Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-19-2020, 09:10 AM   #61
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov View Post
It would be monumentally stupid to spend all of this time developing Kylington, only to lose him for nothing on waivers and watch him reach his potential with another team. Somehow it also feels like such a typical Flames thing to do that I'm all but certain that it will happen.
Well it’s up to Kylington to prove he belongs full time play with the flames. Kylington and Anderson were drafted in the same year , same round , 10 spots from each other. They have both been given the same chance up to this point . One has flourished with his chance and the other has been adequate on some games and less then stellar in others. With the way Rafa and waivers are set up you have to prove yourself in that time frame to the original club that drafted you. This happens with all teams. It’s not just a Flames thing ,when they put young players on waivers. Plus I’m not 100 percent he would get claimed anyway. The 6th spot is ripe for the taking. If he can’t even get the 7th spot on the flames , why would other clubs be picking him up on waivers?
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 09:29 AM   #62
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

The time spent on his development is a sunk cost and shouldn’t be used to make decisions going forward
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 09:32 AM   #63
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Well it’s up to Kylington to prove he belongs full time play with the flames. Kylington and Anderson were drafted in the same year , same round , 10 spots from each other. They have both been given the same chance up to this point . One has flourished with his chance and the other has been adequate on some games and less then stellar in others. With the way Rafa and waivers are set up you have to prove yourself in that time frame to the original club that drafted you. This happens with all teams. It’s not just a Flames thing ,when they put young players on waivers. Plus I’m not 100 percent he would get claimed anyway. The 6th spot is ripe for the taking. If he can’t even get the 7th spot on the flames , why would other clubs be picking him up on waivers?
Very well said.

I like the player, and hope he settles things down in his own zone to the point that he can become a regular.

But to date I've seen the following ...

- good wheels but doesn't use the wheels to beat anyone when carrying the puck (rarely).
- not big and has some trouble in his own zone defensively.

but the thing that really stood out for me in the second half of last season was an almost paralysis when he had the puck from a D partner on a break out. If he didn't see an option he almost froze.

With wheels like he has just move! Things will open up!

But lots of skill there if he can make that jump to use his boots with the puck more often.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 09:43 AM   #64
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

I fully agree with both Bingo and Kyuss. He looked pretty rattled and shell shocked in his last few games before the Covid stoppage.

Keep developing him slow and make him earn his minutes. If he can't earn minutes over Mackey, Nesterov or Yelesin and you lose him in the expansion draft then so be it.

I agree with everyone who sees his potential, but don't believe that his potential should guarantee him unearned minutes.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 09:59 AM   #65
Jeff Lebowski
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post

But lots of skill there if he can make that jump to use his boots with the puck more often.
Play him on the right side. As a left handed shot he will have to take passes on his backhand and I think that will force him to skate more/ move his feet, in order to make the next play - much like Brodie. I agree 100% though he has to move and things will open up.

EDIT: I have no idea why they wouldn't at least try him on the right side. He says he likes there and maybe it unlocks his potential. It makes no sense not to try it out.

Last edited by Jeff Lebowski; 12-19-2020 at 10:21 AM.
Jeff Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 10:28 AM   #66
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Very well said.

I like the player, and hope he settles things down in his own zone to the point that he can become a regular.

But to date I've seen the following ...

- good wheels but doesn't use the wheels to beat anyone when carrying the puck (rarely).
- not big and has some trouble in his own zone defensively.

but the thing that really stood out for me in the second half of last season was an almost paralysis when he had the puck from a D partner on a break out. If he didn't see an option he almost froze.

With wheels like he has just move! Things will open up!

But lots of skill there if he can make that jump to use his boots with the puck more often.
This.

One thing you cannot teach is natural speed and agility. He has it in spades. Along with that speed he has to be able to think the game faster as well because he is simply moving faster. That's where his issues are and where the inconsistency pops up. And most of those times are in the d zone when he has the puck and needs to move it...either by foot or by pass. Coaching can only do so much in that kind of scenario and on top of that, this club (whether you agree or disagree) thinks of itself as a win-now team, and simply do not have the time to allow repeated mistakes that could cost them. Thats what the AHL is for, and again, why i believe (along with the 2 way deal) he starts the season with that squad where ever it may be located.

He can always come into camp and show management that he has it figured out, and wouldn't that be optimal?, but at this point....it just hasn't been proven yet and it may never materialize as we wish.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 11:13 AM   #67
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Appeared to find another gear early last season, but regressed as the season wore on. Just needs some time and space, Gus-style minutes would likely do him well. Organization still seems unsure about him. Has a higher ceiling than Kulak, would be a shame to lose another solid #4/5 because the organization doesn't believe in their own.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 11:53 AM   #68
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund

Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio

Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool


Good news for Kylington as he would have to dress for 22 games to be the draft eligible D-man for the Flames.

This puts the Flames in the position of dealing with the Kraken ... Dube plus for them to pick Lucic and leave Backlund?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 11:54 AM   #69
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

I doubt they protect Tanev
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 12:04 PM   #70
Hockey-and_stuff
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund



Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio



Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool





Good news for Kylington as he would have to dress for 22 games to be the draft eligible D-man for the Flames.



This puts the Flames in the position of dealing with the Kraken ... Dube plus for them to pick Lucic and leave Backlund?
You want to trade Dube and something else just so they'll take Lucic? I'd rather just lose the one asset then give up 2 to lose another asset of my choice.
Hockey-and_stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 12:33 PM   #71
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund



Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio



Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool...
Did the article have the Flames protecting 4+4? I can't see them opting to keep Tanev over one of Dube and Mangiapane.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 12:38 PM   #72
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Did the article have the Flames protecting 4+4? I can't see them opting to keep Tanev over one of Dube and Mangiapane.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
No, it did not.

They protected Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm, Tkachuk, Bennett, Mangiapane, Dube alongside Giordano, Andersson, Hanifin, and Markstrom.

Which I agree with fully.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 12:39 PM   #73
CF84
Powerplay Quarterback
 
CF84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The real "Cowtown"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey-and_stuff View Post
You want to trade Dube and something else just so they'll take Lucic? I'd rather just lose the one asset then give up 2 to lose another asset of my choice.
Of course ricardodw would want the Flames to trade Dube plus extras for Seattle to take Lucic. Ricardodw is a Jets fan.
CF84 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CF84 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 12:52 PM   #74
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund

Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio
Did you read the article?

Yes the article said they would lose Backlund, but they had a 7+3 protection scheme instead of your “make sense” 4+4.

Are you misrepresenting their position in an attempt to further your opinion?
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
Old 12-19-2020, 01:02 PM   #75
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CF84 View Post
Of course ricardodw would want the Flames to trade Dube plus extras for Seattle to take Lucic. Ricardodw is a Jets fan.
I don't know that he is really a Jets fan, but ricardodw is DEFINITELY NOT a Flames fan. In every post he actively hopes only for their failure.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project

Last edited by Textcritic; 12-19-2020 at 01:24 PM.
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 01:28 PM   #76
Hockey-and_stuff
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso View Post
Did you read the article?

Yes the article said they would lose Backlund, but they had a 7+3 protection scheme instead of your “make sense” 4+4.

Are you misrepresenting their position in an attempt to further your opinion?
If you know ricardodw he is definitely misinterpreting things. That's his thing.
Hockey-and_stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 02:04 PM   #77
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
For those of you that are afraid of losing Kylington in the expansion draft Eric Duhatschek and Ryan S. Clark at the Athletic have The Flames losing Backlund

Which makes perfect sense if they protect Andersson, Hanifin, Tanev and Gio

Leaves Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm and Tkachuk as protected forwards and Lucic, Bennett, Mangiapane and Dube along with Backlund in the available pool


Good news for Kylington as he would have to dress for 22 games to be the draft eligible D-man for the Flames.

This puts the Flames in the position of dealing with the Kraken ... Dube plus for them to pick Lucic and leave Backlund?
I don’t even know what to say to this without sounding like a jerk.

SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 02:39 PM   #78
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Wait trading Dube to keep Backlund?


I want some of what he's having.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 02:41 PM   #79
Hockey-and_stuff
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Wait trading Dube to keep Backlund?


I want some of what he's having.
Not just Dube, Dube+
Hockey-and_stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 05:07 PM   #80
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

I predict that:

Tre will do nothing.
The Krakens will select Milan Lucic with their expansion pick.
CP will collectively go WTF and crash for about 5 min.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy