at YYC with all detectors manned. Now that's a zoo.

Still better than Pearson. The only airport where you have to change floors to catch a connecting flight!
Don't you have to change floors in calgary if your connecting to an US destination?
T I M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2007, 07:56 PM   #20
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
I'm with you. Tell me how much I need to shell out. Your advertising of an artificially low amount just ****es me off when I find out the real cost.
Wasn't there a law passed recently that will require the airlines to advertise the final price instead of the artificially low no-fees price? I thought it was supposed to be in effect by now, or did it die with the change of government.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy