|
View Poll Results: What do you think of the trade after a week of getting your head around it?
|
|
Love it, think Lucic is an upgrade
|
   
|
109 |
16.80% |
|
Like it, clears some cap space even if Lucic is no better
|
  
|
197 |
30.35% |
|
Indifferent, both teams getting a failed project
|
  
|
187 |
28.81% |
|
Dislike it, Neal needed another year to bounce back
|
  
|
107 |
16.49% |
|
Hate it, Neal will be better in Edmonton
|
  
|
49 |
7.55% |
07-19-2019, 03:38 PM
|
#602
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Not sure what you are seeing but the NMC was originally for the life of the contract on capfriendly
It turns from a full NMC to a modified NTC AND NMC in the last 2 years.
|
What would be the point of this? A NMC clearly supercedes a modified NTC, so why bother?
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:38 PM
|
#603
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum
Impossible.
|
Lol i went 6 months a couple years ago. Lost 40lbs and felt great. Went on a 30 day road trip and was back to being a goon again. 
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:38 PM
|
#604
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
I really thought Neal would bounce back a little, maybe 15 goals. Lucic just lands with a thud.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:39 PM
|
#605
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded
5.75 plus 10% retention on Neal
|
The retention is on Lucic.
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:39 PM
|
#606
|
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
So just to clarify - When Bob McKenzie made the one for one joke tweet, he didn't additionally say there is no pick on air or anything, that was just sureloss misinterpreting his tweet?
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:39 PM
|
#607
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
Lucic can't skate. No matter how bad Neal was, a battle-scarred 30+ winger with bad skating isn't the answer in today's NHL.
If you need me, I'll be crying in the corner.
|
Neal is also a 30+ winger with bad skating.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mikeecho For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:39 PM
|
#608
|
|
Norm!
|
If we can get Bennett and Lucic to do this to McDavid next year, then I'm ok with this deal
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:40 PM
|
#609
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
I really thought Neal would bounce back a little, maybe 15 goals. Lucic just lands with a thud.
|
Even the same crappy play with a return to normal shooting percentage would get him there.
He really must have been bad in the room
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#610
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
The retention is on Lucic.
|
Yes , 600k of Lucic 6.00 * 10% = 600k
5,75 Neal + 600k Lucic = 6.35
Where are you confused?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CanadaMatt For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#611
|
|
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
What would be the point of this? A NMC clearly supercedes a modified NTC, so why bother?
|
I think it’d be to cover getting sent to the minors or exposed in an expansion draft but the NMC likely has a provision that excludes trades and that’s why there’s a limited NTC was included.
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#612
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
The retention is on Lucic.
|
You are not getting it.. the Oilers will retain 600k on this 1-1 deal... which is effectively saying that to trade Lucic, the Oilers are picking up about $6.4 million dollars --> all they are getting is Neal back hence the connection that his salary can be viewed as higher than 5.75.
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#613
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary via Palm Desert
|
Lucic is very excited and eager about joining the Flames Kyper just said. He has a lot to prove and is looking forward to the Flames Kyper said as well. Not sure what the general feeling is but I'm excited for Lucic coming to Calgary, we NEED him to protect Johnny, Monahan etc
Was very disappointed with Neal last year
GO LOOCH
__________________
Marc Andre Fleury is the modern Patrick Roy
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#614
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
What would be the point of this? A NMC clearly supercedes a modified NTC, so why bother?
|
A full NTC means full trade protection, but can be assigned to the minors, and exposed in an expansion draft.
A full NMC means full trade protection, cannot be assigned to the minors, and not exposed in an expansion draft.
A modified NTC with a NMC means there is a list of teams that can be or not be traded to plus the ability to not be assigned to the minors and not exposed in an expansion draft.
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#615
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary Satellite Community
|
My biggest issue is the Flames should not be doing things the help the greasers out of a problem. Lucic is a boat anchor to that team and I want them to have to swim in it.
Throwing them a potential life preserver is not something a provincial rival should be doing at any point.
Last edited by greyshep; 07-19-2019 at 04:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to greyshep For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:41 PM
|
#616
|
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by swo2k1
Source?
Not that I don't believe you it's just that capfriendly seems to state otherwise.
|
Capfriendly shows NMC throughout with an additional modified NTC in the final two.
This would mean that essentially there is an addendum to the NMC, in that the player can be traded, but cannot be waived, placed in the minors, or unprotected in expansion.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:42 PM
|
#617
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I think we can all assume that Lucic will not have to be protected in the expansion draft.
We have to at this stage, or I'll need to get the gun.
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:42 PM
|
#618
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
The retention is on Lucic.
|
Lucic's retention + Neal's salary
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:42 PM
|
#619
|
|
First Line Centre
|
For those looking for some positives...
Lucic is younger
Lucic hits
The flames technically end up freeing up some salary
__________________
Go Flames Go
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2019, 03:42 PM
|
#620
|
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Ryan Rishaug
@TSNRyanRishaug
Can confirm Lucic has been traded to Flames. Done.
|
Done deal. Whatever it is.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.
|
|
Flames trade Neal for Lucic. Oilers retain 10% on Lucic (and maybe conditional pick)
