02-21-2020, 09:41 PM
|
#61
|
Scoring Winger
|
After 30 seconds of thought, next game I'd start with:
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Ryan
Tkachuk-Backlund-Mangiapane
Lucic-Bennett-Dube
Jankowski-Monahan-Rieder
Just get Monahan to start competing. 5 games in a row of skating hard to loose pucks and grinding in the corners before he'd get a sniff of top line minutes again.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kovaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:41 PM
|
#62
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamenspiel
Na, Flames were not that bad. They are missing their two best defencemen and the Bruins are a great team. Sam Bennett totally outclassed Ryan as a third line centre. That line almost singlehandedly brought the Flames back into it. I wonder what Ryan would get us in a trade, maybe a couple of picks.
|
TBF, Ryan played sick.
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:41 PM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilliwack, B.C
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpete
Maybe I just wasnt being very observant but did Lindholm even touch the puck tonight? I hardly remember hearing his name.
|
He assisted on Johnny's goal
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:42 PM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
|
It was the Bruins. Great coach. Determined, dedicated players that don't give up. Pleased with the pushback. For fricks sake, stop switching everything around, coach.
Know why the Bruins are so good? The coach puts the players together and let's them figure it out. Bergeron is a very, very special player.
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:42 PM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
|
This loss was a much, MUCH better effort than a lot of their wins of late.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Karl For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:42 PM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamenspiel
Na, Flames were not that bad. They are missing their two best defencemen and the Bruins are a great team. Sam Bennett totally outclassed Ryan as a third line centre. That line almost singlehandedly brought the Flames back into it. I wonder what Ryan would get us in a trade, maybe a couple of picks.
|
Ryan’s been a much better player, at both ends of the ice, than Sam.
Since he got here.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to timbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:42 PM
|
#67
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
When Chucky is off, he's one of our worst players with all his unnecessarily fancy passes to the other team. Terrible choices with the puck all night.
Felt like he and Hanifin killed the finally 1:30 by themselves.
Johnny had a great game, yet had 0 shots on 2 breakaways. There's the game right there unfortunately.
|
I think he's feeling the pressure of literally having to be the one to do it all on our team.
The last 4 weeks, he's added the role of fighting to energize the team to his repertoire on top of everything else he does and he still has points in 11 of his last 12 games.
Definitely a poor game for him but he's one of the few trying to do whatever he can to help the team
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:43 PM
|
#68
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Flames owned the 3rd against the league's best team in a one-goal game. It was a great effort and they deserved better. Some of the moaning here is absurd. And yes, Monahan was invisble, but Bergeron has that effect on the best of them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User
I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again 
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BigRed For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:44 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggy_12
The last 90 seconds gave me a headache. No structure or gameplan, just 6 skaters moving around at random.
|
Why even bother taking a timeout... oh wait, they didnt?
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:44 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
Not sure how anyone can consider a game where the Flames were out-shot 23-18, out-chanced 21-17, out-high danger chanced 9-5 and had an xGF% of 41.62% 5v5 a "good game" just because it was against the best team in the NHL.
I guess the positive to that is the majority of us are recognizing the Flames don't have even close to what it takes to make any noise in the Playoffs and are happy with poor play like this.
|
Probably because they lost by a goal and led a couple times. Talbot wasn't spectacular either.
Stats have their place, but there is more to it than just that.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:44 PM
|
#71
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Erie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
Gaudreau was buzzing all night. That’s a positive. Don’t know what has happened to Monahan. Not confident at all
|
I think he still looks tentative, he's checking everything out before he commits to anything. Is he hurt, scared, what?
__________________
Go Flames Go!
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:45 PM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
Not sure how anyone can consider a game where the Flames were out-shot 23-18, out-chanced 21-17, out-high danger chanced 9-5 and had an xGF% of 41.62% 5v5 a "good game" just because it was against the best team in the NHL.
I guess the positive to that is the majority of us are recognizing the Flames don't have even close to what it takes to make any noise in the Playoffs and are happy with poor play like this.
|
What do you want us all to cry? Flames missing half their top 4 D played a decent game against the leagues top team. It is what it is, difference in the game was a bounce or two
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:45 PM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryred
Unless Flames win it gets pretty dark in here at times. I agree after the 1st I thought Flames were going to get killed but they shut down the Bruins shots on goal pretty good and turned it up in the 3rd.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
|
Sigh, it gets dark sometimes even when Flames win.
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:45 PM
|
#74
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRed
Flames owned the 3rd against the league's best team in a one-goal game. It was a great effort and they deserved better. Some of the moaning here is absurd. And yes, Monahan was invisble, but Bergeron has that effect on the best of them.
|
I read: "they tried really hard but the other teams players are better then ours."
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:46 PM
|
#75
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
|
They gave a solid effort.That's all I've ever asked. I can't be mad at this game. Ward had them ready to play a full 60 minutes. If one of those weird bounces went the Flames way then they win. They would beat most teams on any given night with that effort.
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:46 PM
|
#76
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Most of the stat differential likely occurred in the first period. They played the best team in the league pretty even the second and third. They are playing with three defencemen who wouldn’t be in the lineup if the Flames were healthy. They had a lot of effort. That’s why it was a good game.
|
You are correct. The Flames were very even with the Bruins the final 40 and arguably outplayed them, but overall they were still outplayed and didn't come away with a point.
The Oilers were without the best player in the world and their #1 defenseman but still escaped with a point.
The Flames have had a lot of luck over the years in terms of injuries and have barely moved in the standings since the injuries struck so using that as an excuse isn't that valid
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:47 PM
|
#77
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau
I read: "they tried really hard but the other teams players are better then ours."
|
is that honestly so bad?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:47 PM
|
#78
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saint Troy
Nonsense, he’s the only guy that consistently gives a F on this team.
|
Sure, but to what end?
I liked his fight, but did he do anything offensively? Only time I noticed him with the puck was when he was turning it over to a Bruin, or passing it away when he had the puck in the slot with a good chance to shoot.
Chucky is probably my favourite Flame, but he's now our highest paid player and seems to only show up for half the games lately.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:48 PM
|
#79
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
is that honestly so bad?
|
Dude, you're the king of 'is it so bad?'. Sit this one out.
|
|
|
02-21-2020, 09:48 PM
|
#80
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81MC
I must be a total homer, I thought that was a pretty close game? Bruins had the edge for half of the first, otherwise I thought the flames played pretty well. Let’s not forget, Boston is looking like Cup favourites right now. Not sure the flames loooked anywhere near as bad as some make it sound.
|
They gave it a good fight, for sure. They lost the game because they took their foot off the gas after Boston made it 3-2, and then the Bruins completely took over for a while. Flames didn't really start pushing again until late in the 2nd. Then I thought they dominated most of the 3rd, but just couldn't find the back of the net.
Inconsistency is still the Flames' biggest issue and has been for a while now. Not sure what the fix is, but I think an experienced motivational coach would certainly help.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 AM.
|
|