Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: If you could vote on Super Tuesday who would you vote for?
Joe Biden 35 16.43%
Michael Bloomberg 14 6.57%
Pete Buttigieg 18 8.45%
Amy Klobucher 9 4.23%
Bernie Sanders 102 47.89%
Elizabeth Warren 23 10.80%
Other 12 5.63%
Voters: 213. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-02-2020, 02:26 PM   #1661
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

There’s a better chance of choosing Abrams and Georgia’s 16 electoral votes over Minnesota’s paltry 10. Nevermind that Minnesota is probably going blue anyway.

I’ve said it before I’m kind of pumped to see how the establishment screws this one up. Biden/Klobuchar would be super interesting in that regard. Same as adding Pete to the ticket.
ResAlien is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ResAlien For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2020, 02:30 PM   #1662
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
If Sanders leads going into a brokered convention, there will be some heavy wrangling over who he chooses as his running-mate. I expect the party will trade their approval of Sanders for his acquiescing in taking a moderate as his running-mate. Klobuchar would tick a lot of boxes as a woman, a moderate, and someone who could lock up Minnesota and boost a ticket in the Midwest.
I know that 538 has the odds of a brokered convention very high still, but it seems quite unlikely now with Pete and Amy dropping out. I suspect that Bloomberg and Warren won't pick up a significant amount of delegates tomorrow and will likely not continue. Unless, it is a razor thin margin the rest of the way, I suspect one of Bernie or Joe will have a majority going into the convention.
nfotiu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 02:31 PM   #1663
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
If Sanders leads going into a brokered convention, there will be some heavy wrangling over who he chooses as his running-mate. I expect the party will trade their approval of Sanders for his acquiescing in taking a moderate as his running-mate. Klobuchar would tick a lot of boxes as a woman, a moderate, and someone who could lock up Minnesota and boost a ticket in the Midwest.

Warren: make me VP or else.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 02:42 PM   #1664
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
I know that 538 has the odds of a brokered convention very high still, but it seems quite unlikely now with Pete and Amy dropping out. I suspect that Bloomberg and Warren won't pick up a significant amount of delegates tomorrow and will likely not continue. Unless, it is a razor thin margin the rest of the way, I suspect one of Bernie or Joe will have a majority going into the convention.
The 538 logic is that Pete and Amy dropping out actually make a brokered convention more likely. There are a lot of states where Warren and Bloomberg, and it some cases, Biden, are polling a little below 15%. 15% is critical, because in many states it's an all-or-nothing threshold you need to reach to get delegates.
To give you an extreme example, if you had a state where Sanders was polling at 48%, Buttigieg, Warren, Biden, Bloomberg all at 13%, Sanders would potentially get 100% of the delegates*. But if Buttigieg drops out, and his voters are split roughly evenly between the other four, then Sanders comes out of it with more in the ballpark of 50% of the delegates, and the other three would each get around 15% each. Basically, the more states where more candidates are able to hit 15%, the more likely there's a brokered convention.

*This 15% percent rule is applied both at the state and precinct level so it's a little more complicated than this simplification.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to octothorp For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2020, 03:06 PM   #1665
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp View Post
The 538 logic is that Pete and Amy dropping out actually make a brokered convention more likely. There are a lot of states where Warren and Bloomberg, and it some cases, Biden, are polling a little below 15%. 15% is critical, because in many states it's an all-or-nothing threshold you need to reach to get delegates.
To give you an extreme example, if you had a state where Sanders was polling at 48%, Buttigieg, Warren, Biden, Bloomberg all at 13%, Sanders would potentially get 100% of the delegates*. But if Buttigieg drops out, and his voters are split roughly evenly between the other four, then Sanders comes out of it with more in the ballpark of 50% of the delegates, and the other three would each get around 15% each. Basically, the more states where more candidates are able to hit 15%, the more likely there's a brokered convention.

*This 15% percent rule is applied both at the state and precinct level so it's a little more complicated than this simplification.
I'm not really buying that explanation

There's only been 155 delegates determine so far, and 33 went to Amy and Pete that basically dead delegates now. 8 have gone to Warren which are all but dead. So say 41 dead delegates now. How many are Warren and Bloomberg really going to get tomorrow? More than 50-100 combined? Say they get 100 combined, and drop out after tomorrow. That's at most 150 dead delegates.

Once it becomes a 2 person race after Tuesday, it's going to have to end up a very tight 1990-1840 race or tighter for one of them not to have a majority. If either has a margin bigger than the dead delegates, they'll get a majority.

The 538 model must have Bloomberg and Warren continuing to pick up significant delegates going forward, and I just don't see that happening.
nfotiu is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2020, 03:45 PM   #1666
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Poor Amy, the science was on her side.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 05:29 PM   #1667
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

For the people that chose Bloomberg in the poll, a serious question: why?
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 05:36 PM   #1668
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
I'm not really buying that explanation

There's only been 155 delegates determine so far, and 33 went to Amy and Pete that basically dead delegates now. 8 have gone to Warren which are all but dead. So say 41 dead delegates now. How many are Warren and Bloomberg really going to get tomorrow? More than 50-100 combined? Say they get 100 combined, and drop out after tomorrow. That's at most 150 dead delegates.

Once it becomes a 2 person race after Tuesday, it's going to have to end up a very tight 1990-1840 race or tighter for one of them not to have a majority. If either has a margin bigger than the dead delegates, they'll get a majority.

The 538 model must have Bloomberg and Warren continuing to pick up significant delegates going forward, and I just don't see that happening.
You assume that Warren and Bloomberg drop out. The 538 model does not.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 05:36 PM   #1669
Canadianman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
For the people that chose Bloomberg in the poll, a serious question: why?
He's the perfect choice for someone who looks at Trump's record and thinks to himself "I like him, but I wish he had more women accusing him of harassment or assault"
Canadianman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canadianman For This Useful Post:
Old 03-02-2020, 05:37 PM   #1670
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I guess neither side would go for a Biden/Sanders ticket would they...
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 05:56 PM   #1671
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
I guess neither side would go for a Biden/Sanders ticket would they...
Does David Ayres get to be president if neither of them make it 4 years?
nfotiu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 06:13 PM   #1672
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
For the people that chose Bloomberg in the poll, a serious question: why?
I caught a bit of a press conference/convention of Bloomberg's today and it was the most boring and painful thing to watch. He is so boring and monotone. I just don't see how anyone could get excited about him leading the way. I don't doubt that Bloomberg is a smart guy and good businessman but he seems like a terrible politician. I honestly don't really know much about his history as mayor as I didn't follow NY politics at that time.
calgarygeologist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 06:27 PM   #1673
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Score one for Bernie Bros.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1234630241198518273
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 06:29 PM   #1674
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
I caught a bit of a press conference/convention of Bloomberg's today and it was the most boring and painful thing to watch. He is so boring and monotone. I just don't see how anyone could get excited about him leading the way. I don't doubt that Bloomberg is a smart guy and good businessman but he seems like a terrible politician. I honestly don't really know much about his history as mayor as I didn't follow NY politics at that time.
If you are mayor between Guiliani and DeBlasio you will look good.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 09:04 PM   #1675
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Whoever the running-mate is, it will be a person of colour.
driveway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2020, 11:50 PM   #1676
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driveway View Post
Whoever the running-mate is, it will be a person of colour.
For Biden? he pretty well has that demographic locked up, a Progressive woman is more use to him
afc wimbledon is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2020, 07:58 AM   #1677
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Nah, neither of those things should be the focus, that doesn't win swing states in a general. But it might be both anyway, because Abrams.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2020, 08:04 AM   #1678
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Funny, that after the wild ride through the first 4 states, 538's forecast is basically back where it was before the voting began.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...ex_cid=rrpromo
nfotiu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2020, 08:35 AM   #1679
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Democrats paint themselves into a corner when the VP choice has to be this or that.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2020, 08:50 AM   #1680
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

How are Republicans any different in that regard? Trump had to pick Pence and not Ivanka or Vince McMahon because he needed a solid Christian right/base guy. Romney had to pick Ryan because he was a tea party Republican. McCain had to pick Palin to lock up the bat#### wing. Cheney had to pick Bush because someone had to be the front guy with name value.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy