Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2019, 03:22 PM   #41
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
I assume that at the end of the season, they'll figure out how much he made in total combined between the NHL and AHL (assuming he gets some time in the NHL). If it's less than his guarantee, he'll get a cheque to top him up. If the total is at least the minimum, he'll get nothing extra.


I would guess it's mostly psychological by helping the player feel like he got a win in the negotiations.

Also, when the time comes to recall a player, the GM might look at the numbers and think, "we're already paying this guy as if he's going to play a couple of weeks in the NHL anyway, so we might as well recall him", rather than recalling a different AHLer who doesn't have the guaranteed money.


If my math is right, I believe Rinaldo could spend up to 18 days in the NHL over the course of the season without it costing the Flames any extra money because of the guaranteed minimum.
Not sure that your math is right.

With a 180 day season, I calculate it to be 26 days. If it's 182 days (I just took a quick look and that is what it seems, but I'm not sure), I still get 26 games.

Last edited by Enoch Root; 09-29-2019 at 03:24 PM.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2019, 03:41 PM   #42
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Not sure that your math is right.

With a 180 day season, I calculate it to be 26 days. If it's 182 days (I just took a quick look and that is what it seems, but I'm not sure), I still get 26 games.

I get 17 days, not that it really matters.



Spoiler!
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2019, 03:50 PM   #43
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Not sure that your math is right.

With a 180 day season, I calculate it to be 26 days. If it's 182 days (I just took a quick look and that is what it seems, but I'm not sure), I get 27 games.
The season is 186 days long.


This is how I did the math:
  • NHL Salary = N
  • AHL Salary = A
  • Minimum Guaranteed Salary = M
  • Percentage of the Season spent in the NHL = P
  • Percentage of the Season spent in the AHL = 1-P

A player's total compensation is the amount earned in the NHL plus the amount earned in the AHL.
NP + A(1-P) = Total Compensation


To find the maximum percentage of the season that can be spent in the NHL for "free", we substitute in M for the Total Compensation. We can simplify the equation like so...
NP + A(1-P) = M
NP + A - AP = M
NP - AP = M - A
P(N - A) = M - A
P = (M - A) / (N - A)
Substitute in Rinaldo's actual numbers and solve for P: M=$225,000, N=$700,000, and A=$175,000 ...
P = (225-175)/(700-175) = 50/525 = 0.0952 = 9.52%

That means he can spend 9.52% of the season in the NHL (17.71 days) and make the same as his minimum guaranteed salary.




To check our work, plug the numbers back in to the equation and solve for M:
700,000(0.0952) + 175,000(1-0.0952) = 66,666.67 + 158,333.33 = $225,000.


EDIT: gvitaly, different method, same result.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!

Last edited by getbak; 09-29-2019 at 03:52 PM.
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2019, 04:38 PM   #44
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I looked at my methodology over and over and couldn't see anything wrong with it.

Until I finally noticed that my target was $250k instead of $225K

So yeah, 17 days
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2019, 04:50 PM   #45
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F View Post
I hated him his whole career.

Now I will love him.

I still don't like him.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2019, 07:50 PM   #46
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Not sure why people call him a goon - he is not going to scare anyone.


What he will add when he is in the lineup is speed and hits, and he seems to be pretty good on the forecheck too. When facing a bigger and more physical team, I have zero issues with calling him up and getting his energy in the lineup. Flames seem to have issues with the bigger and more physical teams consistently, and I do think having a guy out there who is known for big hits will help them if the games become chippy, as it allows the Flames to play a bit differently and still be successful.


With that being said, I hope he doesn't do anything across the line when he puts on that Flaming C. I detest this type of player. Play physical and help this team win? I will love you. Cross that line and make an ugly hit to a vulnerable player? I will hate you and I will be embarrassed that you dress for the team I cheer for.


All in all, a good, practically zero-risk signing that can help fill in a hole. Stockton will probably still have to sign an outright enforcer, however, as they are still common, and Rinaldo is not that.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2019, 08:40 PM   #47
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

So the Flames sign Zac Rinaldo, but then Ryan Lomberg gets 5 points in 1 night (so far) for the heat.

It's nice to know there are options.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2019, 08:45 PM   #48
nwflamesfan
First Line Centre
 
nwflamesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Port Moody BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
So the Flames sign Zac Rinaldo, but then Ryan Lomberg gets 5 points in 1 night (so far) for the heat.

It's nice to know there are options.
He just got a empty netter for 6
__________________

nwflamesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 01:14 AM   #49
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Not sure why people call him a goon - he is not going to scare anyone.


What he will add when he is in the lineup is speed and hits, and he seems to be pretty good on the forecheck too. When facing a bigger and more physical team, I have zero issues with calling him up and getting his energy in the lineup. Flames seem to have issues with the bigger and more physical teams consistently, and I do think having a guy out there who is known for big hits will help them if the games become chippy, as it allows the Flames to play a bit differently and still be successful.


With that being said, I hope he doesn't do anything across the line when he puts on that Flaming C. I detest this type of player. Play physical and help this team win? I will love you. Cross that line and make an ugly hit to a vulnerable player? I will hate you and I will be embarrassed that you dress for the team I cheer for.


All in all, a good, practically zero-risk signing that can help fill in a hole. Stockton will probably still have to sign an outright enforcer, however, as they are still common, and Rinaldo is not that.
That’s the only reason most people know him
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 09:28 AM   #50
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Perfect. Free depth upgrade on Lomberg.

He's another nuclear option we can deploy if need be.
Really "nuclear" ??

Will putting him in the Flames lineup force any NHL team to dress an extra tough guy?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2019, 09:42 AM   #51
smiggy77
Powerplay Quarterback
 
smiggy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
The season is 186 days long.


This is how I did the math:
  • NHL Salary = N
  • AHL Salary = A
  • Minimum Guaranteed Salary = M
  • Percentage of the Season spent in the NHL = P
  • Percentage of the Season spent in the AHL = 1-P

A player's total compensation is the amount earned in the NHL plus the amount earned in the AHL.
NP + A(1-P) = Total Compensation


To find the maximum percentage of the season that can be spent in the NHL for "free", we substitute in M for the Total Compensation. We can simplify the equation like so...
NP + A(1-P) = M
NP + A - AP = M
NP - AP = M - A
P(N - A) = M - A
P = (M - A) / (N - A)
Substitute in Rinaldo's actual numbers and solve for P: M=$225,000, N=$700,000, and A=$175,000 ...
P = (225-175)/(700-175) = 50/525 = 0.0952 = 9.52%

That means he can spend 9.52% of the season in the NHL (17.71 days) and make the same as his minimum guaranteed salary.




To check our work, plug the numbers back in to the equation and solve for M:
700,000(0.0952) + 175,000(1-0.0952) = 66,666.67 + 158,333.33 = $225,000.


EDIT: gvitaly, different method, same result.
And they said you'd never use Algebra after high school
smiggy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy