12-19-2020, 09:10 AM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
It would be monumentally stupid to spend all of this time developing Kylington, only to lose him for nothing on waivers and watch him reach his potential with another team. Somehow it also feels like such a typical Flames thing to do that I'm all but certain that it will happen.
|
Well it’s up to Kylington to prove he belongs full time play with the flames. Kylington and Anderson were drafted in the same year , same round , 10 spots from each other. They have both been given the same chance up to this point . One has flourished with his chance and the other has been adequate on some games and less then stellar in others. With the way Rafa and waivers are set up you have to prove yourself in that time frame to the original club that drafted you. This happens with all teams. It’s not just a Flames thing ,when they put young players on waivers. Plus I’m not 100 percent he would get claimed anyway. The 6th spot is ripe for the taking. If he can’t even get the 7th spot on the flames , why would other clubs be picking him up on waivers?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 09:29 AM
|
#62
|
Franchise Player
|
The time spent on his development is a sunk cost and shouldn’t be used to make decisions going forward
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 09:32 AM
|
#63
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Well it’s up to Kylington to prove he belongs full time play with the flames. Kylington and Anderson were drafted in the same year , same round , 10 spots from each other. They have both been given the same chance up to this point . One has flourished with his chance and the other has been adequate on some games and less then stellar in others. With the way Rafa and waivers are set up you have to prove yourself in that time frame to the original club that drafted you. This happens with all teams. It’s not just a Flames thing ,when they put young players on waivers. Plus I’m not 100 percent he would get claimed anyway. The 6th spot is ripe for the taking. If he can’t even get the 7th spot on the flames , why would other clubs be picking him up on waivers?
|
Very well said.
I like the player, and hope he settles things down in his own zone to the point that he can become a regular.
But to date I've seen the following ...
- good wheels but doesn't use the wheels to beat anyone when carrying the puck (rarely).
- not big and has some trouble in his own zone defensively.
but the thing that really stood out for me in the second half of last season was an almost paralysis when he had the puck from a D partner on a break out. If he didn't see an option he almost froze.
With wheels like he has just move! Things will open up!
But lots of skill there if he can make that jump to use his boots with the puck more often.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 09:43 AM
|
#64
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I fully agree with both Bingo and Kyuss. He looked pretty rattled and shell shocked in his last few games before the Covid stoppage.
Keep developing him slow and make him earn his minutes. If he can't earn minutes over Mackey, Nesterov or Yelesin and you lose him in the expansion draft then so be it.
I agree with everyone who sees his potential, but don't believe that his potential should guarantee him unearned minutes.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 09:59 AM
|
#65
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
But lots of skill there if he can make that jump to use his boots with the puck more often.
|
Play him on the right side. As a left handed shot he will have to take passes on his backhand and I think that will force him to skate more/ move his feet, in order to make the next play - much like Brodie. I agree 100% though he has to move and things will open up.
EDIT: I have no idea why they wouldn't at least try him on the right side. He says he likes there and maybe it unlocks his potential. It makes no sense not to try it out.
Last edited by Jeff Lebowski; 12-19-2020 at 10:21 AM.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 10:28 AM
|
#66
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Very well said.
I like the player, and hope he settles things down in his own zone to the point that he can become a regular.
But to date I've seen the following ...
- good wheels but doesn't use the wheels to beat anyone when carrying the puck (rarely).
- not big and has some trouble in his own zone defensively.
but the thing that really stood out for me in the second half of last season was an almost paralysis when he had the puck from a D partner on a break out. If he didn't see an option he almost froze.
With wheels like he has just move! Things will open up!
But lots of skill there if he can make that jump to use his boots with the puck more often.
|
This.
One thing you cannot teach is natural speed and agility. He has it in spades. Along with that speed he has to be able to think the game faster as well because he is simply moving faster. That's where his issues are and where the inconsistency pops up. And most of those times are in the d zone when he has the puck and needs to move it...either by foot or by pass. Coaching can only do so much in that kind of scenario and on top of that, this club (whether you agree or disagree) thinks of itself as a win-now team, and simply do not have the time to allow repeated mistakes that could cost them. Thats what the AHL is for, and again, why i believe (along with the 2 way deal) he starts the season with that squad where ever it may be located.
He can always come into camp and show management that he has it figured out, and wouldn't that be optimal?, but at this point....it just hasn't been proven yet and it may never materialize as we wish.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 11:13 AM
|
#67
|
Needs More Cowbell
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
|
Appeared to find another gear early last season, but regressed as the season wore on. Just needs some time and space, Gus-style minutes would likely do him well. Organization still seems unsure about him. Has a higher ceiling than Kulak, would be a shame to lose another solid #4/5 because the organization doesn't believe in their own.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 11:53 AM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
|
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund
Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio
Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool
Good news for Kylington as he would have to dress for 22 games to be the draft eligible D-man for the Flames.
This puts the Flames in the position of dealing with the Kraken ... Dube plus for them to pick Lucic and leave Backlund?
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 11:54 AM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
|
I doubt they protect Tanev
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 12:04 PM
|
#70
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund
Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio
Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool
Good news for Kylington as he would have to dress for 22 games to be the draft eligible D-man for the Flames.
This puts the Flames in the position of dealing with the Kraken ... Dube plus for them to pick Lucic and leave Backlund?
|
You want to trade Dube and something else just so they'll take Lucic? I'd rather just lose the one asset then give up 2 to lose another asset of my choice.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 12:33 PM
|
#71
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund
Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio
Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool...
|
Did the article have the Flames protecting 4+4? I can't see them opting to keep Tanev over one of Dube and Mangiapane.
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 12:38 PM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Did the article have the Flames protecting 4+4? I can't see them opting to keep Tanev over one of Dube and Mangiapane.
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
|
No, it did not.
They protected Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm, Tkachuk, Bennett, Mangiapane, Dube alongside Giordano, Andersson, Hanifin, and Markstrom.
Which I agree with fully.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 12:39 PM
|
#73
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The real "Cowtown"
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey-and_stuff
You want to trade Dube and something else just so they'll take Lucic? I'd rather just lose the one asset then give up 2 to lose another asset of my choice.
|
Of course ricardodw would want the Flames to trade Dube plus extras for Seattle to take Lucic. Ricardodw is a Jets fan.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CF84 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 12:52 PM
|
#74
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund
Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio
|
Did you read the article?
Yes the article said they would lose Backlund, but they had a 7+3 protection scheme instead of your “make sense” 4+4.
Are you misrepresenting their position in an attempt to further your opinion?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-19-2020, 01:02 PM
|
#75
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CF84
Of course ricardodw would want the Flames to trade Dube plus extras for Seattle to take Lucic. Ricardodw is a Jets fan.
|
I don't know that he is really a Jets fan, but ricardodw is DEFINITELY NOT a Flames fan. In every post he actively hopes only for their failure.
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Last edited by Textcritic; 12-19-2020 at 01:24 PM.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 01:28 PM
|
#76
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso
Did you read the article?
Yes the article said they would lose Backlund, but they had a 7+3 protection scheme instead of your “make sense” 4+4.
Are you misrepresenting their position in an attempt to further your opinion?
|
If you know ricardodw he is definitely misinterpreting things. That's his thing.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 02:04 PM
|
#77
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund
Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio
Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool
Good news for Kylington as he would have to dress for 22 games to be the draft eligible D-man for the Flames.
This puts the Flames in the position of dealing with the Kraken ... Dube plus for them to pick Lucic and leave Backlund?
|
I don’t even know what to say to this without sounding like a jerk.
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 02:39 PM
|
#78
|
Norm!
|
Wait trading Dube to keep Backlund?
I want some of what he's having.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 02:41 PM
|
#79
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Wait trading Dube to keep Backlund?
I want some of what he's having.
|
Not just Dube, Dube+
|
|
|
12-19-2020, 05:07 PM
|
#80
|
Franchise Player
|
I predict that:
Tre will do nothing.
The Krakens will select Milan Lucic with their expansion pick.
CP will collectively go WTF and crash for about 5 min.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.
|
|