11-10-2019, 02:37 PM
|
#281
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski
Do you think the roster is being optimized at forward as well (based on last games lines)?
|
Personally, I don't know what to make of the forward lines right now.
I think Gaudreau and Monahan are great together, despite them not being off to a great start this year.
Tkachuk deserves better line-mates, whatever shape that should take.
Backlund and Frolik were good together, which simplified things. But Frolik has been no good this year, so that's out the window and something needs to change there.
We need someone else to take a step forward, whether it's Bennett, Mangiapane, Dube, or whoever. We need another guy to become a legit top 6 guy.
For me, a guy like Toffoli would be a great addition at a reasonable price:
Gaudreau - Monahan - Toffoli
Tkachuk - Backlund - Lindholm
Mangiapane - Ryan - Bennett
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 02:43 PM
|
#282
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
Toffoli also had time with Monahan in juniors so there could be some former chemistry there and it would give us two RH shots in the top 6 which would be pretty awesome.
Brodie + Jankowski for Toffoli?? Do we need to add a pick or prospect?
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 02:44 PM
|
#283
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack
Toffoli also had time with Monahan in juniors so there could be some former chemistry there and it would give us two RH shots in the top 6 which would be pretty awesome.
Brodie + Jankowski for Toffoli?? Do we need to add a pick or prospect?
|
Why would the Kings want a rental player like Brodie? They will want draft picks and prospects and there is neither of those in your proposal.
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 02:49 PM
|
#284
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
Which is why I asked what would need to be added... what would you add that would make it fair? How about if we switched Janks to Dube? Also LA is extremely weak on D so adding a guy like Brodie to the mix might actually lead to an extension and if not they could always flip him at the deadline for more futures.
Brodie + Dube + 2nd for Toffoli ?? Is that better?
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 02:51 PM
|
#285
|
Franchise Player
|
Toffoli is a pending UFA as well. And salar has to go back to make the deal work.
Toffoli for Frolik + 2nd + 4th
Or does it require a 1st? (I don't think so, considering how much Toffoli's production has slipped)
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 02:52 PM
|
#286
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack
Which is why I asked what would need to be added... what would you add that would make it fair? How about if we switched Janks to Dube? Also LA is extremely weak on D so adding a guy like Brodie to the mix might actually lead to an extension and if not they could always flip him at the deadline for more futures.
Brodie + Dube + 2nd for Toffoli ?? Is that better?
|
IMO, Brodie and Toffoli have very similar value
Dube + 2nd is more than I would want to pay, never mind giving up Brodie as well.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-10-2019, 03:06 PM
|
#287
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
IMO, Brodie and Toffoli have very similar value
Dube + 2nd is more than I would want to pay, never mind giving up Brodie as well.
|
Was responding to EE who clearly feels opposite of how you feel about value. Personally I think Brodie + Jankowski + 2nd could get it done and would be fair value and I’d be happy to pay that price. I’d try and turn a retained Frolik into some more defensive depth and still be open to trading for a big name to go all in at the deadline if they were in a good position to do so.
I just feel like if we could bolster the team’s top 6 this year we could really go for a run and if it didn’t work out we would have tradeable assets to deal in another season from now that could recoup what we would spend this year.
Brodie + Janks + 2nd for Toffoli
Frolik 1/4 retained for TVR
Valimaki + 1st + Czarnik for T. Hall (very comparable offer to what landed Stone arguably better IMO)
Gaudreau - Monahan - Toffoli
Hall - Lindholm - Tkachuk
Mangiapane - Backlund - Bennett
Lucic - Ryan - Reider
Quine
Giordano - Hamonic
Hanifin - Andersson
Kylington - TVR
Stone
Rittich
Talbot
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 03:08 PM
|
#288
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
It's a centre problem imo.
There is no other legitimate option for ANY coach other than to keep gaudreau and Monahan together.
Tkachuk works on line 2 with Backlund because he doesn't leave him high and dry. Tkachuk wants to make the same defensive reads and plays on the defensive zone as backline and frolik do. That's the essence of their chemistry together and why they are so good at outchancing their opponents even though they are relatively under skilled.
You HAVE to play gaudreau and moanahan together because splitting them up means having to elevate a player like Bennett or mangiapane to 17-19 minutes a night and those guys can't handle those kinds of minutes without burning you.
Playing gaudreau with backlund just isn't an option in my mind, neither player is going to play to their potential and you're going to really neuter their individual strengths to the team makeup.
It's why I brought up the centre comparison, having good centres helps you build your roster easier than having good wingers.
Their top winger was point per game this year before going out of the lineup, but the team can keep going because their centres can drive the bus. What do the flames look like with a tkachuk or gaudreau injury?
Since tarasenko went down O'Reilly has 11 points in 8 games and Schenn has 5 in his last 8.
Monahan is already getting filled in terms of fancy stats, imagine life without gaudreau.
Having good centres just gives you so much more flexibility than having to work around 2 guys with big, opposite, holes in their games.
Imo, that's what has to give.
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 03:13 PM
|
#289
|
Franchise Player
|
Another C would be ideal for sure. But Cs are very hard to come by, and we don't have a lot of assets to spare.
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 03:14 PM
|
#290
|
Franchise Player
|
If you're going to dump Frolik on them, which you pretty much have to do for salary purposes, I think it would take more than a 2nd and a 4th.
Sad that Frolik dropped off so far the last couple seasons.
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 03:18 PM
|
#291
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
|
I can’t believe the amount of negativity after last night. Rallied from down by two to get a point from an extremely tough opponent. Could’ve easily gotten 2 points with a little more execution and puck luck in OT but it just wasn’t in the cards. Sucks to lose but even if we replicate last years great regular season, we’re going to lose at least 22 more games. If CP is going to be this miserable after every loss this place will be unbearable.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MisterJoji For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-10-2019, 04:39 PM
|
#292
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
That was a fun game. Probably the most entertaining of the HNIC games I have managed to watch this year. The Blues are an excellent team and the Flames played them close. The difference was the bad start leading to the first goal, the lack of discipline leading to the 2nd and 3rd goals, and the lack of execution to finish one more chance. If the Flames can figure that out and add some goal scoring at the deadline they are just as legitimate a cup contender as the Blues are.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 04:43 PM
|
#293
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack
Toffoli also had time with Monahan in juniors so there could be some former chemistry there and it would give us two RH shots in the top 6 which would be pretty awesome.
Brodie + Jankowski for Toffoli?? Do we need to add a pick or prospect?
|
More ridiculous undervaluing of Brodie.
Brodie had 34 points last year, guess how many Toffoli had? Yup 34 points.
Who plays the more prominent position?
The Kings don’t need Brodie cause he is a UFA but if they did, THEY are the ones who have to add.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post:
|
Calgary4LIfe,
DazzlinDino,
DeluxeMoustache,
Flames Draft Watcher,
Funkhouser,
GranteedEV,
Psytic,
Redrum,
Roof-Daddy,
savardandjokinen,
Steve Bozek,
TheScorpion
|
11-10-2019, 06:16 PM
|
#294
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
I can’t believe the amount of negativity after last night. Rallied from down by two to get a point from an extremely tough opponent. Could’ve easily gotten 2 points with a little more execution and puck luck in OT but it just wasn’t in the cards. Sucks to lose but even if we replicate last years great regular season, we’re going to lose at least 22 more games. If CP is going to be this miserable after every loss this place will be unbearable.
|
It’s the fact that 20 games in we are a 0.500 team(a loss is a loss) and played like trash for most of those games. If we want to make the playoffs we need to be way better.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dragomir For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-10-2019, 06:26 PM
|
#295
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragomir
It’s the fact that 20 games in we are a 0.500 team(a loss is a loss) and played like trash for most of those games. If we want to make the playoffs we need to be way better.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Can you please add more hyperbole to the nonsense you are spouting...Flames are on track for 94 points. Not a great start...but surely you don't believe that making up 2 points to reach the proverbial 96 points is needing to be "way better".
__________________
Go Flames Go
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tkflames For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-10-2019, 06:28 PM
|
#296
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Kings would laugh to the bank if we traded Brodie for Toffoli. He hasnt been good in awhile and is still living off his 2016 season glory.
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 06:33 PM
|
#297
|
Franchise Player
|
Toffoli is fast, pretty big, a right-shot RW, can play along the boards, and can score. He is potentially exactly what the top line needs (if you want to put Lindholm with Tkachuk so that Chucky has some talent to play with, and to create a legit 2nd scoring line.
And he wouldn't cost a fortune (though I wouldn't want to trade Brodie either)
|
|
|
11-10-2019, 06:34 PM
|
#298
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames
Can you please add more hyperbole to the nonsense you are spouting...Flames are on track for 94 points. Not a great start...but surely you don't believe that making up 2 points to reach the proverbial 96 points is needing to be "way better".
|
Lol you fail to see my point, this record flatters us, the way the Flames have played they deserve 5-6 wins at most. If we don’t start playing better our luck will soon run out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dragomir For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-10-2019, 06:36 PM
|
#299
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragomir
Lol you fail to see my point, this record flatters us, the way the Flames have played they deserve 5-6 wins at most. If we don’t start playing better our luck will soon run out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
You failed to make your point. And followed up with more hyperbole.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-10-2019, 06:37 PM
|
#300
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Toffoli is fast, pretty big, a right-shot RW, can play along the boards, and can score. He is potentially exactly what the top line needs (if you want to put Lindholm with Tkachuk so that Chucky has some talent to play with, and to create a legit 2nd scoring line.
And he wouldn't cost a fortune (though I wouldn't want to trade Brodie either)
|
They can have Frolik and a pick. Brodies worth a lot more than Toffoli.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Psytic For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM.
|
|