I have a bold prediction. They'll stick around for a few comments, get destroyed on facts, then leave (never to return) because we're all stupid, hopeless and in a 'lib' bubble.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sliver For This Useful Post:
I tell you what, you go work on your basic use of grammar and syntax and when you can string a sentence together properly come back and teach us how data and a tin foil hat prove that the election that came back pretty much mirroring all of the pre election polling was improbable, in the mean time us Canadians will carry on laughing at your boy Trump.
lmao. I love it. Please show me where the polling mirrored the election. That's a special kind of stupid. The polling had Biden winning everything by much more than the false numbers. Did the polling look spot-on in 2016 to you as well?
AltaGuy has a magnetic personality and exudes positive energy, which is infectious to those around him. He has an unparalleled ability to communicate with people, whether he is speaking to a room of three or an arena of 30,000.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: At le pub...
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abatedmean
lmao. I love it. Please show me where the polling mirrored the election. That's a special kind of stupid. The polling had Biden winning everything by much more than the false numbers. Did the polling look spot-on in 2016 to you as well?
Forget all this. You promised us math. Show us the math!
I have a bold prediction. They'll stick around for a few comments, get destroyed on facts, then leave (never to return) because we're all stupid, hopeless and in a 'lib' bubble.
Trying to teach a cow to talk will just not happen, and they give up, they leave and never try again. We can only show you the evidence, it is up to you to be able to understand it.
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abatedmean
lmao. I love it. Please show me where the polling mirrored the election. That's a special kind of stupid. The polling had Biden winning everything by much more than the false numbers. Did the polling look spot-on in 2016 to you as well?
So you’re proof is that there must be fraud because the polls said Biden should have won by more?
Wouldn’t that mean Trump winning was even more improbable?
I know this won’t do anything, you’ll say it’s all fake, but here are 3 videos that explain exactly why all the “this is mathematically impossible” arguments are outright wrong.
I know you won’t watch those, but I’d love to hear why we should believe you, who has presented no numbers, over a pretty well respected mathematician with no skin in the game.
Go ahead show me any evidence that isn’t refuted by that.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN. <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
The Following User Says Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
lmao. I love it. Please show me where the polling mirrored the election. That's a special kind of stupid. The polling had Biden winning everything by much more than the false numbers. Did the polling look spot-on in 2016 to you as well?
What is up with your avatar?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
lmao. I love it. Please show me where the polling mirrored the election. That's a special kind of stupid. The polling had Biden winning everything by much more than the false numbers. Did the polling look spot-on in 2016 to you as well?
So the Democrats, Jews/Soros, Bill Gates and the pedophile lizard people with help from the reverse Vampires rigged an election to give their candidate less votes than he actually got as per the pre election polling and while they were there they decided not to give them selves a super majority in the Senate because they like to keep things interesting I guess, it's a wonder these morons were able to pull off 9/11 and the fake moon landings.
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Trying to teach a cow to talk will just not happen, and they give up, they leave and never try again. We can only show you the evidence, it is up to you to be able to understand it.
Hey, perhaps you should take a look at some data. I can help you with that. Data analyst.
I can bring you through everything as simple as you possibly need. Just in case your arrogance is because of your intellectual capacity or out of lack of research.
But yes, if you take the time to look at the statistical data, proven through multiple different methods, you would see, through no other speculation, that the numbers that have been certified are mathematically impossible and in other cases mathematically improbable to degrees your brain couldn't comprehend.
If you want to take a look, do it yourself, compare the standard deviation of voting turnout in PA as an example, compare it to the past 5 elections just to save time. Do it yourself. Let me know your results.
Are you saying because Biden got 5.5% more vote in PA than the previous Democratic record and Trump got 13.7% more than the previous Republicans record that Trump committed electoral fraud? That seems like a stretch to me, but I am willing to be convinced.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
lmao. I love it. Please show me where the polling mirrored the election. That's a special kind of stupid. The polling had Biden winning everything by much more than the false numbers. Did the polling look spot-on in 2016 to you as well?
I'm assuming this is the "big-brained" garbage you're trying to sell here?
The posts, such as those here and here , show graphs that compare candidate’s vote tallies by leading digit to the expected distribution according to Benford’s law in order to contend that Biden’s vote tallies do not follow Benford’s Law but Trump’s do. Posts state that Benford’s law is a test that has been used before to detect fraud (here) . Captions on the posts include, “Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law”; “It’s easy to win if you cheat”; “Statistically impossible odds […] now MATH doesn’t even agree with their faux victory.”
Theodore P. Hill, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, cautioned that regardless of the distribution uncovered, the application of Benford’s Law would not provide definitive evidence that fraud took place.
“First, I'd like to stress that Benford's Law can NOT be used to "prove fraud",” he told Reuters by email. “It is only a Red Flag test, that can raise doubts. E.g., the IRS has been using it for decades to ferret out fraudsters, but only by identifying suspicious entries, at which time they put the auditors to work on the hard evidence. Whether or not a dataset follows BL proves nothing.”
Trying to teach a cow to talk will just not happen, and they give up, they leave and never try again. We can only show you the evidence, it is up to you to be able to understand it.
Forget all this. You promised us math. Show us the math!
In a day of misinformation, I really encourage doing it on your own. being shown math that you already have a predisposition towards, makes you much more likely to just find something obscure to discredit it. However, if you do the research on your own, learn how to do some math that isn't overly difficult, and look at your own results, I think it has a much more empowering effect.
In a day of misinformation, I really encourage doing it on your own. being shown math that you already have a predisposition towards, makes you much more likely to just find something obscure to discredit it. However, if you do the research on your own, learn how to do some math that isn't overly difficult, and look at your own results, I think it has a much more empowering effect.
You made the claim, dip####. Onus is on you to provide the evidence to support it. I know Trumpers have issues understanding the concept of evidence, but it's generally required for people in reality to take you seriously.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
Trying to teach a cow to talk will just not happen, and they give up, they leave and never try again. We can only show you the evidence, it is up to you to be able to understand it.
That really speaks to me. Hey, you know what? Maybe you will have a good faith discussion. Maybe you won't lean on lies and mistruths. Maybe you won't twist the facts to suit your narrative.
In a day of misinformation, I really encourage doing it on your own. being shown math that you already have a predisposition towards, makes you much more likely to just find something obscure to discredit it. However, if you do the research on your own, learn how to do some math that isn't overly difficult, and look at your own results, I think it has a much more empowering effect.
Do yOuR rESeARcH! Lol. You guys are so predictable. Checkmate, Sliver.
The Following User Says Thank You to DownInFlames For This Useful Post:
In a day of misinformation, I really encourage doing it on your own. being shown math that you already have a predisposition towards, makes you much more likely to just find something obscure to discredit it. However, if you do the research on your own, learn how to do some math that isn't overly difficult, and look at your own results, I think it has a much more empowering effect.
AltaGuy has a magnetic personality and exudes positive energy, which is infectious to those around him. He has an unparalleled ability to communicate with people, whether he is speaking to a room of three or an arena of 30,000.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: At le pub...
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abatedmean
In a day of misinformation, I really encourage doing it on your own. being shown math that you already have a predisposition towards, makes you much more likely to just find something obscure to discredit it. However, if you do the research on your own, learn how to do some math that isn't overly difficult, and look at your own results, I think it has a much more empowering effect.
I'm really disappointed. You said you'd make my brain bigger, you big data analyst, you.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AltaGuy For This Useful Post: