View Poll Results: Best player to wear this number?
|
Doug Gilmour
|
  
|
247 |
95.74% |
Brian Skrudland
|
  
|
2 |
0.78% |
Dan Keczmer
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Benoit Gratton
|
  
|
1 |
0.39% |
TJ Galiardi
|
  
|
2 |
0.78% |
Alex Chiasson
|
  
|
1 |
0.39% |
Cam Talbot
|
  
|
5 |
1.94% |
05-04-2020, 01:03 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
That trade went down when I was sick as a dog on the couch for two days.
My dad tried to explain it to me but it made so little sense that I thought I had dreamed it when I woke up again.
|
conversely I remember half-heartedly trying to rationalize this trade to my dad- which ended being impossible - and involved Godynyuk somehow being the unrecognized reincarnation of Denis Potvin
god what a
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:12 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Am I understanding that right, and Pat Verbeek was on the table and the Flames opted for the Toronto package?
The little ball of hate would have looked great in a Flames uniform.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:15 PM
|
#23
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canadian Airlines Saddledome
|
Wow. Having Verbeek and Fleury would have been amazing. Can you imagine how much more annoying the team would’ve been to play against? I’m gonna try not to think too much about this one...
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:20 PM
|
#24
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by looooob
conversely I remember half-heartedly trying to rationalize this trade to my dad- which ended being impossible - and involved Godynyuk somehow being the unrecognized reincarnation of Denis Potvin
god what a 
|
I just don't get how a group in hockey management could come up with this trade.
Petit and Berube were known bottom roster players ... you can probably toss Nattress into that mix as well.
Manderville and Godynyuk were prospects ... so fair if they valued the defenseman more.
Two backup goaltenders, I guess Reese was younger.
So basically it had to come down to massively over valuing Leeman. But it wouldn't have taken more than just looking at his hockey card. He was in the middle of his second straight poor season after his outlier 95 point season. He was already 28 so not likely to get better and was dealt for a player who was 3.5 years into his Calgary career at well over a point per game.
Just don't get it. Didn't get it then. Don't get it now.
They almost lost on every single player to player comparison.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:25 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
They almost lost on every single player to player comparison.
|
Oh I think they probably did- in fact they came damn close to the getting the 5 worst players in a 10 player deal
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to looooob For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:28 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
I still remember when Leeman finally scored. I think against LA - on a shot from the point that basically grazed his stuck on the way in.
He was a little better the next year - including a hat-trick game, but it was clear it wasn't going to work.
This is how the Flames assets ended up eroding to absolutely nothing:
- Leeman was traded for Skrudland, who was then lost in the expansion draft
- Berube with traded for a 5th, used to draft Darryl LaFrance
- Godnyuk was lost in the expansion draft
- Petit was signed by LA as a free agent
- Reese was traded for Dan Keczmer, who was then dealt, with Housley for Albelin, Cale Hulse and Jocelyn Lemiuex. Albelin eventually left as a FA. Hulse was traded for Sergei Krivokrasov, then claimed in the expansion draft. Lemieux left as a FA.
Point is the Flames, not too long after the deal, had nothing left from the trade. The most valuable asset proved to be the frickin' backup goalie.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:32 PM
|
#27
|
All I can get
|
Needs a couple of Talbot votes for a credible second-place #39.
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:35 PM
|
#28
|
Marshmallow Maiden
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop
Needs a couple of Talbot votes for a credible second-place #39.
|
Done. I'll never vote for Gilmour.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mango For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2020, 01:58 PM
|
#29
|
GOAT!
|
Killer gonna kill it.
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 02:25 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
That trade went down when I was sick as a dog on the couch for two days.
My dad tried to explain it to me but it made so little sense that I thought I had dreamed it when I woke up again.
|
That trade made me sick, as I'm sure it did for most other Flames fans too.
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 02:28 PM
|
#31
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Durham NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
I still remember when Leeman finally scored. I think against LA - on a shot from the point that basically grazed his stuck on the way in.
He was a little better the next year - including a hat-trick game, but it was clear it wasn't going to work.
This is how the Flames assets ended up eroding to absolutely nothing:
- Leeman was traded for Skrudland, who was then lost in the expansion draft
- Berube with traded for a 5th, used to draft Darryl LaFrance
- Godnyuk was lost in the expansion draft
- Petit was signed by LA as a free agent
- Reese was traded for Dan Keczmer, who was then dealt, with Housley for Albelin, Cale Hulse and Jocelyn Lemiuex. Albelin eventually left as a FA. Hulse was traded for Sergei Krivokrasov, then claimed in the expansion draft. Lemieux left as a FA.
Point is the Flames, not too long after the deal, had nothing left from the trade. The most valuable asset proved to be the frickin' backup goalie.
|
I like to look back on the original Skrudland deal. In theory, that seemed like a great late '93 addition for us to make a run that year.
My attempt at the lines that year going into the playoffs (call me out if something seems off)
Roberts - Nieuwy - Makarov
Ranheim - Reichel - Theo
Ashton - Otto - Stern
Berube - Skrudland - Paslawski
Musil - Chopper
Suter - Yawney
Dahlquist - Dahl/Johansson
That feels like a team that could have made a run. Too bad we laid a brick against LA that season. Anyone have any deep dive memories on what happened in that series? 99 just too much?
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 02:50 PM
|
#32
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoastFlamesFan
I like to look back on the original Skrudland deal. In theory, that seemed like a great late '93 addition for us to make a run that year.
My attempt at the lines that year going into the playoffs (call me out if something seems off)
Roberts - Nieuwy - Makarov
Ranheim - Reichel - Theo
Ashton - Otto - Stern
Berube - Skrudland - Paslawski
Musil - Chopper
Suter - Yawney
Dahlquist - Dahl/Johansson
That feels like a team that could have made a run. Too bad we laid a brick against LA that season. Anyone have any deep dive memories on what happened in that series? 99 just too much?
|
Flames had a .814 team save percentage in six games!
I have memories of pulled goalies .. certainly matches that stat!
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 02:59 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
|
Wow, Verbeek and Mackenzie is such a superior deal. And not having to give up the better backup and two solid defensemen for no reason. That trade really was a franchise killer, gutted the team depth.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 04:41 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the dark side of Sesame Street
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
That trade went down when I was sick as a dog on the couch for two days.
My dad tried to explain it to me but it made so little sense that I thought I had dreamed it when I woke up again.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
That trade made me sick, as I'm sure it did for most other Flames fans too.
|
My appendix exploded not long after the trade. I've always wondered if the two were linked.
__________________
"If Javex is your muse…then dive in buddy"
- Surferguy
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Puppet Guy For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-04-2020, 05:28 PM
|
#35
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I seem to recall hearing that that trade had a lot to do with money. Not just Gilmour's contract but Macoun & Natress were also looking for big money (Natress left the leafs as a FA for PHI cash). I also recall a rumour that ownership was willing to go break-even until 1990 and then the team had to be profitable after that and in that economic climate that meant keeping salaries down (hence the future star exodus).
Let's also note that the team with Gilmour only made it out of the 1st round once and was on the way to missing the playoffs that year. The Flames didn't do any better in '93 or '94, but no worse either. Just saying he was way better than Leeman (hell, I'm better than Leeman), but he wasn't the second coming of Gretzky either.
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 05:44 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleeding Red
I seem to recall hearing that that trade had a lot to do with money. Not just Gilmour's contract but Macoun & Natress were also looking for big money (Natress left the leafs as a FA for PHI cash). I also recall a rumour that ownership was willing to go break-even until 1990 and then the team had to be profitable after that and in that economic climate that meant keeping salaries down (hence the future star exodus).
Let's also note that the team with Gilmour only made it out of the 1st round once and was on the way to missing the playoffs that year. The Flames didn't do any better in '93 or '94, but no worse either. Just saying he was way better than Leeman (hell, I'm better than Leeman), but he wasn't the second coming of Gretzky either.
|
sure money was a big factor here - but that doesn't defend how poorly they did in the trade (sneaky Cliff..) and we can agree the Flames under achieved post 89...but Gilmour was pretty damn good- look at his 2 first full years with the leafs- 238 regular season and 63 playoff points- he did go supernova for a while
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 05:49 PM
|
#37
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
The mismanagement of Skrudland really bothered me at the time. IIRC, he was looked on as captain material, but the Flames foolishly left him unprotected in the expansion draft and lost him. If he had stayed with the Flames for the next few years this vote might not be such an easy win for Gilmour.
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 05:57 PM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Yeah, cash was a big factor. Flames were top 3 or 4 in salary in 1989, and most of that carried over to 1990. The house cleaning then was too severe after losing to the Kings to shed salary and expenses, and it made Fletcher bolt for TO the next year.
Gilmour on his way out was not a shock, either the papers or talk radio at the time were on about it for a few weeks because he wanted 1m$ a year, a big raise. I was at the NYE game where he got a star (1st?) and recall thinking if this was the last time we had seen him..it was. He wanted huge money for one reason or another. I also heard a few things in the years after that time, that he was not doing any favours to the Flames executives with his off ice behavioir around town.
Verbeek would've been intriguing but he was a sour puss wherever he went too, so not sure if his performance would've been as expected. The trade was hung on Leeman having a 50 goal season two years prior, and trending to about 140 goals over the past 3 seasons.
Recall hearing about the trade on the way to Banff for a short family holiday. Peter Maher was putting a pretty good spin on it Iirc.
|
|
|
05-04-2020, 10:07 PM
|
#39
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
|
It doesn't matter what anyone says, controversies, bad trades with the Leafs, whatever.
Gilmour wins this in a landslide. And as much as Leafs fans lionize hm, he only won one Stanley Cup. (Scored the GWG, in fact.)
I type this under the watchful eye of this photo, one that I picked up for a pittance somewhere along the way.
Last edited by drewtastic; 05-04-2020 at 10:12 PM.
|
|
|
05-05-2020, 04:02 AM
|
#40
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Farther away from the Dome than I'd like
|
Those gloves, Ferkland, or whatever their name is
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jessnuts For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.
|
|