Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-14-2007, 04:41 PM   #1
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default Calgary Ring Road Proposal- some cool maps

I was poking around the Alberta Gov't's site and stumbled across a map that shows the proposed ring road, and all the interchanges.
http://www.infratrans.gov.ab.ca/INFT...on/cphpmap.htm

At first it may appear to be somewhat unimpressive, but click on the section of ring road that you are interested in, and it will bring you to a new page showing the interchanges and what they will look like. For example, living in McKenzie Towne I was curious to see what the 52nd Street interchange with 22X was going to look like. Here it is: http://www.infratrans.gov.ab.ca/INFT.../P-3247-59.pdf

Hopefully this will be all done before my grandchildren have to drive me around because I'm too old.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 04:46 PM   #2
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
Hopefully this will be all done before my grandchildren have to drive me around because I'm too old.
Very interesting, thanks for sharing this.

Whats the over/under on this being done by 2017?
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 05:16 PM   #3
Ironhorse
Franchise Player
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I noticed that nothing is being done with the Southland Tr / Deerfoot S interchange...
Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 05:20 PM   #4
Incinerator
Franchise Player
 
Incinerator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 30 minutes from the Red Mile
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Very interesting, thanks for sharing this.

Whats the over/under on this being done by 2017?
Over!
Incinerator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 05:22 PM   #5
arsenal
Director of the HFBI
 
arsenal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Very interesting, thanks for sharing this.

Whats the over/under on this being done by 2017?
Well since this bloody thing has been in the works since my parents bought a house in calgary (early 70's), I am going to go with the over.

City council needs to sit down and hammer this thing out. It was needed 5 years ago. By the time this actually gets completed, it will be inadequate for what the current traffic levels would (will) be. And an expansion will be needed to planned imediately. Which will then be completed by 2100.


Enough of the talk.. action needs to be taken.
__________________
"Opinions are like demo tapes, and I don't want to hear yours" -- Stephen Colbert
arsenal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 05:24 PM   #6
Mccree
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Very interesting, thanks for sharing this.

Whats the over/under on this being done by 2017?
WAY OVER.
__________________

Mccree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 06:37 PM   #7
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mccree View Post
WAY OVER.

hahah really? I mean that IS 10 years... quite a long time... hmm..
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 06:49 PM   #8
Kerplunk
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Kerplunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Trapped in my own code!!
Exp:
Default

Are those interchanges, or huge clumps of spaghetti? Hope the engineers know what they are doing (not gonna hold my breath).
Kerplunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 08:01 PM   #9
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Whats with calgary having huge breaks in roads yet keping the name the same? Barlow Tr.? Stoney Tr.? Sarcee Tr.?

I can understand if they were planning to complete the road within a reasonable time period...
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 08:15 PM   #10
Mccree
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
hahah really? I mean that IS 10 years... quite a long time... hmm..
Ya, it has taken this long to get the it started and they have been fighting over the land that the Tsun na (SP) has in the south for over 30 years!!
__________________

Mccree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 08:21 PM   #11
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

They've been working on the Stoney - Country Hills intersection. I thought I heard that they stopped work on it, but I guess not.

It'll be nice to have that new section of Stoney Tr, whenever that will be. We'll probably have hover cars or something by then.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 08:31 PM   #12
Addick
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Addick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenal View Post
Well since this bloody thing has been in the works since my parents bought a house in calgary (early 70's), I am going to go with the over.

City council needs to sit down and hammer this thing out. It was needed 5 years ago. By the time this actually gets completed, it will be inadequate for what the current traffic levels would (will) be. And an expansion will be needed to planned imediately. Which will then be completed by 2100.


Enough of the talk.. action needs to be taken.

This is actually a Provincial project so they would be the ones to sit down and hammer it out. With the city's current transport plan and weak planning policy the building of this ring road would be a huge mistake, you kind of alluded to the reason in your post (the bound of capacity). Solving traffic congestion by adding to the road capacity is not the way to go.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”

- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Addick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 08:44 PM   #13
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Sucks for the rich *******s ont he slopes..... their little hillside paradise would be a little more noisey.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:08 PM   #14
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesla View Post
Sucks for the rich *******s ont he slopes..... their little hillside paradise would be a little more noisey.



Yep, cause those rich ****ers don't deserve to reap the fruit of their labour.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:40 PM   #15
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenal View Post
Well since this bloody thing has been in the works since my parents bought a house in calgary (early 70's), I am going to go with the over.

City council needs to sit down and hammer this thing out. It was needed 5 years ago. By the time this actually gets completed, it will be inadequate for what the current traffic levels would (will) be. And an expansion will be needed to planned imediately. Which will then be completed by 2100.


Enough of the talk.. action needs to be taken.
IMO, the whole hold up is the SW portion, and the Natives and their lands.
They're the ones dragging their feet in all this for the past 2+ years.
I've been to the sessions, since we live in Lakeview, only about 50 m from the south side of Glenmore.

