Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2021, 07:29 PM   #21
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

lol I see Tkachuks hissy fit really got the team motivated for tonight.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:30 PM   #22
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

So moving a winger to C isn't the answer then?

LOL
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:35 PM   #23
Red_Baron
First Line Centre
 
Red_Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
Exp:
Default

I don't know, the only thing I know for sure is that Rittich needs to play a decent amount to be an okay goaltender, he is lousy in a backup role.

The last playoff game and now this, he just doesn't have the right mental balance for a backup role.
Red_Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 07:41 PM   #24
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Lol team sucks benny scores.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 07:41 PM   #25
Owen15
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12 View Post
Boggles the mind that Treliving decided to hire yet another unproven, 'bargain bin' head coach. Boudreau stated he would coach anywhere. Gerard Gallant is still out there... Seriously, Brad. Bite the freakin' bullet and get a proven head coach for once.
We’re getting schooled at every turn. That 5 day break = 2019 ASG
Owen15 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Owen15 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:44 PM   #26
Rubicant
First Line Centre
 
Rubicant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Exp:
Default

This team isn’t a contender for the cup, and that should really be the only goal.

We needed the Bennett pick to be for a 1st line centre and it just didn’t happen. We need higher end players and the main way to do that is to draft high and with lots of picks.

Do a proper rebuild for once and don’t try to shortcut your way out of it.

Of course none of this will happen, and I look forward to another 30 years of a franchise spinning its wheels and landing in the land of ‘meh’.
Rubicant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Rubicant For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:48 PM   #27
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
So moving a winger to C isn't the answer then?

LOL
Why would we want to move a winger to C when what we actually need IS a winger?

There was a lot of derision on this board in response to posts about signing Toffoli in the offseason, yet the guy has 16 goals in 19 games. Meanwhile, tons of support for the lateral swap of Monahan for PLD. I don’t get it. “Screw adding proven top-six offence on our wing without giving anything up... let’s give up a pile of assets to swap centermen for a net reduction in offence instead!

I don’t think some people here are quite as smart as they think they are.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FanIn80 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:49 PM   #28
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

The only thought re this thread that comes to mind is how tiring it has been hearing about all the trades the Flames were supposedly in on, that didn't come together for this reason or that....
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Manhattanboy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:50 PM   #29
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Lindholm is a center...he was moved to the wing
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:53 PM   #30
Abatedmean
Backup Goalie
 
Abatedmean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubicant View Post
This team isn’t a contender for the cup, and that should really be the only goal.

We needed the Bennett pick to be for a 1st line centre and it just didn’t happen. We need higher end players and the main way to do that is to draft high and with lots of picks.

Do a proper rebuild for once and don’t try to shortcut your way out of it.

Of course none of this will happen, and I look forward to another 30 years of a franchise spinning its wheels and landing in the land of ‘meh’.

Unless we can dump Lucic, sign Hall, and are either signing JG and SM or trading them for good value now, I am fine for a rebuild. But I don't want another rebuild like we did last time. In hindsight, that Hamonic trade was just such a bad idea. The team needed the picks and the prospects to keep internally developing.

So for me, unless we can get some pretty substantial stuff done in the next offseason. I would much rather trading JG and SM for some picks and just load up on the 22/23 drafts, and I would not mind tanking for a shot at Wright either as someone else above commented
Abatedmean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 07:54 PM   #31
the-rasta-masta
First Line Centre
 
the-rasta-masta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Turner Valley
Exp:
Default

Ridiculous thread after 6 games.

Arguably the Flames deserved to win the first game against the Leafs, didn't get the bounces. Since then we had a really poor start in the second leafs game, and then a real stinker tonight with Rittich letting in some weak goals.

Teams go through 2 games of playing poor hockey every season, even the best. It's not time to fully decide what this team is yet, because for the most part, with Markstrom in, they've only had just the one really poor period against the Leafs. Give it some time.
the-rasta-masta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to the-rasta-masta For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:55 PM   #32
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

The sooner a rebuild begins, the quicker we can watch this team mismanage itself right back into the middle of the pack with short sighted trades alongside poor coaching and free agent signings!
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:55 PM   #33
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Let's say Dube was in the lineup vs the Leafs; win one of those games and lose the other in extra time. Then lose this one vs the Habs as first regulation loss. 3-1-2 instead of 2-3-1.

Would we still be here talking about blowing it up? I doubt it. Let's hang in there and see how these next 10-15 games go before talking about blowing anything up.

Trading for the sake of trading doesn't necessarily make the situation better... a couple of big trades stand out... remember the one that brought Jokinen here, or the one that shipped Phaneuf out of town...

Last edited by Mathgod; 01-28-2021 at 07:59 PM.
Mathgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 07:58 PM   #34
SoulOfTheFlame
First Line Centre
 
SoulOfTheFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the-rasta-masta View Post
Ridiculous thread after 6 games.

Arguably the Flames deserved to win the first game against the Leafs, didn't get the bounces. Since then we had a really poor start in the second leafs game, and then a real stinker tonight with Rittich letting in some weak goals.

Teams go through 2 games of playing poor hockey every season, even the best. It's not time to fully decide what this team is yet, because for the most part, with Markstrom in, they've only had just the one really poor period against the Leafs. Give it some time.
I think we can fully decide they are mediocre AF.
__________________


SoulOfTheFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SoulOfTheFlame For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 07:59 PM   #35
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 08:00 PM   #36
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Baron View Post
I don't know, the only thing I know for sure is that Rittich needs to play a decent amount to be an okay goaltender, he is lousy in a backup role.

The last playoff game and now this, he just doesn't have the right mental balance for a backup role.

Yeah, his mental makeup would have made Gio cover Gallagher?

Would have stopped the Weber slapper that Valimaki deflected top shelf?
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 08:04 PM   #37
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

As much as I really like Treliving’s style, composure, professionalism and negotiation skills... I am still very much convinced that he is not the kind of GM who would want a veteran coach. Especially not one with a decent resume. Tree is only a few years in on his career as a GM, and veteran coaches are typically more willing to fight for something they want to do — especially ones who have won something before.

So what do we do? If we want a good coach with a pedigree, we’ll likely need a new GM first. It will have to be someone who himself has some pedigree, or we’re right back in square one again.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 08:07 PM   #38
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
As much as I really like Treliving’s style, composure, professionalism and negotiation skills... I am still very much convinced that he is not the kind of GM who would want a veteran coach. Especially not one with a decent resume. Tree is only a few years in on his career as a GM, and veteran coaches are typically more willing to fight for something they want to do — especially ones who have won something before.

So what do we do? If we want a good coach with a pedigree, we’ll likely need a new GM first. It will have to be someone who himself has some pedigree, or we’re right back in square one again.

I definitely had that opinion during Tre’s selection of GG and Peters. Couldn’t have a situation like Sutter who may get along with the owners

But he’s enough years in to this that he should be hiring best available
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 01-28-2021, 08:08 PM   #39
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

The team isn’t nearly as bad as it seems

I think still top 3 in the division*. We’ve had some bad periods and weird losses but it’s 6 games in and key additions have looked good like Markstrom

Ward’s player usage is terrifying though. Gulutzan-esque.

Last edited by neo45; 01-28-2021 at 08:11 PM.
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2021, 08:17 PM   #40
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Here’s a crazy thought... Connie and Tree as co-GMs.

Conroy in charge of personnel decisions for players and coaching staffs. Treliving in charge of contract and trade negotiations. Essentially Connie would be like, “I want player X, and these are my guys you can trade from.”

In terms of coaching changes, I don’t think Conroy would ever care about a power struggle. I think he’d bring in whatever coach he wants. He’s obviously a good guy, but I sense a very cutthroat side to him. I don’t think he’d have any problems at all with swinging some axes around.

We could ride that out until Tree’s contract is up and then it’s 100% Conroy.

Last edited by FanIn80; 01-28-2021 at 08:20 PM.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FanIn80 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy