10-12-2020, 01:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Habs sign Toffoli (4 yrs, $4.25 mil AAV)
Canadiens Montréal
@CanadiensMTL
The Canadiens have agreed to terms with forward Tyler Toffoli on a four-year contract (until 2023-24). The deal has an average annual value of $4.25 million.
Details to come.
Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Tyler Toffoli's $17M, four-year contract with the #habs will be paid entirely in salary and doesn't include any trade restrictions.
Last edited by sureLoss; 10-12-2020 at 01:11 PM.
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:08 PM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
Boohoo
For 4 million i think its a deal
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:09 PM
|
#3
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Hoffman likely drops next.
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:09 PM
|
#4
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: YYC
|
Welp thats cool. Flames likely just gonna roll same forward group as last year. Ugh.
__________________
"Some may have more talent, but there is no excuse for anyone working harder than you"
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:10 PM
|
#5
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
^ Nah. Trade probably coming.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Didn't what's his name in here say Vancouver was giving him 5+?
Out east is good, although I'm not sure how good he actually is...little over rated to me
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:11 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Pretty good deal. Only takes him to 32, so these should be 4 productive years for him.
Toffoli on a deal like this would have been a clear win for the Flames and an upgrade to the team. I still just can't like that Tanev deal at the end of the day when all these other great value contracts are being handed out.
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:11 PM
|
#8
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Snooze you lose. That's decent.
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:11 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fire_starter
Welp thats cool. Flames likely just gonna roll same forward group as last year. Ugh.
|
Do we really have to do this with every signing? Flames don't get a chance to match every signing. 31 teams and guys are free to go where they want.
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 40 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
1_Flames_Fan,
activeStick,
agulati,
Brodieyouevenlift,
btimbit,
Cecil Terwilliger,
chummer,
cral12,
D as in David,
Dan403,
Eric Vail,
FanIn80,
ForeverFlameFan,
GioforPM,
GreenLantern2814,
HitterD,
HockeyKhan,
ignite09,
Inferno099,
Kasi,
kbvall,
KevinKlineReadingABook,
KootenayFlamesFan,
lambeburger,
Madman,
Mr.Coffee,
N26,
Nammer403,
nwflamesfan,
Owen15,
Party Elephant,
Radio,
robertsfanatic,
Rollin22x,
Scroopy Noopers,
Stillman16,
The Fonz,
TheIronMaiden,
the_only_turek_fan,
Winsor_Pilates
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:13 PM
|
#10
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
That's less than I thought he would get, but still more than I would have given him.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JTech780 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:13 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Do we really have to do this with every signing?
|
Yeah, the frustration of having our top forwards fold in the playoffs still isn't gone - so this will be an off-season of heavy criticism of a group that has continually choked.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:14 PM
|
#12
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Inevitable comparison, as it is essentially the same contract as Tanev. I think I would have preferred Toffoli, but I am glad we got one of them. We needed both, but could only afford one.
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:14 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Not bad. I would have liked that deal on a 3 year term for the Flames.
Weird the Canucks couldn’t have made that work?
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:15 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
I do that deal all day no questions it’s comparable to the Hudler deal IMO. Damn.
Their right side is packed now with Anderson, Toffoli and Gallagher... I wonder if a deal could be had for Gallagher??
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:15 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
that's a contract i would have loved tbh... i thought it would take something over 5...
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:15 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Inevitable comparison, as it is essentially the same contract as Tanev. I think I would have preferred Toffoli, but I am glad we got one of them. We needed both, but could only afford one.
|
End of the day the Flames needed a second pair RD more than a second line RW even though it is close
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:15 PM
|
#17
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: YYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Do we really have to do this with every signing? Flames don't get a chance to match every signing. 31 teams and guys are free to go where they want.
|
True but flames are losing out on all the big names still out there.
__________________
"Some may have more talent, but there is no excuse for anyone working harder than you"
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:15 PM
|
#18
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Inevitable comparison, as it is essentially the same contract as Tanev. I think I would have preferred Toffoli, but I am glad we got one of them. We needed both, but could only afford one.
|
Who says the guy wanted to come here for that money? And the season starts in 3 months...maybe
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:16 PM
|
#19
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Doesn't sound like the flames were ever that high on Toffoli. Could have got him at the trade deadline or now but passed both times.
I have to believe that they will address the forward group shakeup with a trade.
It makes sense they shored up the defense with Tanev versus signing Tofolli. Losing Brodie and Hamonic left a big hole on the right side and Mangiapane was ok in the top 6. Bringing in Tofolli would have pushed him down which isn't necessary at this time.
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2020, 01:16 PM
|
#20
|
|
Franchise Player
|
REALLY surprised that the Canucks wouldn't have given him that.
I know Blaster will be along to tell us that Benning was only willing to offer XXX, but at the end of the day, you have to pay the palyers what they are worth.
The Canucks have taken a downgrade in goal, and have watched Tanev, Stecher and Toffoli walk.
Dim Jim is knocking it out of the park!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.
|
|