Everything planning wise, is ready to go....when we first moved here two years ago, I read in the community newspaper that Glenmore was going to be expanded from Crowchild through to 37th...and this was just after we moved in, thinking that'd we'd be suddenly almost backing onto a widended Glenmore (as it turns out, the barrier would be higher, and the embankment on the south side of Glenmore would just be reduced...the north side is getting the brunt of the new lanes).

However, at the first meeting in Summer 2005 a couple months later, I asked at an open house to one of the city planners, as that widening of Glenmore wasn't on any on the maps or posters that had rolled out like had previously been discuseed and shown. He said that they pulled those off the table (publically) basically because it would give the natives more/better access to the Casino thats going up at 37th and Glenmore (supposedly done this summer now). The city wanted no part of giving that casino project any favours such as an expanded Glenmore, until the land issue for the ring road was solved.

To this day, there hasn't been any mention of the expanded Glenmore, which will be vital when the big interchange at Highway 8 (roughly) will be a big hub, and a natural progression from the bridge expansion near 14th street that's going to be done by the end of the year. The Garrison Woods project on the north side of Glenmore has already contructed the new barrier wall that's 30 ft closer to allow the road to be expanded as per the city's plan.

The plan is to have a bypass at about the current 37th street connected onto the ring road (so you don't have to drive as far west to start going south)...that bypass will also service the Casino. 37th street will be closed to any sort of acess to the casino, basically making it an local use only road, which is great.

Again, however, everything seems on hold. The Casino I mentioned has a big sign as per opening Summer 2007. Ambitious, since I don't think ground's been turned yet. I also know that the city isn't going to budge on providing much if any infrasturcture to it until they get the land that has been agreed on by all parties, as all that's left to do is to hammer out the price. I don't think we'll see a casino there until this is all sorted out.

However, the Tsuu Tina is playing hardball I guess. They got paid 1$ million dollars a year for 100 years for that land at 37th St and Glenmore, when the Canadian Forces used it. With that revenue not coming in anymore, the band (already in the past decade, completley mismangaed finanically) is struggling, so I think they are looking to cash in big time.

As an aside, the band wanted the Government to keep all the buildings on the land, which the band wanted to (they say) use as a school and etc, when the real plan was to lease it out to commercial business)..Government said no way, the treaty signed 100 years previous said land had to be returned to original state.

Talk in the same local newsletter last month, that the city is once again revisiting (from 5 years ago) using 37th St as the ring road, so it avoids native land and alternative to paying the natives a dime. I don't know how it would connect in that map to Stonley Trail in the NW, but apparently it can be done.

Of course, then you have a whole other opposition..residents of Lakeview who leave near what would turn from a 2 lane road to a 8 lane road, and it would cut right through the heart of the Weaselhead. NOT, an easy project to pass in its own right.

So, in summary, the city is ready to enact plans, as the deals were thought to have been struck for the land needed, but the Tsuu Tina is asking for more after the fact, which has held this up for at least 2 extra years in the SW portion, which is the trickiest, but most vital IMO, to making this a true ring road and a true alternative to travelling from south to west, and west to south arond the city.

Last edited by browna; 02-14-2007 at 10:48 PM.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 11:11 PM   #16
Thunderball
Franchise Player
 
Thunderball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Its a combination of being a shame and utterly ridiculous. However, I think its time the city takes the political backlash and builds the road along the 37th alignment. The natives are clearly out to screw the city.

Good for the city to have an aggressive Plan B, and I hope they quickly implement it and go one step further... eliminate the connection to Bullhead Rd. and remove those lights.
Thunderball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 11:33 PM   #17
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Very interesting how they are overcoming the Scenic Acres Link/Tuscany Blvd issue. Pretty smart design to kill both of those with one interchange.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 11:45 PM   #18
arsenal
Director of the HFBI
 
arsenal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well once the casino is finished, someone is going to cave. Traffic in that area is already bad enough. I realize that the Tsuu Tina nation is part of the party that is currently holding up the process.
What it is going to take is a politician who is willing to put their career on the line to get this thing started. From what it looks like, because not everyone can come to an agreement that everyone is happy with, someone is not going to get what they want.
And the politician who gets the project going, will likely be removed from office after the fact.
__________________
"Opinions are like demo tapes, and I don't want to hear yours" -- Stephen Colbert
arsenal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 12:20 AM   #19
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
Very interesting how they are overcoming the Scenic Acres Link/Tuscany Blvd issue. Pretty smart design to kill both of those with one interchange.
What Tuscany wants, Tuscany gets
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 12:36 AM   #20
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

My mistake, I guess that Casino is under construction...it must be further away from 37th than I thought.

Regardless, lets hope Bronco holds to his promise here from a few months ago:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2006/09...ino-mayor.html

I can see 37th being a nightmare, and Lakview streets nearby used as a parking lot and/or shortcut if there is only one little road into the casino as there is now.

There has to be some sort of updated timetable or plan in place from either side...not that I want the city to give in, but they have to have something planned for when this place opens.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy