Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2020, 12:01 PM   #5081
accord1999
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
WTI is up, but WCS is still getting hammered.

https://oilprice.com/oil-price-charts
BNN Bloomberg has WCS price that seems to be more up to date.


https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/oil
accord1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to accord1999 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2020, 10:54 AM   #5082
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_eoj View Post
Marginal cost of production is much higher today.
Yup, and that correlates directly the the energy intensity of marginal barrels today vs. then.

For every marginal barrel today, we are using significantly more energy to acquire it, thus making the net energy provided to the world of a produced barrel of oil lower than it was in that era.

Oil is effectively becoming less energy dense.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2020, 11:02 AM   #5083
crazy_eoj
Powerplay Quarterback
 
crazy_eoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bumface View Post
Yup, and that correlates directly the the energy intensity of marginal barrels today vs. then.

For every marginal barrel today, we are using significantly more energy to acquire it, thus making the net energy provided to the world of a produced barrel of oil lower than it was in that era.

Oil is effectively becoming less energy dense.
While this is somewhat true, I think the much larger impact in Alberta in particular is increased taxes, fees, royalties, regulatory requirements, egress costs, etc. It all adds up.
crazy_eoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2020, 12:22 PM   #5084
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_eoj View Post
While this is somewhat true, I think the much larger impact in Alberta in particular is increased taxes, fees, royalties, regulatory requirements, egress costs, etc. It all adds up.
I would beg to differ.

Canada Oil and gas barrel production Cost, March 2016:

Gross taxes: $2.48
Capital spending: $9.69
Production costs: $11.56

Admin transport: $2.92
Total: $26.64

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_of_oil

Yes, old numbers, but the bulk of the costs are in extraction and production, which are very energy intensive.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2020, 01:32 PM   #5085
crazy_eoj
Powerplay Quarterback
 
crazy_eoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bumface View Post
I would beg to differ.

Canada Oil and gas barrel production Cost, March 2016:

Gross taxes: $2.48
Capital spending: $9.69
Production costs: $11.56

Admin transport: $2.92
Total: $26.64

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_of_oil

Yes, old numbers, but the bulk of the costs are in extraction and production, which are very energy intensive.
Can't see any details of how they calculated those numbers, but I would assume a large portion of "production costs" may include what I was referencing in my previous post.

And regardless, aren't we are talking about the net increase in the proportion of these costs from 1999?
crazy_eoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2020, 01:36 PM   #5086
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_eoj View Post
Can't see any details of how they calculated those numbers, but I would assume a large portion of "production costs" may include what I was referencing in my previous post.

And regardless, aren't we are talking about the net increase in the proportion of these costs from 1999?
I think those costs are included for sure, I just highly doubt they are the majority of any of the other sub-categories.

And yes, the point I was trying to make is that a marginal barrel now is a lot more energy intensive than in 1999, globally.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2020, 01:41 PM   #5087
crazy_eoj
Powerplay Quarterback
 
crazy_eoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bumface View Post
I think those costs are included for sure, I just highly doubt they are the majority of any of the other sub-categories.

And yes, the point I was trying to make is that a marginal barrel now is a lot more energy intensive than in 1999, globally.
Right I agree with that for sure.

I think my point was that Alberta, in particular, has seen a larger increase in the other costs versus competing jurisdictions which explains why you see the 'panic' from many of the domestic companies with the price drop.

Especially if you separate out oilsands which is really an outlier in many ways anyways.
crazy_eoj is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to crazy_eoj For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2020, 01:50 PM   #5088
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Ah, I understand now, thanks!

Look at us, having a slight misunderstanding on the internet and not even insulting each other's mothers or bringing up Hitler on our way to resolution.

Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2020, 02:24 PM   #5089
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bumface View Post
I think those costs are included for sure, I just highly doubt they are the majority of any of the other sub-categories.

And yes, the point I was trying to make is that a marginal barrel now is a lot more energy intensive than in 1999, globally.
This is generally true globally, and acutely true in Alberta as our average barrel continues to weigh towards oilsands production.

Not only does it take more energy to surface that barrel, the energy content of the crude is lower than conventional light options.

The average barrel of oil put towards oil exploration in 1950 would yield somewhere between 50 - 100 barrels of useful output. Today, it is more like 10 - 20. In Alberta it is closer to 6. This is NOT a curve that reverses, and it is NOT a linear decline. This is in line with resources like Wind.

Dissipative systems like human civilization require a lot of energy to maintain, even more to grow or improve. The excess energy supplied by it's fuel sources go towards that build out. If more energy has to go towards energy collection, that is LESS available for everything else.

Modern industrialized civilizations require an energy return rate around 15. Any sources less than that require energetic subsidization from more abundant supplies. Oil is very much at the cusp of that reality and the oilsands are the perfect example - they are subsidized by natural gas.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to SeeGeeWhy For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2020, 02:56 PM   #5090
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeGeeWhy View Post
This is generally true globally, and acutely true in Alberta as our average barrel continues to weigh towards oilsands production.

Not only does it take more energy to surface that barrel, the energy content of the crude is lower than conventional light options.

The average barrel of oil put towards oil exploration in 1950 would yield somewhere between 50 - 100 barrels of useful output. Today, it is more like 10 - 20. In Alberta it is closer to 6. This is NOT a curve that reverses, and it is NOT a linear decline. This is in line with resources like Wind.

Dissipative systems like human civilization require a lot of energy to maintain, even more to grow or improve. The excess energy supplied by it's fuel sources go towards that build out. If more energy has to go towards energy collection, that is LESS available for everything else.

Modern industrialized civilizations require an energy return rate around 15. Any sources less than that require energetic subsidization from more abundant supplies. Oil is very much at the cusp of that reality and the oilsands are the perfect example - they are subsidized by natural gas.
wonderful post
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
Old 03-18-2020, 12:46 PM   #5091
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

I think a double-meat sub is more expensive than a barrel of WCS ($7.47) at this point. Desperate times.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 03-18-2020, 12:50 PM   #5092
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
I think a double-meat sub is more expensive than a barrel of WCS ($7.47) at this point. Desperate times.
The price could go negative in AB once the tanks fill. Companies need to rapidly shut in production, we are way below cost here.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 12:51 PM   #5093
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
I think a double-meat sub is more expensive than a barrel of WCS ($7.47) at this point. Desperate times.
Amazing that an entire barrel of oil is cheaper than 8L of milk.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:07 PM   #5094
Envitro
First Line Centre
 
Envitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saddledome, Calgary
Exp:
Default

I see a conflict / attack in Saudi Arabia at oil infrastructure in the near future
Envitro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:10 PM   #5095
Tacopuck
Scoring Winger
 
Tacopuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

North America needs to temporarily ban the importation of foreign oil. CAN/USA/MEX can still export / import between each other.
__________________
Purveyor of fine Sarcasm
Tacopuck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tacopuck For This Useful Post:
Old 03-18-2020, 01:11 PM   #5096
Envitro
First Line Centre
 
Envitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saddledome, Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacopuck View Post
North America needs to temporarily ban the importation of foreign oil. CAN/USA/MEX can still export / import between each other.
This, exactly, is what is needed. We need to also be repurposing existing pipe and constructing new pipelines to support this.
Envitro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:11 PM   #5097
Mayo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envitro View Post
I see a conflict / attack in Saudi Arabia at oil infrastructure in the near future
Should be at Houston for recklessly expanding and putting us into this position - or the banks that allowed them to do it
Mayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:12 PM   #5098
Khel
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Khel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacopuck View Post
North America needs to temporarily ban the importation of foreign oil. CAN/USA/MEX can still export / import between each other.
I was thinking this this morning, I'm not in O&G, is this even feasible?
Khel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:13 PM   #5099
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

It's not going to matter. So much oil is going to flood the no-demand market in the next weeks/months that that resulting glut will suppress prices for years.

It's over.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 01:14 PM   #5100
Mayo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khel View Post
I was thinking this this morning, I'm not in O&G, is this even feasible?
Don't think it would work - too much complexity with downstream business - and too much oil produced between the 3 countries
Mayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy