View Poll Results: Who would you vote for?
|
Biden
|
  
|
6 |
66.67% |
Trump
|
  
|
3 |
33.33% |
Kanye/other/Independent
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Would not vote
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
01-07-2021, 10:58 AM
|
#8621
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:01 AM
|
#8622
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
Why is it always Democrats responsibility to reach across the aisle?
Where was Republican compromise in the last 12 years?
|
It's note solely their responsibility, but somebody has to be the adult in the room, you know, for the sake of governing the entire ####ing nation. The work needs to be done.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:09 AM
|
#8623
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I just got a FB scolding for saying the Camp Auschwitz staff hoodie guy needed a punch in the face. I thought that was how you were supposed to treat nazis.
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:10 AM
|
#8624
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
|
Can this be accomplished with only a simple majority in the senate?
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:14 AM
|
#8625
|
Monster Storm
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Has there been developments at all regarding the 25th or immediate impeachment?
__________________
Shameless self promotion
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:14 AM
|
#8626
|
Franchise Player
|
What would granting statehood to DC mean? Easier to call in national guard?
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:15 AM
|
#8627
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
What would granting statehood to DC mean? Easier to call in national guard?
|
They would have their own guard plus they would have representation in Congress which would almost certainly be Democratic.
edit- Same with Puerto Rico and maybe Guam.
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Red Slinger For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:16 AM
|
#8628
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
and 2 Senators.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:17 AM
|
#8629
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
Grant statehood to Puerto Rico while they're at it.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:18 AM
|
#8630
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Merge the Dakotas while they are at it.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:20 AM
|
#8631
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
Grant statehood to Puerto Rico while they're at it.
|
Isn't this a bit of a misrepresented issue on the left? I thought PR didn't overwhelming want statehood because they have a sweet spot with American protection and no federal tax right now?
I could be very wrong though
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:24 AM
|
#8632
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/51st_state
Quote:
On May 16, 2020, Puerto Rican Governor Wanda Vázquez announced that Puerto Rico would hold a nonbinding referendum on November 3, 2020 to decide whether Puerto Rico should become a state. As of November 4, 2020, with 95.11% of precincts reporting, statehood leads the referendum 52.19%–47.81%.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:26 AM
|
#8633
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull
Isn't this a bit of a misrepresented issue on the left? I thought PR didn't overwhelming want statehood because they have a sweet spot with American protection and no federal tax right now?
I could be very wrong though
|
The past referendums had a majority voting for statehood. It is shrinking though with more and more people actually becoming in favour of decolonization (they are technically still a colony) and independence.
There are political motives for Democrats to want DC and Puerto Rico to become states, but keep in mind that Republicans pushed for Hawaii to become a state for the same reason. It was seen a sure thing for the Republicans to get guaranteed reps, but fast forward to today, and it backfired.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 01-07-2021 at 11:30 AM.
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 11:33 AM
|
#8634
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
Can this be accomplished with only a simple majority in the senate?
|
My understanding is that statehood requires a clear desire from the citizens of the proposed state to become a state -- which there is in both DC and PR -- plus simple majority votes in both houses of congress followed by approval from the President.
With the Dems now having control of both houses and the White House, both could be pushed through if all votes were along straight party lines.
I don't know if all Democrat Senators would necessarily vote in favour of statehood for either or both.
PR isn't a guaranteed Democrat stronghold, but DC is. Adding 4 new senators would almost certainly break the tie and give the Dems a little breathing room.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 12:00 PM
|
#8635
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
DC would be such a weird state. Lots of people work there, but almost no one lives there. You could easily see the whole state in a day. Almost all of the land is federally owned. It's good strategically for the democrats, but it's pretty hard to justify it being a state.
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 12:02 PM
|
#8636
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
DC would be such a weird state. Lots of people work there, but almost no one lives there. You could easily see the whole state in a day. Almost all of the land is federally owned. It's good strategically for the democrats, but it's pretty hard to justify it being a state.
|
It has about the same population as either of the Dakota's and Montana and significantly more than Wyoming at 711,000 approx'
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 12:05 PM
|
#8637
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull
Isn't this a bit of a misrepresented issue on the left? I thought PR didn't overwhelming want statehood because they have a sweet spot with American protection and no federal tax right now?
I could be very wrong though
|
If there was only a resource where you could look that information up and find out how very wrong on all accounts you are?
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 12:11 PM
|
#8638
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
DC would be such a weird state. Lots of people work there, but almost no one lives there. You could easily see the whole state in a day. Almost all of the land is federally owned. It's good strategically for the democrats, but it's pretty hard to justify it being a state.
|
Yet everyone that does live there pays taxes, but has no representation. They should be a state.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to I_H8_Crawford For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-07-2021, 12:13 PM
|
#8639
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
If there was only a resource where you could look that information up and find out how very wrong on all accounts you are? 
|
Ohh Snarky
I didn't realize I accidently got under your skin enough to have you post that, sorry for that.
|
|
|
01-07-2021, 12:16 PM
|
#8640
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
DC would be such a weird state. Lots of people work there, but almost no one lives there. You could easily see the whole state in a day. Almost all of the land is federally owned. It's good strategically for the democrats, but it's pretty hard to justify it being a state.
|
I think it’s weirder that it’s not already a state, personally.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.
|
|